Loading…
Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport
Second, are the chromosomal problems. Accuracy of Barr Body tests depends on the expertise of the technician. In addition, a number of sex chromosomal and genetic conditions can result in Barr Body results at odds with other indicators. A normal male (XY) has a penis present and no Barr Bodies; a Tu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian woman studies 2002-12, Vol.21 (3), p.36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Canadian woman studies |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Kirby, Sandra Huebner, Judith |
description | Second, are the chromosomal problems. Accuracy of Barr Body tests depends on the expertise of the technician. In addition, a number of sex chromosomal and genetic conditions can result in Barr Body results at odds with other indicators. A normal male (XY) has a penis present and no Barr Bodies; a Turners female (XO) has no penis and no Barr bodies. On the other hand, a normal female (XX) has no penis and has one Barr Body, while a Klinefelters male (XXY) has a penis and has one Barr Body. Thus on the basis of the Barr Body test, a Turners female would not be verified and would be unable to participate in women's competition while a Klinefelters male would be verified female and would be permitted to compete. Likewise, women with androgen insensitivity (testicular feminization) syndrome appear and act female. In fact, these individuals often display "ideal" female figures. They have always been treated as females, behave like females, and consider themselves female; however their karyotype is XY and they have no Barr Bodies and would be disqualified from competition in women's events on that basis. Sport is a gendered social world that is bifurcated along the gender lines. There is an internal logic to sport, a logic with several strands. One strand is that sport prepares boys to be men. There are masculine sports such as football and ice hockey where boys can be boys becoming men--and single sex competition ensures that "girls don't challenge boys." The second strand is that sport for males has been called sexuality suppressed by militarism (McKay). Sport idealizes things heterosexual and is homophobic to a great degree (Griffen). Some male athletes put on public displays of sexual prowess, establishing competitions for sexual titles. These competitions, including the practice of hazing or initiation, include heterosexual and sometimes hyper-heterosexual behaviours and expressions of attitudes. Female athletes appear to be stereotyped as either "the girl next door" or a lesbian. Despite the fact of women's century long competition is sport, excellent female athletes are still called tomboys, amazons and dykes, the inference being that if females are good athletes then they cannot be real women. The third strand in the internal logic of sport is that it is a site for the reinforcement of the sexual division of labour (Thompson). Within this, female athletes put on the public performance of being feminine girls and women in sports such as rhythmic gymnas-tic |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217474379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A88761578</galeid><sourcerecordid>A88761578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1949-6d2a2515a5110c600943e289bd0fe3895eccf9d1f64de17e0d329de2f8b6057a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzT1PwzAQBuAMIFEK_8EwMRDJH0kcs5UKSqUKBsocOfE5uAQ7jR2p_HuMylCkDtwNJ7169N5JMsGcsJRRlp8l595vcByG-SRZrmX3YWyLZO3GgDzs7lBtXOfaLyStQuEdkHeNkR0yNsDQDxBkMM565PQPjzHyvRvCRXKqZefh8vdOk7fHh_X8KV29LJbz2SptichEWigqaU5ymROCmwJjkTGgpagV1sBKkUPTaKGILjIFhANWjAoFVJd1gXMu2TS53vf2g9uO4EO1ceNg48uKEp7xjHER0e0etbKDyljtwiCbFiwMsnMWtInxrCx5QXJeRn51hDe92VYHJj1i4ir4NM2xzps_PpIAu9DK0ftq-fr8b3q_OKDff4OMQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217474379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport</title><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Kirby, Sandra ; Huebner, Judith</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sandra ; Huebner, Judith</creatorcontrib><description>Second, are the chromosomal problems. Accuracy of Barr Body tests depends on the expertise of the technician. In addition, a number of sex chromosomal and genetic conditions can result in Barr Body results at odds with other indicators. A normal male (XY) has a penis present and no Barr Bodies; a Turners female (XO) has no penis and no Barr bodies. On the other hand, a normal female (XX) has no penis and has one Barr Body, while a Klinefelters male (XXY) has a penis and has one Barr Body. Thus on the basis of the Barr Body test, a Turners female would not be verified and would be unable to participate in women's competition while a Klinefelters male would be verified female and would be permitted to compete. Likewise, women with androgen insensitivity (testicular feminization) syndrome appear and act female. In fact, these individuals often display "ideal" female figures. They have always been treated as females, behave like females, and consider themselves female; however their karyotype is XY and they have no Barr Bodies and would be disqualified from competition in women's events on that basis. Sport is a gendered social world that is bifurcated along the gender lines. There is an internal logic to sport, a logic with several strands. One strand is that sport prepares boys to be men. There are masculine sports such as football and ice hockey where boys can be boys becoming men--and single sex competition ensures that "girls don't challenge boys." The second strand is that sport for males has been called sexuality suppressed by militarism (McKay). Sport idealizes things heterosexual and is homophobic to a great degree (Griffen). Some male athletes put on public displays of sexual prowess, establishing competitions for sexual titles. These competitions, including the practice of hazing or initiation, include heterosexual and sometimes hyper-heterosexual behaviours and expressions of attitudes. Female athletes appear to be stereotyped as either "the girl next door" or a lesbian. Despite the fact of women's century long competition is sport, excellent female athletes are still called tomboys, amazons and dykes, the inference being that if females are good athletes then they cannot be real women. The third strand in the internal logic of sport is that it is a site for the reinforcement of the sexual division of labour (Thompson). Within this, female athletes put on the public performance of being feminine girls and women in sports such as rhythmic gymnas-tics and synchronized swimming. So too, women do lots of the invisible work of sport (e.g., driving children to practice, sitting on volunteer boards, fund-raising, creating policy, lobbying for the end of discriminations in sport) and proportionately less of the high profile work in sport (e.g., as members of the IOC or of the International Federations representing sport). These three strands ensure the continuance of male stream sport where women can take on supportive junior-partnership roles. Given the male texture of the sport context, the sport world remains largely unable to accept the athletic potential among its many female participants, choosing instead to question their sex, gender and sexuality. When girls and women do well in sport they cross some invisible threshold where their performances and their sex, gender, and sexuality are scrutinized. The "she throws like a boy" syndrome emerges. And, if she throws like a boy, it is not a huge leap to ask "is she a boy?" If she looks very strong and muscular and acts in an athletic manner, is she not feminine but masculine instead, not female but male?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0713-3235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Downsview: Canadian Woman Studies</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Athletic ability ; Attitudes ; Biology ; Children ; Gender identity ; Inference ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Logic ; Physiological aspects ; Reinforcement ; Sex (Biology) ; Sex chromosome abnormalities ; Sex discrimination against women ; Sexuality ; Sports ; Stereotypes ; Testing ; Titles ; Women</subject><ispartof>Canadian woman studies, 2002-12, Vol.21 (3), p.36</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Canadian Woman Studies</rights><rights>Copyright Inanna Publications and Education Inc. Winter 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/217474379?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,62661,62662,62677</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Judith</creatorcontrib><title>Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport</title><title>Canadian woman studies</title><description>Second, are the chromosomal problems. Accuracy of Barr Body tests depends on the expertise of the technician. In addition, a number of sex chromosomal and genetic conditions can result in Barr Body results at odds with other indicators. A normal male (XY) has a penis present and no Barr Bodies; a Turners female (XO) has no penis and no Barr bodies. On the other hand, a normal female (XX) has no penis and has one Barr Body, while a Klinefelters male (XXY) has a penis and has one Barr Body. Thus on the basis of the Barr Body test, a Turners female would not be verified and would be unable to participate in women's competition while a Klinefelters male would be verified female and would be permitted to compete. Likewise, women with androgen insensitivity (testicular feminization) syndrome appear and act female. In fact, these individuals often display "ideal" female figures. They have always been treated as females, behave like females, and consider themselves female; however their karyotype is XY and they have no Barr Bodies and would be disqualified from competition in women's events on that basis. Sport is a gendered social world that is bifurcated along the gender lines. There is an internal logic to sport, a logic with several strands. One strand is that sport prepares boys to be men. There are masculine sports such as football and ice hockey where boys can be boys becoming men--and single sex competition ensures that "girls don't challenge boys." The second strand is that sport for males has been called sexuality suppressed by militarism (McKay). Sport idealizes things heterosexual and is homophobic to a great degree (Griffen). Some male athletes put on public displays of sexual prowess, establishing competitions for sexual titles. These competitions, including the practice of hazing or initiation, include heterosexual and sometimes hyper-heterosexual behaviours and expressions of attitudes. Female athletes appear to be stereotyped as either "the girl next door" or a lesbian. Despite the fact of women's century long competition is sport, excellent female athletes are still called tomboys, amazons and dykes, the inference being that if females are good athletes then they cannot be real women. The third strand in the internal logic of sport is that it is a site for the reinforcement of the sexual division of labour (Thompson). Within this, female athletes put on the public performance of being feminine girls and women in sports such as rhythmic gymnas-tics and synchronized swimming. So too, women do lots of the invisible work of sport (e.g., driving children to practice, sitting on volunteer boards, fund-raising, creating policy, lobbying for the end of discriminations in sport) and proportionately less of the high profile work in sport (e.g., as members of the IOC or of the International Federations representing sport). These three strands ensure the continuance of male stream sport where women can take on supportive junior-partnership roles. Given the male texture of the sport context, the sport world remains largely unable to accept the athletic potential among its many female participants, choosing instead to question their sex, gender and sexuality. When girls and women do well in sport they cross some invisible threshold where their performances and their sex, gender, and sexuality are scrutinized. The "she throws like a boy" syndrome emerges. And, if she throws like a boy, it is not a huge leap to ask "is she a boy?" If she looks very strong and muscular and acts in an athletic manner, is she not feminine but masculine instead, not female but male?</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Athletic ability</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Gender identity</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Sex (Biology)</subject><subject>Sex chromosome abnormalities</subject><subject>Sex discrimination against women</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Titles</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0713-3235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzT1PwzAQBuAMIFEK_8EwMRDJH0kcs5UKSqUKBsocOfE5uAQ7jR2p_HuMylCkDtwNJ7169N5JMsGcsJRRlp8l595vcByG-SRZrmX3YWyLZO3GgDzs7lBtXOfaLyStQuEdkHeNkR0yNsDQDxBkMM565PQPjzHyvRvCRXKqZefh8vdOk7fHh_X8KV29LJbz2SptichEWigqaU5ymROCmwJjkTGgpagV1sBKkUPTaKGILjIFhANWjAoFVJd1gXMu2TS53vf2g9uO4EO1ceNg48uKEp7xjHER0e0etbKDyljtwiCbFiwMsnMWtInxrCx5QXJeRn51hDe92VYHJj1i4ir4NM2xzps_PpIAu9DK0ftq-fr8b3q_OKDff4OMQQ</recordid><startdate>20021222</startdate><enddate>20021222</enddate><creator>Kirby, Sandra</creator><creator>Huebner, Judith</creator><general>Canadian Woman Studies</general><general>Inanna Publications and Education Inc</general><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021222</creationdate><title>Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport</title><author>Kirby, Sandra ; Huebner, Judith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1949-6d2a2515a5110c600943e289bd0fe3895eccf9d1f64de17e0d329de2f8b6057a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Athletic ability</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Gender identity</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Sex (Biology)</topic><topic>Sex chromosome abnormalities</topic><topic>Sex discrimination against women</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Titles</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Judith</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) – US</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION eBooks)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian woman studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirby, Sandra</au><au>Huebner, Judith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport</atitle><jtitle>Canadian woman studies</jtitle><date>2002-12-22</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>36</spage><pages>36-</pages><issn>0713-3235</issn><abstract>Second, are the chromosomal problems. Accuracy of Barr Body tests depends on the expertise of the technician. In addition, a number of sex chromosomal and genetic conditions can result in Barr Body results at odds with other indicators. A normal male (XY) has a penis present and no Barr Bodies; a Turners female (XO) has no penis and no Barr bodies. On the other hand, a normal female (XX) has no penis and has one Barr Body, while a Klinefelters male (XXY) has a penis and has one Barr Body. Thus on the basis of the Barr Body test, a Turners female would not be verified and would be unable to participate in women's competition while a Klinefelters male would be verified female and would be permitted to compete. Likewise, women with androgen insensitivity (testicular feminization) syndrome appear and act female. In fact, these individuals often display "ideal" female figures. They have always been treated as females, behave like females, and consider themselves female; however their karyotype is XY and they have no Barr Bodies and would be disqualified from competition in women's events on that basis. Sport is a gendered social world that is bifurcated along the gender lines. There is an internal logic to sport, a logic with several strands. One strand is that sport prepares boys to be men. There are masculine sports such as football and ice hockey where boys can be boys becoming men--and single sex competition ensures that "girls don't challenge boys." The second strand is that sport for males has been called sexuality suppressed by militarism (McKay). Sport idealizes things heterosexual and is homophobic to a great degree (Griffen). Some male athletes put on public displays of sexual prowess, establishing competitions for sexual titles. These competitions, including the practice of hazing or initiation, include heterosexual and sometimes hyper-heterosexual behaviours and expressions of attitudes. Female athletes appear to be stereotyped as either "the girl next door" or a lesbian. Despite the fact of women's century long competition is sport, excellent female athletes are still called tomboys, amazons and dykes, the inference being that if females are good athletes then they cannot be real women. The third strand in the internal logic of sport is that it is a site for the reinforcement of the sexual division of labour (Thompson). Within this, female athletes put on the public performance of being feminine girls and women in sports such as rhythmic gymnas-tics and synchronized swimming. So too, women do lots of the invisible work of sport (e.g., driving children to practice, sitting on volunteer boards, fund-raising, creating policy, lobbying for the end of discriminations in sport) and proportionately less of the high profile work in sport (e.g., as members of the IOC or of the International Federations representing sport). These three strands ensure the continuance of male stream sport where women can take on supportive junior-partnership roles. Given the male texture of the sport context, the sport world remains largely unable to accept the athletic potential among its many female participants, choosing instead to question their sex, gender and sexuality. When girls and women do well in sport they cross some invisible threshold where their performances and their sex, gender, and sexuality are scrutinized. The "she throws like a boy" syndrome emerges. And, if she throws like a boy, it is not a huge leap to ask "is she a boy?" If she looks very strong and muscular and acts in an athletic manner, is she not feminine but masculine instead, not female but male?</abstract><cop>Downsview</cop><pub>Canadian Woman Studies</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0713-3235 |
ispartof | Canadian woman studies, 2002-12, Vol.21 (3), p.36 |
issn | 0713-3235 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_217474379 |
source | ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | Athletes Athletic ability Attitudes Biology Children Gender identity Inference Laws, regulations and rules Logic Physiological aspects Reinforcement Sex (Biology) Sex chromosome abnormalities Sex discrimination against women Sexuality Sports Stereotypes Testing Titles Women |
title | Talking about sex: biology and the social interpretations of sex in sport |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Talking%20about%20sex:%20biology%20and%20the%20social%20interpretations%20of%20sex%20in%20sport&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20woman%20studies&rft.au=Kirby,%20Sandra&rft.date=2002-12-22&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-&rft.issn=0713-3235&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA88761578%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1949-6d2a2515a5110c600943e289bd0fe3895eccf9d1f64de17e0d329de2f8b6057a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217474379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A88761578&rfr_iscdi=true |