Loading…
A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications
This study proposes a novel integration of a municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with a cyanobacterial nutrient removal process for sidestream wastewater treatment. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to determine the effectiveness and environmental performances of the integra...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Bioenergy research 2019-03, Vol.12 (1), p.217-228 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3 |
| container_end_page | 228 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 217 |
| container_title | Bioenergy research |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Quiroz-Arita, Carlos Sheehan, John J. Baral, Nawa Raj Hughes, Alexander Peers, Graham Hodgson, Brock Sharvelle, Sybil Bradley, Thomas H. |
| description | This study proposes a novel integration of a municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with a cyanobacterial nutrient removal process for sidestream wastewater treatment. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to determine the effectiveness and environmental performances of the integrated system. The LCA is populated by models of wastewater process engineering, material balance, cyanobacterial growth, and kinetics of anaerobic digestion. The cyanobacteria growth model incorporates chlorophyll synthesis, nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, centrate inhibition, and competition for nitrogen between cyanobacteria and nitrifiers. Modeling results are validated against experiments with
Synechocystis
sp. PCC6803 grown in sludge centrate. With a maximum specific growth rate of 1.09 day
−1
, the nitrogen removal rate of the proposed WWTF would be increased by 15% when compared to the baseline wastewater treatment facility with a biological nutrient removal process. Incorporating the cyanobacterial nutrient removal process as the sidestream wastewater treatment of a conventional activated sludge process reduces the total nitrogen concentrations discharged from the WWTF from 25.9 to 15.2 mg 1
−1
. Methane yield was found to be increased by 4% of the baseline value when cyanobacterial biomass was co-digested with the activated sludge. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were found to be reduced by 8% and 17%, respectively, relative to a baseline wastewater treatment facility. Overall, a cyanobacteria-based sidestream municipal wastewater treatment process could be an effective and environmentally sustainable biological nutrient removal process in the future addressing the water-energy-food nexus. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12155-019-9963-2 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2171274553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712242061</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712242061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhosoOKc_wLuC1535bJvLMfwYDBWd1yE9Ox0ZbTOTTti_N6PiEJRcJJw8T3I4b5JcUzKhhBS3gTIqZUaoypTKecZOkhFVXGWUCXb6c-biPLkIYUNITgRRo2Q5TWd707nKQI_emiZ9sysMvUfTpk-73lvs-vQVW_cZ7168AwwhNd0qnfchXdgaow8NpvN221gwvXVduEzOatMEvPrex8n7_d1y9pgtnh_ms-kiA17yPlOszI0CKTgYLjhDEGVhKoC8ZLKSvIC8Ehy5KglBKXJamLpa1RUoCQDG8HFyM7y79e5jF7vWG7fzXfxSM1pQVggp-ZFamwa17WrXewOtDaCnEYrzITmN1OQPKq4VthZch7WN9V8CHQTwLgSPtd562xq_15ToQyZ6yETHTPQhE82iwwYnRLZboz82_L_0BcAhjSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171274553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos ; Sheehan, John J. ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Hughes, Alexander ; Peers, Graham ; Hodgson, Brock ; Sharvelle, Sybil ; Bradley, Thomas H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos ; Sheehan, John J. ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Hughes, Alexander ; Peers, Graham ; Hodgson, Brock ; Sharvelle, Sybil ; Bradley, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposes a novel integration of a municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with a cyanobacterial nutrient removal process for sidestream wastewater treatment. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to determine the effectiveness and environmental performances of the integrated system. The LCA is populated by models of wastewater process engineering, material balance, cyanobacterial growth, and kinetics of anaerobic digestion. The cyanobacteria growth model incorporates chlorophyll synthesis, nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, centrate inhibition, and competition for nitrogen between cyanobacteria and nitrifiers. Modeling results are validated against experiments with
Synechocystis
sp. PCC6803 grown in sludge centrate. With a maximum specific growth rate of 1.09 day
−1
, the nitrogen removal rate of the proposed WWTF would be increased by 15% when compared to the baseline wastewater treatment facility with a biological nutrient removal process. Incorporating the cyanobacterial nutrient removal process as the sidestream wastewater treatment of a conventional activated sludge process reduces the total nitrogen concentrations discharged from the WWTF from 25.9 to 15.2 mg 1
−1
