Rotational biomechanics of the elite golf swing: benchmarks for amateurs

The purpose of this study was to determine biomechanical factors that may influence golf swing power generation. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were examined in 10 professional and 5 amateur male golfers. Upper-torso rotation, pelvic rotation, X-factor (relative hip-shoulder rotation), O-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied biomechanics 2011-08, Vol.27 (3), p.242-251
Main Authors: Meister, David W, Ladd, Amy L, Butler, Erin E, Zhao, Betty, Rogers, Andrew P, Ray, Conrad J, Rose, Jessica
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Benchmarking
Biomechanics
California
Female
Golf
Golf - physiology
Golf - standards
Humans
Joints - physiology
Male
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reference Values
Rotation
Task Performance and Analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to determine biomechanical factors that may influence golf swing power generation. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were examined in 10 professional and 5 amateur male golfers. Upper-torso rotation, pelvic rotation, X-factor (relative hip-shoulder rotation), O-factor (pelvic obliquity), S-factor (shoulder obliquity), and normalized free moment were assessed in relation to clubhead speed at impact (CSI). Among professional golfers, results revealed that peak free moment per kilogram, peak X-factor, and peak S-factor were highly consistent, with coefficients of variation of 6.8%, 7.4%, and 8.4%, respectively. Downswing was initiated by reversal of pelvic rotation, followed by reversal of upper-torso rotation. Peak X-factor preceded peak free moment in all swings for all golfers, and occurred during initial downswing. Peak free moment per kilogram, X-factor at impact, peak X-factor, and peak upper-torso rotation were highly correlated to CSI (median correlation coefficients of 0.943, 0.943, 0.900, and 0.900, respectively). Benchmark curves revealed kinematic and kinetic temporal and spatial differences of amateurs compared with professional golfers. For amateurs, the number of factors that fell outside 1-2 standard deviations of professional means increased with handicap. This study identified biomechanical factors highly correlated to golf swing power generation and may provide a basis for strategic training and injury prevention.
ISSN:1065-8483
1543-2688
DOI:10.1123/jab.27.3.242