What “Brussels” means by structural reforms: empty signifier or constructive ambiguity?

This paper deals with the ideas underpinning the EU’s socio-economic governance by focusing on the notion of structural reforms in the framework of the European Semester. It asks which policy ideas are constitutive of the notion of structural reforms in the EU and whether said meaning has changed ov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) Basingstoke, England), 2019-02, Vol.17 (1), p.92-111
Main Authors: Crespy, Amandine, Vanheuverzwijn, Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambiguity
Comparative Politics
Content analysis
Deregulation
European Politics
Flexibility
Governance
Inequality
International finance
International Relations
Investments
Labor market
Markets
Meaning
Neoliberalism
Original Article
Political Science
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Public administration
Public Finance
Reforms
Service industries
Socioeconomic factors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper deals with the ideas underpinning the EU’s socio-economic governance by focusing on the notion of structural reforms in the framework of the European Semester. It asks which policy ideas are constitutive of the notion of structural reforms in the EU and whether said meaning has changed over time to tackle slow growth and rising inequalities. Our demonstration is mainly grounded on a content analysis of all European Semester documents since 2011 (including Annual Growth Surveys, Alert Mechanism Reports, Euro Area Recommendations, and Country-Specific Recommendations) and completed by a short series of interviews with European and national officials involved in the European Semester. We find that, despite floating meaning, the notion of structural reforms exhibits a persisting core consisting of typically neoliberal policy recipes such as the liberalisation of products and services markets, the deregulation of labour markets, and public administration reform. At the same time, structural reforms have covered eclectic—if not contradictory—policy ideas, thus accompanying a discursive turn towards more fiscal flexibility and (social) investment. Rather than a constructive dynamic towards a renewed agenda, such ambiguity, we argue, reflects a fundamental, asymmetric ongoing battle of ideas within the EU.
ISSN:1472-4790
1740-388X
DOI:10.1057/s41295-017-0111-0