. Methane yield was found to be increased by 4% of the baseline value when cyanobacterial biomass was co-digested with the activated sludge. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were found to be reduced by 8% and 17%, respectively, relative to a baseline wastewater treatment facility. Overall, a cyanobacteria-based sidestream municipal wastewater treatment process could be an effective and environmentally sustainable biological nutrient removal process in the future addressing the water-energy-food nexus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12155-019-9963-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Activated sludge process ; Air pollution ; Air quality management ; Anaerobic digestion ; Anaerobic processes ; Analysis ; Biological activity ; Biological wastewater treatment ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chlorophyll ; Cyanobacteria ; Energy consumption ; Environmental performance ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Growth models ; Growth rate ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; Life Sciences ; Material balance ; Municipal wastewater ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen removal ; Nutrient removal ; Photosynthesis ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Sciences ; Process engineering ; Purification ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Sludge digestion ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water treatment ; Water treatment plants ; Water utilities ; Wood Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>Bioenergy research, 2019-03, Vol.12 (1), p.217-228</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>BioEnergy Research is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6003-4606</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2171274553/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2171274553?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Nawa Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peers, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Brock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharvelle, Sybil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><title>A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications</title><title>Bioenergy research</title><addtitle>Bioenerg. Res</addtitle><description>This study proposes a novel integration of a municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with a cyanobacterial nutrient removal process for sidestream wastewater treatment. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to determine the effectiveness and environmental performances of the integrated system. The LCA is populated by models of wastewater process engineering, material balance, cyanobacterial growth, and kinetics of anaerobic digestion. The cyanobacteria growth model incorporates chlorophyll synthesis, nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, centrate inhibition, and competition for nitrogen between cyanobacteria and nitrifiers. Modeling results are validated against experiments with
Synechocystis
sp. PCC6803 grown in sludge centrate. With a maximum specific growth rate of 1.09 day
−1
, the nitrogen removal rate of the proposed WWTF would be increased by 15% when compared to the baseline wastewater treatment facility with a biological nutrient removal process. Incorporating the cyanobacterial nutrient removal process as the sidestream wastewater treatment of a conventional activated sludge process reduces the total nitrogen concentrations discharged from the WWTF from 25.9 to 15.2 mg 1
−1
. Methane yield was found to be increased by 4% of the baseline value when cyanobacterial biomass was co-digested with the activated sludge. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were found to be reduced by 8% and 17%, respectively, relative to a baseline wastewater treatment facility. Overall, a cyanobacteria-based sidestream municipal wastewater treatment process could be an effective and environmentally sustainable biological nutrient removal process in the future addressing the water-energy-food nexus.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Activated sludge process</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality management</subject><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobic processes</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Material balance</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Process engineering</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge digestion</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><subject>Water utilities</subject><subject>Wood Science & Technology</subject><issn>1939-1234</issn><issn>1939-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhosoOKc_wLuC1535bJvLMfwYDBWd1yE9Ox0ZbTOTTti_N6PiEJRcJJw8T3I4b5JcUzKhhBS3gTIqZUaoypTKecZOkhFVXGWUCXb6c-biPLkIYUNITgRRo2Q5TWd707nKQI_emiZ9sysMvUfTpk-73lvs-vQVW_cZ7168AwwhNd0qnfchXdgaow8NpvN221gwvXVduEzOatMEvPrex8n7_d1y9pgtnh_ms-kiA17yPlOszI0CKTgYLjhDEGVhKoC8ZLKSvIC8Ehy5KglBKXJamLpa1RUoCQDG8HFyM7y79e5jF7vWG7fzXfxSM1pQVggp-ZFamwa17WrXewOtDaCnEYrzITmN1OQPKq4VthZch7WN9V8CHQTwLgSPtd562xq_15ToQyZ6yETHTPQhE82iwwYnRLZboz82_L_0BcAhjSE</recordid><startdate>20190315</startdate><enddate>20190315</enddate><creator>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos</creator><creator>Sheehan, John J.