Loading…
Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge
This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction d...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of educational technology 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3 |
container_end_page | 198 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | British journal of educational technology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Cohen, Anat Shimony, Udi Nachmias, Rafi Soffer, Tal |
description | This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjet.12670 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2169574222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1203546</ericid><sourcerecordid>2169574222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwYY9kiR1Sih9x7CxLFR5VUVmUteU4dpuSJsVOqcqK3-D3-BJcglgym9HonrmjuQCcYzTAoa7zpWkHmCQcHYAejhMeCUbZIeghhHiEEabH4MT7ZRgRZXEPPA11W74ZWBnlauP818cn1AvllG6NK99VWzY1LGv4OJ2OoG3cZuWhqgvYLkzp4NyEHdWaAr7UzbYyxdycgiOrKm_OfnsfPN9ms9F9NJnePYyGk0hTlqLIIsoNESKlOi9UKhLORJJaItJYMc5VEqOYxrlgRHBKOBG5Ekpri0VhRZFa2geXne_aNa8b41u5bDauDiclwUnKeEwICdRVR2nXeO-MlWtXrpTbSYzkPjG5T0z-JBbgiw4On-s_MBtjss8qCTru9G1Zmd0_TvJmnM06z2_48ndN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2169574222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Coventry: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Persistence ; Active Learning ; Analytics ; Classification ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Content Analysis ; Correlation ; Data Analysis ; Data mining ; Distance learning ; Dropouts ; Educational technology ; Group Discussion ; Learning Analytics ; Mass Instruction ; MOOCs ; Online Courses ; Student Attitudes ; Student Participation</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational technology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198</ispartof><rights>2018 British Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2019 British Educational Research Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1203546$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachmias, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><title>British journal of educational technology</title><description>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</description><subject>Academic Persistence</subject><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Analytics</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Dropouts</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Learning Analytics</subject><subject>Mass Instruction</subject><subject>MOOCs</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><issn>0007-1013</issn><issn>1467-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwYY9kiR1Sih9x7CxLFR5VUVmUteU4dpuSJsVOqcqK3-D3-BJcglgym9HonrmjuQCcYzTAoa7zpWkHmCQcHYAejhMeCUbZIeghhHiEEabH4MT7ZRgRZXEPPA11W74ZWBnlauP818cn1AvllG6NK99VWzY1LGv4OJ2OoG3cZuWhqgvYLkzp4NyEHdWaAr7UzbYyxdycgiOrKm_OfnsfPN9ms9F9NJnePYyGk0hTlqLIIsoNESKlOi9UKhLORJJaItJYMc5VEqOYxrlgRHBKOBG5Ekpri0VhRZFa2geXne_aNa8b41u5bDauDiclwUnKeEwICdRVR2nXeO-MlWtXrpTbSYzkPjG5T0z-JBbgiw4On-s_MBtjss8qCTru9G1Zmd0_TvJmnM06z2_48ndN</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Anat</creator><creator>Shimony, Udi</creator><creator>Nachmias, Rafi</creator><creator>Soffer, Tal</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</title><author>Cohen, Anat ; Shimony, Udi ; Nachmias, Rafi ; Soffer, Tal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Persistence</topic><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Analytics</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Dropouts</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Learning Analytics</topic><topic>Mass Instruction</topic><topic>MOOCs</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachmias, Rafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Tal</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Anat</au><au>Shimony, Udi</au><au>Nachmias, Rafi</au><au>Soffer, Tal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1203546</ericid><atitle>Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>177-198</pages><issn>0007-1013</issn><eissn>1467-8535</eissn><abstract>This study explores and characterizes learners' participation patterns in MOOC forums, as well as the factors that correlate with learners' participation. Educational data mining and learning analytics methods were used to retrieve and analyze the learners' interpersonal interaction data, which had accumulated in the Coursera log files. The content in the forums was categorized based on Henri's criteria and converted into quantitative values that could be compared and visualized. It was found that only 20% of the learners were collaborating in the forums throughout the entire course and were responsible for 50% of the total posts. A portion of them earned the name “Super Active.” The analyses not only demonstrated the volume of activity and its pattern but also revealed the content of the discussions, which helped to highlight the needs and reasons for students' usage of the forums. The content analysis showed intensity in the “Cognitive” and “Discipline” categories. Thus, forum participants benefit from discussions not only socially but disciplinarily and cognitively as well. Furthermore, even though a strong significant correlation was found between the learners’ completion status and their activity in the forums, a group of learners, who did not complete the course, was highly active.</abstract><cop>Coventry</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><doi>10.1111/bjet.12670</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1013 |
ispartof | British journal of educational technology, 2019-01, Vol.50 (1), p.177-198 |
issn | 0007-1013 1467-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2169574222 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Academic Persistence Active Learning Analytics Classification Computer Mediated Communication Content Analysis Correlation Data Analysis Data mining Distance learning Dropouts Educational technology Group Discussion Learning Analytics Mass Instruction MOOCs Online Courses Student Attitudes Student Participation |
title | Active learners’ characterization in MOOC forums and their generated knowledge |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A52%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20learners%E2%80%99%20characterization%20in%20MOOC%20forums%20and%20their%20generated%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Cohen,%20Anat&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=177-198&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjet.12670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2169574222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-f037e28893cbda98675869f2894a577a640434b8528732728ba8accf18df8d9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2169574222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1203546&rfr_iscdi=true |