Loading…
A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy
The model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm promotes the use of conceptual models in information systems (IS) engineering and research. As engineering products, conceptual models must be of high quality, which applies to both conceptual models and the modelling language used to build them. Quality i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Software quality journal 2019-09, Vol.27 (3), p.1239-1269 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223 |
container_end_page | 1269 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1239 |
container_title | Software quality journal |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Giraldo, Fáber D. España, Sergio Giraldo, William J. Pastor, Óscar Krogstie, John |
description | The model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm promotes the use of conceptual models in information systems (IS) engineering and research. As engineering products, conceptual models must be of high quality, which applies to both conceptual models and the modelling language used to build them.
Quality
is a growing concern in the MDE field; however, studies such as Giraldo, F.D. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–66 (
2016b
) and Goulão, M. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–33 (
2016
) demonstrate the divergence in several approaches that are proposed for addressing this topic. Due to the many challenges, divergences, and trends for quality assessment and assurance in the MDE context, one way to perform a quality evaluation process is to use an approach where the applicability and goals of modelling languages (and artifacts) can be compared with respect to the essential principles of the development of IS. We propose using principles from an IS architecture reference (i.e., the
Zachman
framework) as a
taxonomy
that is applied on the modelling languages used in information system development in order to perform analytic procedures. We also demonstrate that this taxonomy can be considered as a
formal context
for the application of the
formal concept analysis
(FCA) method. This paper derives formal, methodological, and technological requirements for a modelling language quality evaluation method (MMQEF) with the potential to tackle some of the open MDE quality challenges. In addition, a tool that operationalizes the taxonomic evaluation procedure and the FCA analytic method is also presented. In this work, we discuss how this taxonomy supports analytics that are in modelling languages for quality purposes through its management of the semantics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11219-018-9434-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2174915466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2174915466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9Gk-WqOy-IXCF70ooeQttPuLm2zm6Ti_ntbKnjyNAy8zzvDg9A1o7eMUn0XGcuYIZTlxAguiDpBCyY1J4wrfYoW1ChODGfiHF3EuKN0osQCfa5wB2njK5w8hi_XDi4BPgyu3aYj9jXufAVtu-0b3Lq-GVwDERcuQoV9j9MG8IcrN53rcYAaAvQl4OS-fe-74yU6q10b4ep3LtH7w_3b-om8vD4-r1cvpORMJeKEployaWoqRWHqgiptRDZueWWKqtCOKZ7XuakKIaqsVFIKMLmkAgqTZxlfopu5dx_8YYCY7M4PoR9P2oxpYZgUSo0pNqfK4GMcv7X7sO1cOFpG7WTDzg7t6NBODu3EZDMTx2zfQPhr_h_6AQ1cc5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2174915466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Giraldo, Fáber D. ; España, Sergio ; Giraldo, William J. ; Pastor, Óscar ; Krogstie, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Fáber D. ; España, Sergio ; Giraldo, William J. ; Pastor, Óscar ; Krogstie, John</creatorcontrib><description>The model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm promotes the use of conceptual models in information systems (IS) engineering and research. As engineering products, conceptual models must be of high quality, which applies to both conceptual models and the modelling language used to build them.
Quality
is a growing concern in the MDE field; however, studies such as Giraldo, F.D. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–66 (
2016b
) and Goulão, M. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–33 (
2016
) demonstrate the divergence in several approaches that are proposed for addressing this topic. Due to the many challenges, divergences, and trends for quality assessment and assurance in the MDE context, one way to perform a quality evaluation process is to use an approach where the applicability and goals of modelling languages (and artifacts) can be compared with respect to the essential principles of the development of IS. We propose using principles from an IS architecture reference (i.e., the
Zachman
framework) as a
taxonomy
that is applied on the modelling languages used in information system development in order to perform analytic procedures. We also demonstrate that this taxonomy can be considered as a
formal context
for the application of the
formal concept analysis
(FCA) method. This paper derives formal, methodological, and technological requirements for a modelling language quality evaluation method (MMQEF) with the potential to tackle some of the open MDE quality challenges. In addition, a tool that operationalizes the taxonomic evaluation procedure and the FCA analytic method is also presented. In this work, we discuss how this taxonomy supports analytics that are in modelling languages for quality purposes through its management of the semantics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11219-018-9434-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Compilers ; Computer Science ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Divergence ; Information systems ; Interpreters ; Languages ; Mathematical analysis ; Modelling ; Operating Systems ; Programming Languages ; Quality assessment ; Quality assurance ; Semantics ; Software ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; Software quality ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Software quality journal, 2019-09, Vol.27 (3), p.1239-1269</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Software Quality Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6111-3055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2174915466/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2174915466?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Fáber D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>España, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogstie, John</creatorcontrib><title>A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy</title><title>Software quality journal</title><addtitle>Software Qual J</addtitle><description>The model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm promotes the use of conceptual models in information systems (IS) engineering and research. As engineering products, conceptual models must be of high quality, which applies to both conceptual models and the modelling language used to build them.
