Loading…
Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?
Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3 |
container_end_page | 411 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Frontiers in ecology and the environment |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Schuttler, Stephanie G Sorensen, Amanda E Jordan, Rebecca C Cooper, Caren Shwartz, Assaf |
description | Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fee.1826 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2164529972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44989585</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44989585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-AeEgBcvW5PNx268iJZWhYIgeg7b7KSm1OyabNX6600_9OYpE3hmhnkROqVkQAnJLy3AgJa53EM9KjjJFCNq_7fOlThERzHOk2S5YD30dBtcPXN-hrtXwL7qlgHwrGqvsKk8Nq5z3-BxNA68ARzgA0KEjYWvznnTucbjxqZfC2GDro_Rga0WEU52bx-9jEfPw_ts8nj3MLyZZIaVVGaG85pyKomAYlpzVdalmgpqa1YZbg0pCs6N4dLKWhkr03EWJFSM8WlqY5b10fl2bhua9yXETs-bZfBppc6p5CJXqsiTutgqE5oYA1jdBvdWhZWmRK8T0ykxvU4s0WxLP90CVv86PR6Ndv5s6-exa8Kf5-kWJUrBfgCVsXWh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164529972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><description>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fee.1826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Biodiversity ; Cognitive ability ; CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS ; Conservation ; Data collection ; Literature reviews ; Nature ; Urban areas ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44989585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44989585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Amanda E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-AeEgBcvW5PNx268iJZWhYIgeg7b7KSm1OyabNX6600_9OYpE3hmhnkROqVkQAnJLy3AgJa53EM9KjjJFCNq_7fOlThERzHOk2S5YD30dBtcPXN-hrtXwL7qlgHwrGqvsKk8Nq5z3-BxNA68ARzgA0KEjYWvznnTucbjxqZfC2GDro_Rga0WEU52bx-9jEfPw_ts8nj3MLyZZIaVVGaG85pyKomAYlpzVdalmgpqa1YZbg0pCs6N4dLKWhkr03EWJFSM8WlqY5b10fl2bhua9yXETs-bZfBppc6p5CJXqsiTutgqE5oYA1jdBvdWhZWmRK8T0ykxvU4s0WxLP90CVv86PR6Ndv5s6-exa8Kf5-kWJUrBfgCVsXWh</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creator><creator>Sorensen, Amanda E</creator><creator>Jordan, Rebecca C</creator><creator>Cooper, Caren</creator><creator>Shwartz, Assaf</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</title><author>Schuttler, Stephanie G ; Sorensen, Amanda E ; Jordan, Rebecca C ; Cooper, Caren ; Shwartz, Assaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuttler, Stephanie G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Amanda E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Caren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shwartz, Assaf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuttler, Stephanie G</au><au>Sorensen, Amanda E</au><au>Jordan, Rebecca C</au><au>Cooper, Caren</au><au>Shwartz, Assaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience?</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>405-411</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Opportunities for people to interact with nature have declined over the past century, as many now live in urban areas and spend much of their time indoors. Conservation attitudes and behaviors largely depend on experiences with nature, and this "extinction of experience" (EOE) is a threat to biodiversity conservation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science, an increasingly popular way to integrate public outreach with data collection, can potentially mitigate EOE. Our review of the literature on volunteers' motivations and/or outcomes indicates that nature-based citizen science (NBCS) fosters cognitive and emotional aspects of experiences in nature. Although these experiences can change participants' behaviors and attitudes toward the natural world, this field remains largely unstudied. As such, even though NBCS can complement efforts to increase opportunities for people to interact with nature, further research on the mechanisms that drive this relationship is needed to strengthen our understanding of various outcomes of citizen science.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/fee.1826</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-9295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2018-09, Vol.16 (7), p.405-411 |
issn | 1540-9295 1540-9309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2164529972 |
source | Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】 |
subjects | Attitudes Biodiversity Cognitive ability CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS Conservation Data collection Literature reviews Nature Urban areas Wildlife conservation |
title | Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20the%20nature%20gap:%20can%20citizen%20science%20reverse%20the%20extinction%20of%20experience?&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Schuttler,%20Stephanie%20G&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=405-411&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fee.1826&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44989585%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-c44d141605e7bd498d89b51fd3ac4fc07744cc46f6d9cf6100fe6ea334b1413f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164529972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44989585&rfr_iscdi=true |