Loading…
The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis
Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioscience 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3 |
container_end_page | 367 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 360 |
container_title | Bioscience |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J SUCKLING, KIERAN F RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J |
description | Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216478457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A131974542</galeid><jstor_id>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:teotes]2.0.co;2</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A131974542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlktFq2zAUhs3YYFm3dzDbzXrhVLIky-6u0sxLC2FhJLsqRSjykafgWKklj_XtJ-MyGgijbOhC6PCdD-noj6ILjKY4o_gCIZQlhGX5xxQhdo4Yu0UkQ5ebcrUp13fpFE3nq0_pi2iCWcoSklL6Mpr86XodvXFuF46YkmISXW9-QFxqDcqbn9CCc7HVsR-KbSXbGjqo4vUBlAEXz5S_jGfxt1623ng5dMSzVjYPzri30SstGwfvHvez6PuXcjO_Tparxc18tky2Oc99kqm8gkJLnHKdcSAISDhRTqtMUagkkltEChZelAGvVMFSzTjmLNfACOSanEXvR--hs_c9OC92tu_CJZxIw3x4ThkP0IcRqmUDwrTa-k6qvXFKzDDBBaeMpoFKTlB1mEInG9uCNqF8xE9P8GFVsDfqZMP5UUNgPPzyteydEzfrr89nrxbPZvPF8m-PfGSVbRqoQYS_ma-O-cXIq84614EWh87sZfcgMBJDAMUQJTFESQwBFCGAYgigGAMoUoFEUA6mq9Fk-8NJSXIkuX0iuXsi-TxKds7b7j_uUo6arbHho_7Z8xuzGQYu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216478457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creator><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><description>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: American Institute of Biological Sciences</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Case Studies ; Conservation (Concept) ; DEPARTMENTS ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Endangered Species Act ; Environmental policy ; Extinct species ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Logistic regression ; Population biology ; Population Trends ; Regression (Statistics) ; Scientific Research ; Suckling ; Threatened species ; Weighted Scores ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367</ispartof><rights>American Institute of Biological Sciences</rights><rights>2005 American Institute of Biological Sciences 2005</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Biological Sciences Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216478457/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216478457?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><title>Bioscience</title><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><description>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Conservation (Concept)</subject><subject>DEPARTMENTS</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Endangered Species Act</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population Trends</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><subject>Suckling</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Weighted Scores</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqlktFq2zAUhs3YYFm3dzDbzXrhVLIky-6u0sxLC2FhJLsqRSjykafgWKklj_XtJ-MyGgijbOhC6PCdD-noj6ILjKY4o_gCIZQlhGX5xxQhdo4Yu0UkQ5ebcrUp13fpFE3nq0_pi2iCWcoSklL6Mpr86XodvXFuF46YkmISXW9-QFxqDcqbn9CCc7HVsR-KbSXbGjqo4vUBlAEXz5S_jGfxt1623ng5dMSzVjYPzri30SstGwfvHvez6PuXcjO_Tparxc18tky2Oc99kqm8gkJLnHKdcSAISDhRTqtMUagkkltEChZelAGvVMFSzTjmLNfACOSanEXvR--hs_c9OC92tu_CJZxIw3x4ThkP0IcRqmUDwrTa-k6qvXFKzDDBBaeMpoFKTlB1mEInG9uCNqF8xE9P8GFVsDfqZMP5UUNgPPzyteydEzfrr89nrxbPZvPF8m-PfGSVbRqoQYS_ma-O-cXIq84614EWh87sZfcgMBJDAMUQJTFESQwBFCGAYgigGAMoUoFEUA6mq9Fk-8NJSXIkuX0iuXsi-TxKds7b7j_uUo6arbHho_7Z8xuzGQYu</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creator><creator>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creator><creator>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creator><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><author>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Conservation (Concept)</topic><topic>DEPARTMENTS</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Endangered Species Act</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population Trends</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><topic>Suckling</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Weighted Scores</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</au><au>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</au><au>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>360-367</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>American Institute of Biological Sciences</pub><doi>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3568 |
ispartof | Bioscience, 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367 |
issn | 0006-3568 1525-3244 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216478457 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Education Collection |
subjects | Animal populations Animals Biodiversity Case Studies Conservation (Concept) DEPARTMENTS Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Endangered Species Act Environmental policy Extinct species Habitat conservation Habitats Logistic regression Population biology Population Trends Regression (Statistics) Scientific Research Suckling Threatened species Weighted Scores Wildlife conservation Wildlife habitats |
title | The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effectiveness%20of%20the%20Endangered%20Species%20Act:%20A%20Quantitative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=TAYLOR,%20MARTIN%20F.%20J&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=360-367&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:TEOTES%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA131974542%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216478457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A131974542&rft_jstor_id=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:teotes%5D2.0.co;2&rft_oup_id=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:TEOTES%5D2.0.CO;2&rfr_iscdi=true |