Loading…

Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?

Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411
Main Authors: Schuttler, Stephanie G, Sorensen, Amanda E, Jordan, Rebecca C, Cooper, Caren, Shwartz, Assaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3
container_end_page 411
container_issue 7
container_start_page 405
container_title Frontiers in ecology and the environment
container_volume 16
creator Schuttler, Stephanie G
Sorensen, Amanda E
Jordan, Rebecca C
Cooper, Caren
Shwartz, Assaf
description Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/fee.1826
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2164529972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44989585</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44989585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-AeEgBcvW5PNx268iJZWhYIgeg7b7KSm1OyabNX6600_9OYpE3hmhnkROqVkQAnJLy3AgJa53EM9KjjJFCNq_7fOlThERzHOk2S5YD30dBtcPXN-hrtXwL7qlgHwrGqvsKk8Nq5z3-BxNA68ARzgA0KEjYWvznnTucbjxqZfC2GDro_Rga0WEU52bx-9jEfPw_ts8nj3MLyZZIaVVGaG85pyKomAYlpzVdalmgpqa1YZbg0pCs6N4dLKWhkr03EWJFSM8WlqY5b10fl2bhua9yXETs-bZfBppc6p5CJXqsiTutgqE5oYA1jdBvdWhZWmRK8T0ykxvU4s0WxLP90CVv86PR6Ndv5s6-exa8Kf5-kWJUrBfgCVsXWh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164529972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><description>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fee.1826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Biodiversity ; Cognitive ability ; CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS ; Conservation ; Data collection ; Literature reviews ; Nature ; Urban areas ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44989585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44989585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Amanda E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-AeEgBcvW5PNx268iJZWhYIgeg7b7KSm1OyabNX6600_9OYpE3hmhnkROqVkQAnJLy3AgJa53EM9KjjJFCNq_7fOlThERzHOk2S5YD30dBtcPXN-hrtXwL7qlgHwrGqvsKk8Nq5z3-BxNA68ARzgA0KEjYWvznnTucbjxqZfC2GDro_Rga0WEU52bx-9jEfPw_ts8nj3MLyZZIaVVGaG85pyKomAYlpzVdalmgpqa1YZbg0pCs6N4dLKWhkr03EWJFSM8WlqY5b10fl2bhua9yXETs-bZfBppc6p5CJXqsiTutgqE5oYA1jdBvdWhZWmRK8T0ykxvU4s0WxLP90CVv86PR6Ndv5s6-exa8Kf5-kWJUrBfgCVsXWh</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creator><creator>Sorensen, Amanda E</creator><creator>Jordan, Rebecca C</creator><creator>Cooper, Caren</creator><creator>Shwartz, Assaf</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><author>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Amanda E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuttler, Stephanie G</au><au>Sorensen, Amanda E</au><au>Jordan, Rebecca C</au><au>Cooper, Caren</au><au>Shwartz, Assaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>405-411</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/fee.1826</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-9295
ispartof Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411
issn 1540-9295
1540-9309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2164529972
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects Attitudes
Biodiversity
Cognitive ability
CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS
Conservation
Data collection
Literature reviews
Nature
Urban areas
Wildlife conservation
title Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20the%20nature%20gap:%20can%20citizen%20science%20reverse%20the%20extinction%20of%20experience?&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Schuttler,%20Stephanie%20G&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=405-411&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fee.1826&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44989585%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164529972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44989585&rfr_iscdi=true