Loading…

The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis

Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioscience 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367
Main Authors: TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J, SUCKLING, KIERAN F, RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 360
container_title Bioscience
container_volume 55
creator TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J
SUCKLING, KIERAN F
RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J
description Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.
doi_str_mv 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216478457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A131974542</galeid><jstor_id>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:teotes]2.0.co;2</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A131974542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlktFq2zAUhs3YYFm3dzDbzXrhVLIky-6u0sxLC2FhJLsqRSjykafgWKklj_XtJ-MyGgijbOhC6PCdD-noj6ILjKY4o_gCIZQlhGX5xxQhdo4Yu0UkQ5ebcrUp13fpFE3nq0_pi2iCWcoSklL6Mpr86XodvXFuF46YkmISXW9-QFxqDcqbn9CCc7HVsR-KbSXbGjqo4vUBlAEXz5S_jGfxt1623ng5dMSzVjYPzri30SstGwfvHvez6PuXcjO_Tparxc18tky2Oc99kqm8gkJLnHKdcSAISDhRTqtMUagkkltEChZelAGvVMFSzTjmLNfACOSanEXvR--hs_c9OC92tu_CJZxIw3x4ThkP0IcRqmUDwrTa-k6qvXFKzDDBBaeMpoFKTlB1mEInG9uCNqF8xE9P8GFVsDfqZMP5UUNgPPzyteydEzfrr89nrxbPZvPF8m-PfGSVbRqoQYS_ma-O-cXIq84614EWh87sZfcgMBJDAMUQJTFESQwBFCGAYgigGAMoUoFEUA6mq9Fk-8NJSXIkuX0iuXsi-TxKds7b7j_uUo6arbHho_7Z8xuzGQYu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216478457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creator><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><description>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: American Institute of Biological Sciences</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Case Studies ; Conservation (Concept) ; DEPARTMENTS ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Endangered Species Act ; Environmental policy ; Extinct species ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Logistic regression ; Population biology ; Population Trends ; Regression (Statistics) ; Scientific Research ; Suckling ; Threatened species ; Weighted Scores ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367</ispartof><rights>American Institute of Biological Sciences</rights><rights>2005 American Institute of Biological Sciences 2005</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Biological Sciences Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216478457/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216478457?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><title>Bioscience</title><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><description>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Conservation (Concept)</subject><subject>DEPARTMENTS</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Endangered Species Act</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population Trends</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><subject>Suckling</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Weighted Scores</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqlktFq2zAUhs3YYFm3dzDbzXrhVLIky-6u0sxLC2FhJLsqRSjykafgWKklj_XtJ-MyGgijbOhC6PCdD-noj6ILjKY4o_gCIZQlhGX5xxQhdo4Yu0UkQ5ebcrUp13fpFE3nq0_pi2iCWcoSklL6Mpr86XodvXFuF46YkmISXW9-QFxqDcqbn9CCc7HVsR-KbSXbGjqo4vUBlAEXz5S_jGfxt1623ng5dMSzVjYPzri30SstGwfvHvez6PuXcjO_Tparxc18tky2Oc99kqm8gkJLnHKdcSAISDhRTqtMUagkkltEChZelAGvVMFSzTjmLNfACOSanEXvR--hs_c9OC92tu_CJZxIw3x4ThkP0IcRqmUDwrTa-k6qvXFKzDDBBaeMpoFKTlB1mEInG9uCNqF8xE9P8GFVsDfqZMP5UUNgPPzyteydEzfrr89nrxbPZvPF8m-PfGSVbRqoQYS_ma-O-cXIq84614EWh87sZfcgMBJDAMUQJTFESQwBFCGAYgigGAMoUoFEUA6mq9Fk-8NJSXIkuX0iuXsi-TxKds7b7j_uUo6arbHho_7Z8xuzGQYu</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creator><creator>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creator><creator>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creator><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</title><author>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J ; SUCKLING, KIERAN F ; RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Conservation (Concept)</topic><topic>DEPARTMENTS</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Endangered Species Act</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population Trends</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><topic>Suckling</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Weighted Scores</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TAYLOR, MARTIN F. J</au><au>SUCKLING, KIERAN F</au><au>RACHLINSKI, JEFFREY J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>360-367</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>Population trends for 1095 species listed as threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act were correlated with the length of time the species were listed and the presence or absence of critical habitat and recovery plans. Species with critical habitat for two or more years were more than twice as likely to have an improving population trend in the late 1990s, and less than half as likely to be declining in the early 1990s, as species without. Species with dedicated recovery plans for two or more years were significantly more likely to be improving and less likely to be declining than species without. The proportion of species improving increased, and the proportion declining decreased, with increasing time listed throughout the 1990s, irrespective of critical habitat and recovery plans. On the basis of these results, we recommend increased funding for earlier listing of imperiled species and prompt provision of critical habitat and recovery plans.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>American Institute of Biological Sciences</pub><doi>10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0360:TEOTES]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3568
ispartof Bioscience, 2005-04, Vol.55 (4), p.360-367
issn 0006-3568
1525-3244
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_216478457
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Education Collection
subjects Animal populations
Animals
Biodiversity
Case Studies
Conservation (Concept)
DEPARTMENTS
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Endangered Species Act
Environmental policy
Extinct species
Habitat conservation
Habitats
Logistic regression
Population biology
Population Trends
Regression (Statistics)
Scientific Research
Suckling
Threatened species
Weighted Scores
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife habitats
title The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effectiveness%20of%20the%20Endangered%20Species%20Act:%20A%20Quantitative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=TAYLOR,%20MARTIN%20F.%20J&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=360-367&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:TEOTES%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA131974542%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b878t-6c8de9fa127f67e30e39fa474d6c4eda0ab03950366e7dc952f571758fe53e8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216478457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A131974542&rft_jstor_id=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:teotes%5D2.0.co;2&rft_oup_id=10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055%5B0360:TEOTES%5D2.0.CO;2&rfr_iscdi=true