Loading…

Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output

The study examined the role of access to online databases as the basis for faculty research output in six universities (comprising two each of federal, state and private) in two Southwestern states in Nigeria. A descriptive research design guided the study. Multistage sampling procedures including p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Library philosophy and practice 2018-11, p.1-21
Main Authors: Iroaganachi, Mercy A, Izuagbe, Roland
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 21
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Library philosophy and practice
container_volume
creator Iroaganachi, Mercy A
Izuagbe, Roland
description The study examined the role of access to online databases as the basis for faculty research output in six universities (comprising two each of federal, state and private) in two Southwestern states in Nigeria. A descriptive research design guided the study. Multistage sampling procedures including purposive, stratification, randomization as well as proportionate sampling techniques were employed to select 339 faculty members who provided the data for the study. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Of the 339 copies of the questionnaires administered, 89 per cent were retrieved fully completed and found usable. The research questions that guided the study were analyzed using inferential statistics. Findings revealed that HINARI, ProQuest, JSTOR, and EBSCOhost were the most regularly accessible online databases. Incessant power supply and lack of downloadable full-text posed the greatest threats to online databases access. Similarly, the study found that the provision of full-text of most relevant research materials, steady power supply and acquisition of information literacy skills were the most effective ways of addressing online databases access constraints. Accordingly, the study recommended adequate funding of university libraries, provision of alternative means of power generation and increased user education for maximum exploitation of subscribed databases.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2173547062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2173547062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21735470623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr8KwjAQgPEgCNY_73DgXIgXa8GtqMWtIu7ljFdsKU3NJYNvr4MP4PQNv2-ikk2GmGpEnKm5SKc1GqNNoorCWhaB4KAa-nZgOFKgOwnLHi6eH62lwNA4DyXZ2Ic3XFmYvH1CFcMYw1JNG-qFV78u1Lo83Q7ndPTuFVlC3bnohy_VuMlNts31Ds1_1werDjgr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2173547062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Iroaganachi, Mercy A ; Izuagbe, Roland</creator><creatorcontrib>Iroaganachi, Mercy A ; Izuagbe, Roland</creatorcontrib><description>The study examined the role of access to online databases as the basis for faculty research output in six universities (comprising two each of federal, state and private) in two Southwestern states in Nigeria. A descriptive research design guided the study. Multistage sampling procedures including purposive, stratification, randomization as well as proportionate sampling techniques were employed to select 339 faculty members who provided the data for the study. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Of the 339 copies of the questionnaires administered, 89 per cent were retrieved fully completed and found usable. The research questions that guided the study were analyzed using inferential statistics. Findings revealed that HINARI, ProQuest, JSTOR, and EBSCOhost were the most regularly accessible online databases. Incessant power supply and lack of downloadable full-text posed the greatest threats to online databases access. Similarly, the study found that the provision of full-text of most relevant research materials, steady power supply and acquisition of information literacy skills were the most effective ways of addressing online databases access constraints. Accordingly, the study recommended adequate funding of university libraries, provision of alternative means of power generation and increased user education for maximum exploitation of subscribed databases.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1522-0222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lincoln: Library Philosophy and Practice</publisher><subject>Academic libraries ; Access to information ; Consortia ; Descriptive research ; Higher education ; Information literacy ; Information professionals ; Information sources ; Internet resources ; Librarians ; Library and information science ; Medical libraries ; Online data bases ; Power supply ; Quality ; User training</subject><ispartof>Library philosophy and practice, 2018-11, p.1-21</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2173547062/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2173547062?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21381,21394,25753,27305,33611,33906,34135,37012,43733,43892,44590,74221,74409,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iroaganachi, Mercy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izuagbe, Roland</creatorcontrib><title>Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output</title><title>Library philosophy and practice</title><description>The study examined the role of access to online databases as the basis for faculty research output in six universities (comprising two each of federal, state and private) in two Southwestern states in Nigeria. A descriptive research design guided the study. Multistage sampling procedures including purposive, stratification, randomization as well as proportionate sampling techniques were employed to select 339 faculty members who provided the data for the study. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Of the 339 copies of the questionnaires administered, 89 per cent were retrieved fully completed and found usable. The research questions that guided the study were analyzed using inferential statistics. Findings revealed that HINARI, ProQuest, JSTOR, and EBSCOhost were the most regularly accessible online databases. Incessant power supply and lack of downloadable full-text posed the greatest threats to online databases access. Similarly, the study found that the provision of full-text of most relevant research materials, steady power supply and acquisition of information literacy skills were the most effective ways of addressing online databases access constraints. Accordingly, the study recommended adequate funding of university libraries, provision of alternative means of power generation and increased user education for maximum exploitation of subscribed databases.</description><subject>Academic libraries</subject><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Descriptive research</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Information professionals</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Library and information science</subject><subject>Medical libraries</subject><subject>Online data bases</subject><subject>Power supply</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>User training</subject><issn>1522-0222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr8KwjAQgPEgCNY_73DgXIgXa8GtqMWtIu7ljFdsKU3NJYNvr4MP4PQNv2-ikk2GmGpEnKm5SKc1GqNNoorCWhaB4KAa-nZgOFKgOwnLHi6eH62lwNA4DyXZ2Ic3XFmYvH1CFcMYw1JNG-qFV78u1Lo83Q7ndPTuFVlC3bnohy_VuMlNts31Ds1_1werDjgr</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Iroaganachi, Mercy A</creator><creator>Izuagbe, Roland</creator><general>Library Philosophy and Practice</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output</title><author>Iroaganachi, Mercy A ; Izuagbe, Roland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21735470623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic libraries</topic><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Descriptive research</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Information professionals</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Library and information science</topic><topic>Medical libraries</topic><topic>Online data bases</topic><topic>Power supply</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>User training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iroaganachi, Mercy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izuagbe, Roland</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Library philosophy and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iroaganachi, Mercy A</au><au>Izuagbe, Roland</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output</atitle><jtitle>Library philosophy and practice</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><eissn>1522-0222</eissn><abstract>The study examined the role of access to online databases as the basis for faculty research output in six universities (comprising two each of federal, state and private) in two Southwestern states in Nigeria. A descriptive research design guided the study. Multistage sampling procedures including purposive, stratification, randomization as well as proportionate sampling techniques were employed to select 339 faculty members who provided the data for the study. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Of the 339 copies of the questionnaires administered, 89 per cent were retrieved fully completed and found usable. The research questions that guided the study were analyzed using inferential statistics. Findings revealed that HINARI, ProQuest, JSTOR, and EBSCOhost were the most regularly accessible online databases. Incessant power supply and lack of downloadable full-text posed the greatest threats to online databases access. Similarly, the study found that the provision of full-text of most relevant research materials, steady power supply and acquisition of information literacy skills were the most effective ways of addressing online databases access constraints. Accordingly, the study recommended adequate funding of university libraries, provision of alternative means of power generation and increased user education for maximum exploitation of subscribed databases.</abstract><cop>Lincoln</cop><pub>Library Philosophy and Practice</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1522-0222
ispartof Library philosophy and practice, 2018-11, p.1-21
issn 1522-0222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2173547062
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Library & Information Science Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Academic libraries
Access to information
Consortia
Descriptive research
Higher education
Information literacy
Information professionals
Information sources
Internet resources
Librarians
Library and information science
Medical libraries
Online data bases
Power supply
Quality
User training
title Access to Online Databases: Predicate for Faculty Research Output
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20Online%20Databases:%20Predicate%20for%20Faculty%20Research%20Output&rft.jtitle=Library%20philosophy%20and%20practice&rft.au=Iroaganachi,%20Mercy%20A&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.eissn=1522-0222&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2173547062%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21735470623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2173547062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true