The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints

The effect of adherent thickness on the fatigue performance, fatigue limit, and failure mode of adhesively bonded thin aluminum single lap joint (SLJ) was experimentally and numerically investigated. High‐cycle fatigue tests were performed, and fatigue life was estimated using various fatigue criter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures 2019-02, Vol.42 (2), p.561-571
Main Authors: Shahani, Amir Reza, Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
adherent thickness
Adhesive bonding
Adhesive joints
Aluminum
Bonded joints
Case studies
Crack propagation
Criteria
Empirical analysis
Failure modes
Fatigue failure
Fatigue life
Fatigue limit
Fatigue strength
Fatigue tests
Finite element method
Lap joints
Mathematical models
Plastic deformation
Thickness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323
container_end_page 571
container_issue 2
container_start_page 561
container_title Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures
container_volume 42
creator Shahani, Amir Reza
Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid
description The effect of adherent thickness on the fatigue performance, fatigue limit, and failure mode of adhesively bonded thin aluminum single lap joint (SLJ) was experimentally and numerically investigated. High‐cycle fatigue tests were performed, and fatigue life was estimated using various fatigue criteria and finite element modeling. Based on the experimental results, increase in adherent thickness leads to increase in fatigue limit. In addition, failure location changes from adhesive to adherent by increasing the adherent thickness. It seems that in adherent failure, selecting a sheet with higher fatigue strength is required to achieve higher fatigue life. Also, based on the analysis of different fatigue criteria, Smith‐Watson‐Topper criterion could predict the joint fatigue life more accurately by considering the mean stress effect and the plastic strain. Finally, as an important result, an unsymmetrical SLJ specimen was evaluated as an industrial case study, and the empirical estimated life was consistent with the experimental results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ffe.12931
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2164933212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2164933212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGk9d8kHlHVAlIkliKxWU58pi4hLnEK6rfHJTByyy2_9-7eQ-iakhlNM3cOZpQpTk_QhIqcZCxX8hRNykLmWSHLl3N0EeOWEJoLzieoWm8AQ1I1Aw4OG7uBHroBDxvfvHUQIw4ddmbwr3vArXfwR0X_Ce0B16GzYPE2-G6Il-jMmTbC1e-eoufVcr14yKqn-8fFXZU1TBU0U8qUxFngNTWitiY9Q0sFhawbYqgECqKRxBqeS-E4aSSXpKx5LnIrFOOMT9HN6Lvrw8ce4qC3Yd936aRmKZfinNEjdTtSTR9i7MHpXe_fTX_QlOhjWTrF1j9lJXY-sl--hcP_oF6tlqPiG9w3agE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164933212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Shahani, Amir Reza ; Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahani, Amir Reza ; Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of adherent thickness on the fatigue performance, fatigue limit, and failure mode of adhesively bonded thin aluminum single lap joint (SLJ) was experimentally and numerically investigated. High‐cycle fatigue tests were performed, and fatigue life was estimated using various fatigue criteria and finite element modeling. Based on the experimental results, increase in adherent thickness leads to increase in fatigue limit. In addition, failure location changes from adhesive to adherent by increasing the adherent thickness. It seems that in adherent failure, selecting a sheet with higher fatigue strength is required to achieve higher fatigue life. Also, based on the analysis of different fatigue criteria, Smith‐Watson‐Topper criterion could predict the joint fatigue life more accurately by considering the mean stress effect and the plastic strain. Finally, as an important result, an unsymmetrical SLJ specimen was evaluated as an industrial case study, and the empirical estimated life was consistent with the experimental results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-758X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adherent thickness ; Adhesive bonding ; Adhesive joints ; Aluminum ; Bonded joints ; Case studies ; Crack propagation ; Criteria ; Empirical analysis ; Failure modes ; Fatigue failure ; Fatigue life ; Fatigue limit ; Fatigue strength ; Fatigue tests ; Finite element method ; Lap joints ; Mathematical models ; Plastic deformation ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures, 2019-02, Vol.42 (2), p.561-571</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0070-6260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahani, Amir Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints</title><title>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</title><description>The effect of adherent thickness on the fatigue performance, fatigue limit, and failure mode of adhesively bonded thin aluminum single lap joint (SLJ) was experimentally and numerically investigated. High‐cycle fatigue tests were performed, and fatigue life was estimated using various fatigue criteria and finite element modeling. Based on the experimental results, increase in adherent thickness leads to increase in fatigue limit. In addition, failure location changes from adhesive to adherent by increasing the adherent thickness. It seems that in adherent failure, selecting a sheet with higher fatigue strength is required to achieve higher fatigue life. Also, based on the analysis of different fatigue criteria, Smith‐Watson‐Topper criterion could predict the joint fatigue life more accurately by considering the mean stress effect and the plastic strain. Finally, as an important result, an unsymmetrical SLJ specimen was evaluated as an industrial case study, and the empirical estimated life was consistent with the experimental results.