Monitoring Moral Virtue: When the Moral Transgressions of In-Group Members Are Judged More Severely

Literature indicates that people tend to judge the moral transgressions committed by out-group members more severely than those of in-group members. However, these transgressions often conflate a moral transgression with some form of intergroup harm. There is little research examining in-group versu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cross-cultural psychology 2019-02, Vol.50 (2), p.268-284
Main Authors: Bettache, Karim, Hamamura, Takeshi, Amrani Idrissi, Joubyr, Amenyogbo, Ruben George Jonathan, Chiu, Chi-yue
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Christians
Commitment
Fictitious
Group Unity
Hindus
Morality
Muslims
Offenses
Religious communities
Social cohesion
Transgression
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Literature indicates that people tend to judge the moral transgressions committed by out-group members more severely than those of in-group members. However, these transgressions often conflate a moral transgression with some form of intergroup harm. There is little research examining in-group versus out-group transgressions of harmless offenses, which violate moral standards that bind people together (binding foundations). As these moral standards center around group cohesiveness, a transgression committed by an in-group member may be judged more severely. The current research presented Dutch Muslims (Study 1), American Christians (Study 2), and Indian Hindus (Study 3) with a set of fictitious stories depicting harmless and harmful moral transgressions. Consistent with our expectations, participants who strongly identified with their religious community judged harmless moral offenses committed by in-group members, relative to out-group members, more severely. In contrast, this effect was absent when participants judged harmful moral transgressions. We discuss the implications of these results.
ISSN:0022-0221
1552-5422
DOI:10.1177/0022022118814687