Loading…
Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula
Background: QT interval prolongation is a marker of abnormal repolarization. In patients with major ventricular conduction defects (VCD), the assessment of ventricular repolarization remains controversial. Use of special indexes, or 2-parameters formulas for QTc and JTc has been proposed. However, t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of electrocardiology 2018-11, Vol.51 (6), p.1184-1184 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1184 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1184 |
container_title | Journal of electrocardiology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos |
description | Background: QT interval prolongation is a marker of abnormal repolarization. In patients with major ventricular conduction defects (VCD), the assessment of ventricular repolarization remains controversial. Use of special indexes, or 2-parameters formulas for QTc and JTc has been proposed. However, the complexity of these methods precludes its wide clinical application. We have proposed (AHA 2012) a very simple formula for QT correction: QTc=2QT/((l +RR)). We propose that this expression can be used for the evaluation of repolarization across all the spectrum of QRS duration (QRSD), including patients with ventricular conduction defects. Methods: We have analyzed the data from a random subset (19023 subjects, including 434 VCD cases) of the ECC-ViEW II, a Korean electrocardiogram database. We calculated the QTc interval using 4 correction formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Framinham, and our new formula). We correlated the QTc values of each method with the RR interval and QRS duration (QRSD), performing a multiple regression analysis . An ideal correction formula should minimize the coefficient of determination (R2). Results: We found that our formula provides the best correction. (R2 for the new formula 0, 07, Bazett 0,16, Fridericia 0,22, Framinham 0,12). Using the new formula in the subjects with normal ventricular conduction, the mean QTc is 0,416 +- 0,023 with an upper 5% normal limit of 0,459. In the VCD cases these values are 30 ms higher (mean 0,446 +- 0,028, upper 5% normal limit 0,489) Conclusion: We propose a very simple, universal formula for the evaluation of QT interval in patients with normal conduction and in patients with major ventricular conduction defects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.081 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2167806939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022073618307210</els_id><sourcerecordid>2167806939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1409-3a243675e975059ff8617be584decdfa6def540bcd0048b8e287b91fc6020f1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-h6DnrZPsV9ZbqVYLRRGqeAvZZAJZthtNtor_van14NHTwLz3m8c8Qi4YTBmw6qqbdtijHoPXKpgpByaSMAXBDsiElTnPRJHDIZkAcJ5BnVfH5CTGDgAaXvMJeZ3FiDFucBipt_RpTZfDiOFD9dQN9CWtg9PbXgU694PZ6tH5gd6gTZnxmr6o3hn1s0uwog_4SRc-bBJwRo6s6iOe_85T8ry4Xc_vs9Xj3XI-W2WaFdBkueJFXtUlNnUJZWOtqFjdYikKg9pYVRm0ZQGtNgCFaAVyUbcNs7oCDpa1-Sm53N99C_59i3GUnd-GIUVKzqpaQNXkTXJd7106-BgDWvkW3EaFL8lA7pqUnfzbpNw1udNSkwm-2cOY_vhwGGTUDgeNxoVESOPdf858A8Y0gy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167806939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</creatorcontrib><description>Background: QT interval prolongation is a marker of abnormal repolarization. In patients with major ventricular conduction defects (VCD), the assessment of ventricular repolarization remains controversial. Use of special indexes, or 2-parameters formulas for QTc and JTc has been proposed. However, the complexity of these methods precludes its wide clinical application. We have proposed (AHA 2012) a very simple formula for QT correction: QTc=2QT/((l +RR)). We propose that this expression can be used for the evaluation of repolarization across all the spectrum of QRS duration (QRSD), including patients with ventricular conduction defects. Methods: We have analyzed the data from a random subset (19023 subjects, including 434 VCD cases) of the ECC-ViEW II, a Korean electrocardiogram database. We calculated the QTc interval using 4 correction formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Framinham, and our new formula). We correlated the QTc values of each method with the RR interval and QRS duration (QRSD), performing a multiple regression analysis . An ideal correction formula should minimize the coefficient of determination (R2). Results: We found that our formula provides the best correction. (R2 for the new formula 0, 07, Bazett 0,16, Fridericia 0,22, Framinham 0,12). Using the new formula in the subjects with normal ventricular conduction, the mean QTc is 0,416 +- 0,023 with an upper 5% normal limit of 0,459. In the VCD cases these values are 30 ms higher (mean 0,446 +- 0,028, upper 5% normal limit 0,489) Conclusion: We propose a very simple, universal formula for the evaluation of QT interval in patients with normal conduction and in patients with major ventricular conduction defects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia ; Data analysis ; Electrocardiography ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Journal of electrocardiology, 2018-11, Vol.51 (6), p.1184-1184</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov/Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula</title><title>Journal of electrocardiology</title><description>Background: QT interval prolongation is a marker of abnormal repolarization. In patients with major ventricular conduction defects (VCD), the assessment of ventricular repolarization remains controversial. Use of special indexes, or 2-parameters formulas for QTc and JTc has been proposed. However, the complexity of these methods precludes its wide clinical application. We have proposed (AHA 2012) a very simple formula for QT correction: QTc=2QT/((l +RR)). We propose that this expression can be used for the evaluation of repolarization across all the spectrum of QRS duration (QRSD), including patients with ventricular conduction defects. Methods: We have analyzed the data from a random subset (19023 subjects, including 434 VCD cases) of the ECC-ViEW II, a Korean electrocardiogram database. We calculated the QTc interval using 4 correction formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Framinham, and our new formula). We correlated the QTc values of each method with the RR interval and QRS duration (QRSD), performing a multiple regression analysis . An ideal correction formula should minimize the coefficient of determination (R2). Results: We found that our formula provides the best correction. (R2 for the new formula 0, 07, Bazett 0,16, Fridericia 0,22, Framinham 0,12). Using the new formula in the subjects with normal ventricular conduction, the mean QTc is 0,416 +- 0,023 with an upper 5% normal limit of 0,459. In the VCD cases these values are 30 ms higher (mean 0,446 +- 0,028, upper 5% normal limit 0,489) Conclusion: We propose a very simple, universal formula for the evaluation of QT interval in patients with normal conduction and in patients with major ventricular conduction defects.</description><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>0022-0736</issn><issn>1532-8430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-h6DnrZPsV9ZbqVYLRRGqeAvZZAJZthtNtor_van14NHTwLz3m8c8Qi4YTBmw6qqbdtijHoPXKpgpByaSMAXBDsiElTnPRJHDIZkAcJ5BnVfH5CTGDgAaXvMJeZ3FiDFucBipt_RpTZfDiOFD9dQN9CWtg9PbXgU694PZ6tH5gd6gTZnxmr6o3hn1s0uwog_4SRc-bBJwRo6s6iOe_85T8ry4Xc_vs9Xj3XI-W2WaFdBkueJFXtUlNnUJZWOtqFjdYikKg9pYVRm0ZQGtNgCFaAVyUbcNs7oCDpa1-Sm53N99C_59i3GUnd-GIUVKzqpaQNXkTXJd7106-BgDWvkW3EaFL8lA7pqUnfzbpNw1udNSkwm-2cOY_vhwGGTUDgeNxoVESOPdf858A8Y0gy0</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula</title><author>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1409-3a243675e975059ff8617be584decdfa6def540bcd0048b8e287b91fc6020f1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, Miguel Ángel Cobos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1184</epage><pages>1184-1184</pages><issn>0022-0736</issn><eissn>1532-8430</eissn><abstract>Background: QT interval prolongation is a marker of abnormal repolarization. In patients with major ventricular conduction defects (VCD), the assessment of ventricular repolarization remains controversial. Use of special indexes, or 2-parameters formulas for QTc and JTc has been proposed. However, the complexity of these methods precludes its wide clinical application. We have proposed (AHA 2012) a very simple formula for QT correction: QTc=2QT/((l +RR)). We propose that this expression can be used for the evaluation of repolarization across all the spectrum of QRS duration (QRSD), including patients with ventricular conduction defects. Methods: We have analyzed the data from a random subset (19023 subjects, including 434 VCD cases) of the ECC-ViEW II, a Korean electrocardiogram database. We calculated the QTc interval using 4 correction formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Framinham, and our new formula). We correlated the QTc values of each method with the RR interval and QRS duration (QRSD), performing a multiple regression analysis . An ideal correction formula should minimize the coefficient of determination (R2). Results: We found that our formula provides the best correction. (R2 for the new formula 0, 07, Bazett 0,16, Fridericia 0,22, Framinham 0,12). Using the new formula in the subjects with normal ventricular conduction, the mean QTc is 0,416 +- 0,023 with an upper 5% normal limit of 0,459. In the VCD cases these values are 30 ms higher (mean 0,446 +- 0,028, upper 5% normal limit 0,489) Conclusion: We propose a very simple, universal formula for the evaluation of QT interval in patients with normal conduction and in patients with major ventricular conduction defects.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.081</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0736 |
ispartof | Journal of electrocardiology, 2018-11, Vol.51 (6), p.1184-1184 |
issn | 0022-0736 1532-8430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2167806939 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Cardiac arrhythmia Data analysis Electrocardiography Patients |
title | Assessment of QT Interval in Ventricular Conduction Defects: Validation of a New Formula |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A22%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20QT%20Interval%20in%20Ventricular%20Conduction%20Defects:%20Validation%20of%20a%20New%20Formula&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electrocardiology&rft.au=Gil,%20Miguel%20%C3%81ngel%20Cobos&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1184&rft.pages=1184-1184&rft.issn=0022-0736&rft.eissn=1532-8430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.10.081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2167806939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1409-3a243675e975059ff8617be584decdfa6def540bcd0048b8e287b91fc6020f1b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167806939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |