Political Esperanto: Rhetorical Resources and Limitations of The Christian Right in the United States

This study analyzes a paradox in the rhetorical strategies of the Christian Right in the United States: How can doctrinally conservative political activists justify “legislating morality” in a culture in which individual autonomy is a central value? This essay is based on the assumption that, althou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociology of religion 2005-09, Vol.66 (3), p.303-321
Main Author: Jelen, Ted G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Children
Christian morality
Christianity
Christians
Conservatism
Culture
Discourse
Evaluation
General studies. Ideologies
Homosexuality
Judeo Christian tradition
Morality
Political activism
Political aspects
Political discourse
Political sociology
Religion & politics
Religion and politics
Religious aspects
Sociology
Sociology of religion
Synthetic languages
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study analyzes a paradox in the rhetorical strategies of the Christian Right in the United States: How can doctrinally conservative political activists justify “legislating morality” in a culture in which individual autonomy is a central value? This essay is based on the assumption that, although there exist competing values and religious frameworks in the United States, the language of liberal individualism is the lingua franca for distinctively public discourse. Such activists attempt to advance a socially conservative agenda in an individualist culture by emphasizing the existence of competing rights, invoking the special status of children, utilizing the language of the natural sciences, and identifying powerful alien forces.
ISSN:1069-4404
1759-8818
DOI:10.2307/4153101