</creator><creator>Baral, Nawa Raj</creator><creator>Hughes, Alexander</creator><creator>Peers, Graham</creator><creator>Hodgson, Brock</creator><creator>Sharvelle, Sybil</creator><creator>Bradley, Thomas H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-4606</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190315</creationdate><title>A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications</title><author>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos ; Sheehan, John J. ; Baral, Nawa Raj ; Hughes, Alexander ; Peers, Graham ; Hodgson, Brock ; Sharvelle, Sybil ; Bradley, Thomas H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Activated sludge process</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality management</topic><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobic processes</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Material balance</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Process engineering</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge digestion</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><topic>Water utilities</topic><topic>Wood Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baral, Nawa Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peers, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Brock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharvelle, Sybil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quiroz-Arita, Carlos</au><au>Sheehan, John J.</au><au>Baral, Nawa Raj</au><au>Hughes, Alexander</au><au>Peers, Graham</au><au>Hodgson, Brock</au><au>Sharvelle, Sybil</au><au>Bradley, Thomas H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications</atitle><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle><stitle>Bioenerg. Res</stitle><date>2019-03-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>217-228</pages><issn>1939-1234</issn><eissn>1939-1242</eissn><abstract>This study proposes a novel integration of a municipal wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) with a cyanobacterial nutrient removal process for sidestream wastewater treatment. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to determine the effectiveness and environmental performances of the integrated system. The LCA is populated by models of wastewater process engineering, material balance, cyanobacterial growth, and kinetics of anaerobic digestion. The cyanobacteria growth model incorporates chlorophyll synthesis, nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, centrate inhibition, and competition for nitrogen between cyanobacteria and nitrifiers. Modeling results are validated against experiments with
Synechocystis
sp. PCC6803 grown in sludge centrate. With a maximum specific growth rate of 1.09 day
−1
, the nitrogen removal rate of the proposed WWTF would be increased by 15% when compared to the baseline wastewater treatment facility with a biological nutrient removal process. Incorporating the cyanobacterial nutrient removal process as the sidestream wastewater treatment of a conventional activated sludge process reduces the total nitrogen concentrations discharged from the WWTF from 25.9 to 15.2 mg 1
−1
. Methane yield was found to be increased by 4% of the baseline value when cyanobacterial biomass was co-digested with the activated sludge. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were found to be reduced by 8% and 17%, respectively, relative to a baseline wastewater treatment facility. Overall, a cyanobacteria-based sidestream municipal wastewater treatment process could be an effective and environmentally sustainable biological nutrient removal process in the future addressing the water-energy-food nexus.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12155-019-9963-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-4606</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1939-1234 |
| ispartof | Bioenergy research, 2019-03, Vol.12 (1), p.217-228 |
| issn | 1939-1234 1939-1242 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2171274553 |
| source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
| subjects | Activated sludge Activated sludge process Air pollution Air quality management Anaerobic digestion Anaerobic processes Analysis Biological activity Biological wastewater treatment Biomedical and Life Sciences Chlorophyll Cyanobacteria Energy consumption Environmental performance Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Growth models Growth rate Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycle engineering Life cycles Life Sciences Material balance Municipal wastewater Nitrogen Nitrogen removal Nutrient removal Photosynthesis Plant Breeding/Biotechnology Plant Ecology Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Sciences Process engineering Purification Sewage Sludge Sludge digestion Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water treatment Water treatment plants Water utilities Wood Science & Technology |
| title | A Cyanobacterial Sidestream Nutrient Removal Process and Its Life Cycle Implications |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cyanobacterial%20Sidestream%20Nutrient%20Removal%20Process%20and%20Its%20Life%20Cycle%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Bioenergy%20research&rft.au=Quiroz-Arita,%20Carlos&rft.date=2019-03-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=217-228&rft.issn=1939-1234&rft.eissn=1939-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12155-019-9963-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712242061%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9286a9c543ca3432ec487abcc6825b537c6b43e39800e54617afbdfbc95cccaa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171274553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712242061&rfr_iscdi=true |