Loading…

Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?

Objective: To assess the effects of exposure time and gauge of Foley catheters in biofilm formation. Method: In vitro study with samples of Foley catheter fragments made of siliconized latex of different gauges (#14 and #16 French gauge). Artit cial urine was produced, which was inoculated with Stap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta paulista de enfermagem 2018-09, Vol.31 (5), p.535-541
Main Authors: Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim, Monteiro, Rachel Maciel, Machado, Marinila Buzanelo, Ferreira, Adriano Menis, Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa, Watanabe, Evandro, Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo, Moura, Maria Eliete Batista
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 541
container_issue 5
container_start_page 535
container_title Acta paulista de enfermagem
container_volume 31
creator Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim
Monteiro, Rachel Maciel
Machado, Marinila Buzanelo
Ferreira, Adriano Menis
Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa
Watanabe, Evandro
Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo
Moura, Maria Eliete Batista
description Objective: To assess the effects of exposure time and gauge of Foley catheters in biofilm formation. Method: In vitro study with samples of Foley catheter fragments made of siliconized latex of different gauges (#14 and #16 French gauge). Artit cial urine was produced, which was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) standard bacteria, incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and 72 hours. The material was analyzed by means of culture (bacterial load) and scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was no difference in bacterial load of biofilms formed in Foley catheter surfaces with regard to different gauges (p > 0.05). On the other hand, exposure time (24 hours and 72 hours) was a determining factor for P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Exposure time had an effect on P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters, regardless of gauges.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0194201800074
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2171580435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2171580435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21715804353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNir0OgjAURhujifjzAk5NnNF7CwRwcTAaH0BnUrHFEmixLYm-vQzG2emcnO8jZIWwwSSHLeYZCwHzmAFmAJDGIxL84pgEgBCFDAGmZOZcDZCkKUBAzlerNLdvWnL_EF7Y3WCaildnXG8F9aoVlOs7rXhfDSalKD29KSMVbVoqjW25V0bvF2QieePE8ss5WZ-Ol8M57Kx59sL5oja91cNUMEwxySCOkui_1weIA0Ii</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171580435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim ; Monteiro, Rachel Maciel ; Machado, Marinila Buzanelo ; Ferreira, Adriano Menis ; Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa ; Watanabe, Evandro ; Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo ; Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</creator><creatorcontrib>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim ; Monteiro, Rachel Maciel ; Machado, Marinila Buzanelo ; Ferreira, Adriano Menis ; Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa ; Watanabe, Evandro ; Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo ; Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess the effects of exposure time and gauge of Foley catheters in biofilm formation. Method: In vitro study with samples of Foley catheter fragments made of siliconized latex of different gauges (#14 and #16 French gauge). Artit cial urine was produced, which was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) standard bacteria, incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and 72 hours. The material was analyzed by means of culture (bacterial load) and scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was no difference in bacterial load of biofilms formed in Foley catheter surfaces with regard to different gauges (p &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, exposure time (24 hours and 72 hours) was a determining factor for P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Exposure time had an effect on P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters, regardless of gauges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-2100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1982-0194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1982-0194201800074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sao Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biofilms ; Catheters ; Exposure ; Fragmentation ; Gauges ; Latex ; Medical instruments ; Prevention ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Siliconizing ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Urinary tract diseases ; Urinary tract infections ; Urine ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Acta paulista de enfermagem, 2018-09, Vol.31 (5), p.535-541</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2171580435/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2171580435?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Rachel Maciel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Marinila Buzanelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Adriano Menis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Evandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?</title><title>Acta paulista de enfermagem</title><description>Objective: To assess the effects of exposure time and gauge of Foley catheters in biofilm formation. Method: In vitro study with samples of Foley catheter fragments made of siliconized latex of different gauges (#14 and #16 French gauge). Artit cial urine was produced, which was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) standard bacteria, incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and 72 hours. The material was analyzed by means of culture (bacterial load) and scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was no difference in bacterial load of biofilms formed in Foley catheter surfaces with regard to different gauges (p &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, exposure time (24 hours and 72 hours) was a determining factor for P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Exposure time had an effect on P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters, regardless of gauges.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Latex</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Siliconizing</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>0103-2100</issn><issn>1982-0194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNir0OgjAURhujifjzAk5NnNF7CwRwcTAaH0BnUrHFEmixLYm-vQzG2emcnO8jZIWwwSSHLeYZCwHzmAFmAJDGIxL84pgEgBCFDAGmZOZcDZCkKUBAzlerNLdvWnL_EF7Y3WCaildnXG8F9aoVlOs7rXhfDSalKD29KSMVbVoqjW25V0bvF2QieePE8ss5WZ-Ol8M57Kx59sL5oja91cNUMEwxySCOkui_1weIA0Ii</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim</creator><creator>Monteiro, Rachel Maciel</creator><creator>Machado, Marinila Buzanelo</creator><creator>Ferreira, Adriano Menis</creator><creator>Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa</creator><creator>Watanabe, Evandro</creator><creator>Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo</creator><creator>Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</creator><general>Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?</title><author>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim ; Monteiro, Rachel Maciel ; Machado, Marinila Buzanelo ; Ferreira, Adriano Menis ; Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa ; Watanabe, Evandro ; Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo ; Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21715804353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Latex</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Siliconizing</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Rachel Maciel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Marinila Buzanelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Adriano Menis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Evandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Acta paulista de enfermagem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batista, Odinéa Maria Amorim</au><au>Monteiro, Rachel Maciel</au><au>Machado, Marinila Buzanelo</au><au>Ferreira, Adriano Menis</au><au>Valle, Andreia Rodrigues Moura da Costa</au><au>Watanabe, Evandro</au><au>Madeiro, Maria Zélia de Araújo</au><au>Moura, Maria Eliete Batista</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?</atitle><jtitle>Acta paulista de enfermagem</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>535-541</pages><issn>0103-2100</issn><eissn>1982-0194</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess the effects of exposure time and gauge of Foley catheters in biofilm formation. Method: In vitro study with samples of Foley catheter fragments made of siliconized latex of different gauges (#14 and #16 French gauge). Artit cial urine was produced, which was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) standard bacteria, incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours and 72 hours. The material was analyzed by means of culture (bacterial load) and scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was no difference in bacterial load of biofilms formed in Foley catheter surfaces with regard to different gauges (p &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, exposure time (24 hours and 72 hours) was a determining factor for P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Exposure time had an effect on P aeruginosa biofilm formation in Foley catheters, regardless of gauges.</abstract><cop>Sao Paulo</cop><pub>Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem</pub><doi>10.1590/1982-0194201800074</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-2100
ispartof Acta paulista de enfermagem, 2018-09, Vol.31 (5), p.535-541
issn 0103-2100
1982-0194
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2171580435
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); SciELO
subjects Bacteria
Biofilms
Catheters
Exposure
Fragmentation
Gauges
Latex
Medical instruments
Prevention
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Scanning electron microscopy
Siliconizing
Staphylococcus aureus
Urinary tract diseases
Urinary tract infections
Urine
Urogenital system
title Urinary catheter: can exposure time and gauge affect biofi lm formation?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20catheter:%20can%20exposure%20time%20and%20gauge%20affect%20biofi%20lm%20formation?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20paulista%20de%20enfermagem&rft.au=Batista,%20Odin%C3%A9a%20Maria%20Amorim&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=535-541&rft.issn=0103-2100&rft.eissn=1982-0194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1982-0194201800074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2171580435%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21715804353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171580435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true