</description><subject>adherent thickness</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesive joints</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Bonded joints</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Fatigue life</subject><subject>Fatigue limit</subject><subject>Fatigue strength</subject><subject>Fatigue tests</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Lap joints</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>8756-758X</issn><issn>1460-2695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0sMTGk9d8kHlHVAlIkliKxWU58pi4hLnEK6rfHJTByyy2_9-7eQ-iakhlNM3cOZpQpTk_QhIqcZCxX8hRNykLmWSHLl3N0EeOWEJoLzieoWm8AQ1I1Aw4OG7uBHroBDxvfvHUQIw4ddmbwr3vArXfwR0X_Ce0B16GzYPE2-G6Il-jMmTbC1e-eoufVcr14yKqn-8fFXZU1TBU0U8qUxFngNTWitiY9Q0sFhawbYqgECqKRxBqeS-E4aSSXpKx5LnIrFOOMT9HN6Lvrw8ce4qC3Yd936aRmKZfinNEjdTtSTR9i7MHpXe_fTX_QlOhjWTrF1j9lJXY-sl--hcP_oF6tlqPiG9w3agE</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Shahani, Amir Reza</creator><creator>Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-6260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints</title><author>Shahani, Amir Reza ; Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adherent thickness</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesive joints</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Bonded joints</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Fatigue life</topic><topic>Fatigue limit</topic><topic>Fatigue strength</topic><topic>Fatigue tests</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Lap joints</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahani, Amir Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahani, Amir Reza</au><au>Pourhosseini, Seyed Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints</atitle><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>561-571</pages><issn>8756-758X</issn><eissn>1460-2695</eissn><abstract>The effect of adherent thickness on the fatigue performance, fatigue limit, and failure mode of adhesively bonded thin aluminum single lap joint (SLJ) was experimentally and numerically investigated. High‐cycle fatigue tests were performed, and fatigue life was estimated using various fatigue criteria and finite element modeling. Based on the experimental results, increase in adherent thickness leads to increase in fatigue limit. In addition, failure location changes from adhesive to adherent by increasing the adherent thickness. It seems that in adherent failure, selecting a sheet with higher fatigue strength is required to achieve higher fatigue life. Also, based on the analysis of different fatigue criteria, Smith‐Watson‐Topper criterion could predict the joint fatigue life more accurately by considering the mean stress effect and the plastic strain. Finally, as an important result, an unsymmetrical SLJ specimen was evaluated as an industrial case study, and the empirical estimated life was consistent with the experimental results.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ffe.12931</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-6260</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-758X
ispartof Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures, 2019-02, Vol.42 (2), p.561-571
issn 8756-758X
1460-2695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2164933212
source Wiley
subjects adherent thickness
Adhesive bonding
Adhesive joints
Aluminum
Bonded joints
Case studies
Crack propagation
Criteria
Empirical analysis
Failure modes
Fatigue failure
Fatigue life
Fatigue limit
Fatigue strength
Fatigue tests
Finite element method
Lap joints
Mathematical models
Plastic deformation
Thickness
title The effect of adherent thickness on fatigue life of adhesively bonded joints
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20adherent%20thickness%20on%20fatigue%20life%20of%20adhesively%20bonded%20joints&rft.jtitle=Fatigue%20&%20fracture%20of%20engineering%20materials%20&%20structures&rft.au=Shahani,%20Amir%20Reza&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=561-571&rft.issn=8756-758X&rft.eissn=1460-2695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ffe.12931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2164933212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2971-99a80fde3b1a4bda001189e75bc0a15e1e4c50da3654f30c53508b3646d492323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164933212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true