Loading…
To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?
The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in...
Saved in:
Published in: | TESOL quarterly 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3 |
container_end_page | 107 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | TESOL quarterly |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | SAITO, KAZUYA |
description | The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tesq.468 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2176556271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1204985</ericid><jstor_id>45214910</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45214910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1OGzEUBWCrolIDReoLVLKEkLoZ6t_YXiEEEwIaiVYJ6tIynjvppImd2JNC3p5BU0E3rLy4n869Pgh9oeSMEsK-d5C3Z2KsP6ARlUIWiglzgEaEcFNoztgndJjzkhCitBYjtJ1H_Ou363D51EHo8FWEjKsYFsUc0hpPYoJ2EXDlwmLnFoDLeudd18aAp7Da4Jv1JsW_gGeb-AcCnoGPoX7TFTy13q3wjxSb1rcQ_P78M_rYuFWG43_vEbqflPPLaVHdXd9cXlSFF0LqQkhZq4YJzhtdK9cY4ZUnvOYCHK-1ZFR7aph0wgihHrz3D0Y2khintWtqz4_QyZDbX7jdQe7sMu5S6FdaRtVYyjFTtFffBuVTzDlBYzepXbu0t5TYl0LtS6G2L7SnXwcKqfWvrLyljAijZT8vhvlju4L9uzl2Xs5-Dnmng1_mLqb_PeNEWdF_URhK-DOr84yo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176556271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>SAITO, KAZUYA</creator><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-8322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tesq.468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; College students ; Contrastive Linguistics ; Correlation ; Educational research ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English proficiency ; Foreign language learning ; Imageability ; Individual Differences ; Japanese ; Japanese language ; Language Proficiency ; Learning outcomes ; Linguistic Input ; Morphology (Languages) ; Native Language ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Semantics ; Speech Communication ; Spontaneous speech ; Syntax ; Undergraduate Students ; Vocabulary development ; Vocabulary Skills ; Word Frequency</subject><ispartof>TESOL quarterly, 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 TESOL International Association</rights><rights>2018 TESOL International Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45214910$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45214910$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1204985$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><title>TESOL quarterly</title><description>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Contrastive Linguistics</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Imageability</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Japanese</subject><subject>Japanese language</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Morphology (Languages)</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Spontaneous speech</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><issn>0039-8322</issn><issn>1545-7249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1OGzEUBWCrolIDReoLVLKEkLoZ6t_YXiEEEwIaiVYJ6tIynjvppImd2JNC3p5BU0E3rLy4n869Pgh9oeSMEsK-d5C3Z2KsP6ARlUIWiglzgEaEcFNoztgndJjzkhCitBYjtJ1H_Ou363D51EHo8FWEjKsYFsUc0hpPYoJ2EXDlwmLnFoDLeudd18aAp7Da4Jv1JsW_gGeb-AcCnoGPoX7TFTy13q3wjxSb1rcQ_P78M_rYuFWG43_vEbqflPPLaVHdXd9cXlSFF0LqQkhZq4YJzhtdK9cY4ZUnvOYCHK-1ZFR7aph0wgihHrz3D0Y2khintWtqz4_QyZDbX7jdQe7sMu5S6FdaRtVYyjFTtFffBuVTzDlBYzepXbu0t5TYl0LtS6G2L7SnXwcKqfWvrLyljAijZT8vhvlju4L9uzl2Xs5-Dnmng1_mLqb_PeNEWdF_URhK-DOr84yo</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>SAITO, KAZUYA</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><author>SAITO, KAZUYA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Contrastive Linguistics</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Imageability</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Japanese</topic><topic>Japanese language</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Morphology (Languages)</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Spontaneous speech</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>TESOL quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAITO, KAZUYA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1204985</ericid><atitle>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</atitle><jtitle>TESOL quarterly</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>82-107</pages><issn>0039-8322</issn><eissn>1545-7249</eissn><abstract>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tesq.468</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-8322 |
ispartof | TESOL quarterly, 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107 |
issn | 0039-8322 1545-7249 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2176556271 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Accuracy College students Contrastive Linguistics Correlation Educational research English (Second Language) English as a second language English proficiency Foreign language learning Imageability Individual Differences Japanese Japanese language Language Proficiency Learning outcomes Linguistic Input Morphology (Languages) Native Language Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Semantics Speech Communication Spontaneous speech Syntax Undergraduate Students Vocabulary development Vocabulary Skills Word Frequency |
title | To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20What%20Extent%20Does%20Long-Term%20Foreign%20Language%20Education%20Help%20Improve%20Spoken%20Second%20Language%20Lexical%20Proficiency?&rft.jtitle=TESOL%20quarterly&rft.au=SAITO,%20KAZUYA&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=82-107&rft.issn=0039-8322&rft.eissn=1545-7249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tesq.468&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45214910%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176556271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1204985&rft_jstor_id=45214910&rfr_iscdi=true |