Loading…
Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics
Since the euro crisis, protest movements present the European Union as a neoliberal hegemony that undermines democracy and prevents progressive reforms. They call for acts of resistance and partial disintegration to force a renegotiation of the treaties. In this article, I ask whether these ‘disrupt...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of international political theory 2019-02, Vol.15 (1), p.82-99 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73 |
container_end_page | 99 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Journal of international political theory |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Patberg, Markus |
description | Since the euro crisis, protest movements present the European Union as a neoliberal hegemony that undermines democracy and prevents progressive reforms. They call for acts of resistance and partial disintegration to force a renegotiation of the treaties. In this article, I ask whether these ‘disruptive’ political strategies can be defended as a democratic practice of constitutional politics. To that end, I turn to the notion of destituent power, according to which opposition to or withdrawal from public authority can function as a legitimate trigger for constitutional change. I systematise the emerging debate on destituent power and discuss the plausibility of competing approaches. I argue that destituent power is best understood as grounded in popular sovereignty. It denotes the right to dismantle constitutional orders without the intention to construct new ones. While this idea supports some of the acts of contestation proposed by European protest movements, it faces a lure towards the jurisgenerative dimension of constituent power. Ultimately, the potential of a purely negativistic logic of constitutional politics is limited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1755088218806916 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2166296030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1755088218806916</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2166296030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPqzPZbDbrTWr9gEIv9rzEbbZN2SZrklX8701dQRC8TIY37_2YDCGXCNeIZXmDZVGAlAylBFGhOCKTg5RhydjxT3-Yn5KzEHYAgstCTsj2Xodo4qBtpL370J4aS-NW0_ngXa-VpStrnL2ly1HuzN7EQF1LFbV6o6J5NwnQ0M5tUk164-w3MaaY6hK0M2kezslJq7qgL37eKVk9zF9mT9li-fg8u1tkTV5gzDQ2Ra54W6m15IAMGQDnyColEPSraHibt5ILQJBViazgUPEcedGscyZVmU_J1cjtvXsb0ufqnRt82iTUDIVglYAckgtGV-NdCF63de_NXvnPGqE-3LP-e88UycZIUBv9C_3X_wVQEHPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166296030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patberg, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Patberg, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Since the euro crisis, protest movements present the European Union as a neoliberal hegemony that undermines democracy and prevents progressive reforms. They call for acts of resistance and partial disintegration to force a renegotiation of the treaties. In this article, I ask whether these ‘disruptive’ political strategies can be defended as a democratic practice of constitutional politics. To that end, I turn to the notion of destituent power, according to which opposition to or withdrawal from public authority can function as a legitimate trigger for constitutional change. I systematise the emerging debate on destituent power and discuss the plausibility of competing approaches. I argue that destituent power is best understood as grounded in popular sovereignty. It denotes the right to dismantle constitutional orders without the intention to construct new ones. While this idea supports some of the acts of contestation proposed by European protest movements, it faces a lure towards the jurisgenerative dimension of constituent power. Ultimately, the potential of a purely negativistic logic of constitutional politics is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-0882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1755088218806916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Democratization ; Hegemony ; Neoliberalism ; Power ; Protest movements ; Resistance ; Sovereignty ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Journal of international political theory, 2019-02, Vol.15 (1), p.82-99</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patberg, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics</title><title>Journal of international political theory</title><description>Since the euro crisis, protest movements present the European Union as a neoliberal hegemony that undermines democracy and prevents progressive reforms. They call for acts of resistance and partial disintegration to force a renegotiation of the treaties. In this article, I ask whether these ‘disruptive’ political strategies can be defended as a democratic practice of constitutional politics. To that end, I turn to the notion of destituent power, according to which opposition to or withdrawal from public authority can function as a legitimate trigger for constitutional change. I systematise the emerging debate on destituent power and discuss the plausibility of competing approaches. I argue that destituent power is best understood as grounded in popular sovereignty. It denotes the right to dismantle constitutional orders without the intention to construct new ones. While this idea supports some of the acts of contestation proposed by European protest movements, it faces a lure towards the jurisgenerative dimension of constituent power. Ultimately, the potential of a purely negativistic logic of constitutional politics is limited.</description><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Protest movements</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>1755-0882</issn><issn>1755-1722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPqzPZbDbrTWr9gEIv9rzEbbZN2SZrklX8701dQRC8TIY37_2YDCGXCNeIZXmDZVGAlAylBFGhOCKTg5RhydjxT3-Yn5KzEHYAgstCTsj2Xodo4qBtpL370J4aS-NW0_ngXa-VpStrnL2ly1HuzN7EQF1LFbV6o6J5NwnQ0M5tUk164-w3MaaY6hK0M2kezslJq7qgL37eKVk9zF9mT9li-fg8u1tkTV5gzDQ2Ra54W6m15IAMGQDnyColEPSraHibt5ILQJBViazgUPEcedGscyZVmU_J1cjtvXsb0ufqnRt82iTUDIVglYAckgtGV-NdCF63de_NXvnPGqE-3LP-e88UycZIUBv9C_3X_wVQEHPM</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Patberg, Markus</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics</title><author>Patberg, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Protest movements</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patberg, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of international political theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patberg, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international political theory</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>82-99</pages><issn>1755-0882</issn><eissn>1755-1722</eissn><abstract>Since the euro crisis, protest movements present the European Union as a neoliberal hegemony that undermines democracy and prevents progressive reforms. They call for acts of resistance and partial disintegration to force a renegotiation of the treaties. In this article, I ask whether these ‘disruptive’ political strategies can be defended as a democratic practice of constitutional politics. To that end, I turn to the notion of destituent power, according to which opposition to or withdrawal from public authority can function as a legitimate trigger for constitutional change. I systematise the emerging debate on destituent power and discuss the plausibility of competing approaches. I argue that destituent power is best understood as grounded in popular sovereignty. It denotes the right to dismantle constitutional orders without the intention to construct new ones. While this idea supports some of the acts of contestation proposed by European protest movements, it faces a lure towards the jurisgenerative dimension of constituent power. Ultimately, the potential of a purely negativistic logic of constitutional politics is limited.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1755088218806916</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-0882 |
ispartof | Journal of international political theory, 2019-02, Vol.15 (1), p.82-99 |
issn | 1755-0882 1755-1722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2166296030 |
source | SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Democratization Hegemony Neoliberalism Power Protest movements Resistance Sovereignty Treaties |
title | Destituent power in the European Union: On the limits of a negativistic logic of constitutional politics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Destituent%20power%20in%20the%20European%20Union:%20On%20the%20limits%20of%20a%20negativistic%20logic%20of%20constitutional%20politics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20political%20theory&rft.au=Patberg,%20Markus&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=82-99&rft.issn=1755-0882&rft.eissn=1755-1722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1755088218806916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2166296030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e1c53a4f9ad84012120044129a610eb6c4f3f84601089712540943145cd328a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166296030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1755088218806916&rfr_iscdi=true |