Loading…

The programme for the evaluation of patient care with acupuncture (PEP-Ac) – a project sponsored by ten German social health insurance funds

Objective The aim of the Programme for the Evaluation of Patient care with Acupuncture (PEP-Ac) was to investigate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in patients with the following three indications: chronic headache, chronic low back pain and chronic osteoarthritic pain. This art...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society 2006-12, Vol.24 (Suppl), p.25-32
Main Authors: Linde, Klaus, Streng, Andrea, Hoppe, Andrea, Jürgens, Susanne, Weidenhammer, Wolfgang, Melchart, Dieter
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The aim of the Programme for the Evaluation of Patient care with Acupuncture (PEP-Ac) was to investigate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in patients with the following three indications: chronic headache, chronic low back pain and chronic osteoarthritic pain. This article provides an overview of the results of the whole programme. Methods The programme included five randomised trials, a large observational study, a survey of physicians providing acupuncture, and three systematic reviews. Results The results show that, for all three indications, acupuncture, when compared to no treatment, produces a clear benefit that lasts for at least several months. However the effects of point-specific acupuncture only offered a significant advantage over minimal acupuncture in the treatment of OA knee. Conclusions The evidence from these trials – on the one hand, a clear overall effect of acupuncture and on the other hand, the lack of evidence supporting its superiority over sham acupuncture for all indications except osteoarthritis of the knee – leaves a considerable amount of room for interpretation.
ISSN:0964-5284
1759-9873
DOI:10.1136/aim.24.Suppl.25