Loading…

Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge

This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of educational technology 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198
Main Authors: Cohen, Anat, Shimony, Udi, Nachmias, Rafi, Soffer, Tal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3
container_end_page 198
container_issue 1
container_start_page 177
container_title British journal of educational technology
container_volume 50
creator Cohen, Anat
Shimony, Udi
Nachmias, Rafi
Soffer, Tal
description This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjet.12670
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2169574222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1203546</ericid><sourcerecordid>2169574222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwYY9kiR1Sih9x7CxLFR5VUVmUteU4dpuSJsVOqcqK3-D3-BJcglgym9HonrmjuQCcYzTAoa7zpWkHmCQcHYAejhMeCUbZIeghhHiEEabH4MT7ZRgRZXEPPA11W74ZWBnlauP818cn1AvllG6NK99VWzY1LGv4OJ2OoG3cZuWhqgvYLkzp4NyEHdWaAr7UzbYyxdycgiOrKm_OfnsfPN9ms9F9NJnePYyGk0hTlqLIIsoNESKlOi9UKhLORJJaItJYMc5VEqOYxrlgRHBKOBG5Ekpri0VhRZFa2geXne_aNa8b41u5bDauDiclwUnKeEwICdRVR2nXeO-MlWtXrpTbSYzkPjG5T0z-JBbgiw4On-s_MBtjss8qCTru9G1Zmd0_TvJmnM06z2_48ndN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2169574222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Coventry: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Persistence ; Active Learning ; Analytics ; Classification ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Content Analysis ; Correlation ; Data Analysis ; Data mining ; Distance learning ; Dropouts ; Educational technology ; Group Discussion ; Learning Analytics ; Mass Instruction ; MOOCs ; Online Courses ; Student Attitudes ; Student Participation</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational technology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198</ispartof><rights>2018 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2019 British Educational Research Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1203546$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachmias, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><title>British journal of educational technology</title><description>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</description><subject>Academic Persistence</subject><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Analytics</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Dropouts</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Learning Analytics</subject><subject>Mass Instruction</subject><subject>MOOCs</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><issn>0007-1013</issn><issn>1467-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwYY9kiR1Sih9x7CxLFR5VUVmUteU4dpuSJsVOqcqK3-D3-BJcglgym9HonrmjuQCcYzTAoa7zpWkHmCQcHYAejhMeCUbZIeghhHiEEabH4MT7ZRgRZXEPPA11W74ZWBnlauP818cn1AvllG6NK99VWzY1LGv4OJ2OoG3cZuWhqgvYLkzp4NyEHdWaAr7UzbYyxdycgiOrKm_OfnsfPN9ms9F9NJnePYyGk0hTlqLIIsoNESKlOi9UKhLORJJaItJYMc5VEqOYxrlgRHBKOBG5Ekpri0VhRZFa2geXne_aNa8b41u5bDauDiclwUnKeEwICdRVR2nXeO-MlWtXrpTbSYzkPjG5T0z-JBbgiw4On-s_MBtjss8qCTru9G1Zmd0_TvJmnM06z2_48ndN</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Anat</creator><creator>Shimony, Udi</creator><creator>Nachmias, Rafi</creator><creator>Soffer, Tal</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><author>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Persistence</topic><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Analytics</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Dropouts</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Learning Analytics</topic><topic>Mass Instruction</topic><topic>MOOCs</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachmias, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Anat</au><au>Shimony, Udi</au><au>Nachmias, Rafi</au><au>Soffer, Tal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1203546</ericid><atitle>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>177-198</pages><issn>0007-1013</issn><eissn>1467-8535</eissn><abstract>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</abstract><cop>Coventry</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><doi>10.1111/bjet.12670</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1013
ispartof British journal of educational technology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198
issn 0007-1013
1467-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2169574222
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Academic Persistence
Active Learning
Analytics
Classification
Computer Mediated Communication
Content Analysis
Correlation
Data Analysis
Data mining
Distance learning
Dropouts
Educational technology
Group Discussion
Learning Analytics
Mass Instruction
MOOCs
Online Courses
Student Attitudes
Student Participation
title Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A52%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20learners%E2%80%99%20characterization%20in%20MOOC%20forums%20and%20their%20generated%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Cohen,%20Anat&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=177-198&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjet.12670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2169574222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2169574222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1203546&rfr_iscdi=true