Quality
is a growing concern in the MDE field; however, studies such as Giraldo, F.D. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–66 (
2016b
) and Goulão, M. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–33 (
2016
) demonstrate the divergence in several approaches that are proposed for addressing this topic. Due to the many challenges, divergences, and trends for quality assessment and assurance in the MDE context, one way to perform a quality evaluation process is to use an approach where the applicability and goals of modelling languages (and artifacts) can be compared with respect to the essential principles of the development of IS. We propose using principles from an IS architecture reference (i.e., the
Zachman
framework) as a
taxonomy
that is applied on the modelling languages used in information system development in order to perform analytic procedures. We also demonstrate that this taxonomy can be considered as a
formal context
for the application of the
formal concept analysis
(FCA) method. This paper derives formal, methodological, and technological requirements for a modelling language quality evaluation method (MMQEF) with the potential to tackle some of the open MDE quality challenges. In addition, a tool that operationalizes the taxonomic evaluation procedure and the FCA analytic method is also presented. In this work, we discuss how this taxonomy supports analytics that are in modelling languages for quality purposes through its management of the semantics.</description><subject>Compilers</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Interpreters</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Operating Systems</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>Software quality</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0963-9314</issn><issn>1573-1367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9Gk-WqOy-IXCF70ooeQttPuLm2zm6Ti_ntbKnjyNAy8zzvDg9A1o7eMUn0XGcuYIZTlxAguiDpBCyY1J4wrfYoW1ChODGfiHF3EuKN0osQCfa5wB2njK5w8hi_XDi4BPgyu3aYj9jXufAVtu-0b3Lq-GVwDERcuQoV9j9MG8IcrN53rcYAaAvQl4OS-fe-74yU6q10b4ep3LtH7w_3b-om8vD4-r1cvpORMJeKEployaWoqRWHqgiptRDZueWWKqtCOKZ7XuakKIaqsVFIKMLmkAgqTZxlfopu5dx_8YYCY7M4PoR9P2oxpYZgUSo0pNqfK4GMcv7X7sO1cOFpG7WTDzg7t6NBODu3EZDMTx2zfQPhr_h_6AQ1cc5k</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Giraldo, Fáber D.</creator><creator>España, Sergio</creator><creator>Giraldo, William J.</creator><creator>Pastor, Óscar</creator><creator>Krogstie, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-3055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy</title><author>Giraldo, Fáber D. ; España, Sergio ; Giraldo, William J. ; Pastor, Óscar ; Krogstie, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Compilers</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Interpreters</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Operating Systems</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>Software quality</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Fáber D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>España, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogstie, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giraldo, Fáber D.</au><au>España, Sergio</au><au>Giraldo, William J.</au><au>Pastor, Óscar</au><au>Krogstie, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy</atitle><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle><stitle>Software Qual J</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1239</spage><epage>1269</epage><pages>1239-1269</pages><issn>0963-9314</issn><eissn>1573-1367</eissn><abstract>The model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm promotes the use of conceptual models in information systems (IS) engineering and research. As engineering products, conceptual models must be of high quality, which applies to both conceptual models and the modelling language used to build them.
Quality
is a growing concern in the MDE field; however, studies such as Giraldo, F.D. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–66 (
2016b
) and Goulão, M. et al. Software Quality Journal, pp. 1–33 (
2016
) demonstrate the divergence in several approaches that are proposed for addressing this topic. Due to the many challenges, divergences, and trends for quality assessment and assurance in the MDE context, one way to perform a quality evaluation process is to use an approach where the applicability and goals of modelling languages (and artifacts) can be compared with respect to the essential principles of the development of IS. We propose using principles from an IS architecture reference (i.e., the
Zachman
framework) as a
taxonomy
that is applied on the modelling languages used in information system development in order to perform analytic procedures. We also demonstrate that this taxonomy can be considered as a
formal context
for the application of the
formal concept analysis
(FCA) method. This paper derives formal, methodological, and technological requirements for a modelling language quality evaluation method (MMQEF) with the potential to tackle some of the open MDE quality challenges. In addition, a tool that operationalizes the taxonomic evaluation procedure and the FCA analytic method is also presented. In this work, we discuss how this taxonomy supports analytics that are in modelling languages for quality purposes through its management of the semantics.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11219-018-9434-6</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-3055</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9314 |
ispartof | Software quality journal, 2019-09, Vol.27 (3), p.1239-1269 |
issn | 0963-9314 1573-1367 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2174915466 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Springer Link |
subjects | Compilers Computer Science Data Structures and Information Theory Divergence Information systems Interpreters Languages Mathematical analysis Modelling Operating Systems Programming Languages Quality assessment Quality assurance Semantics Software Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Software quality Taxonomy |
title | A method to evaluate quality of modelling languages based on the Zachman reference taxonomy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20to%20evaluate%20quality%20of%20modelling%20languages%20based%20on%20the%20Zachman%20reference%20taxonomy&rft.jtitle=Software%20quality%20journal&rft.au=Giraldo,%20F%C3%A1ber%20D.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1239&rft.epage=1269&rft.pages=1239-1269&rft.issn=0963-9314&rft.eissn=1573-1367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11219-018-9434-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2174915466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a47075159f054b9fb067942f058d9bdb7a1638f89db44d2c6554e98504eb98223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2174915466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |