Loading…

To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?

The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:TESOL quarterly 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107
Main Author: SAITO, KAZUYA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title TESOL quarterly
container_volume 53
creator SAITO, KAZUYA
description The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tesq.468
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2176556271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1204985</ericid><jstor_id>45214910</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45214910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1OGzEUBWCrolIDReoLVLKEkLoZ6t_YXiEEEwIaiVYJ6tIynjvppImd2JNC3p5BU0E3rLy4n869Pgh9oeSMEsK-d5C3Z2KsP6ARlUIWiglzgEaEcFNoztgndJjzkhCitBYjtJ1H_Ou363D51EHo8FWEjKsYFsUc0hpPYoJ2EXDlwmLnFoDLeudd18aAp7Da4Jv1JsW_gGeb-AcCnoGPoX7TFTy13q3wjxSb1rcQ_P78M_rYuFWG43_vEbqflPPLaVHdXd9cXlSFF0LqQkhZq4YJzhtdK9cY4ZUnvOYCHK-1ZFR7aph0wgihHrz3D0Y2khintWtqz4_QyZDbX7jdQe7sMu5S6FdaRtVYyjFTtFffBuVTzDlBYzepXbu0t5TYl0LtS6G2L7SnXwcKqfWvrLyljAijZT8vhvlju4L9uzl2Xs5-Dnmng1_mLqb_PeNEWdF_URhK-DOr84yo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176556271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>SAITO, KAZUYA</creator><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-8322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tesq.468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; College students ; Contrastive Linguistics ; Correlation ; Educational research ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English proficiency ; Foreign language learning ; Imageability ; Individual Differences ; Japanese ; Japanese language ; Language Proficiency ; Learning outcomes ; Linguistic Input ; Morphology (Languages) ; Native Language ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Semantics ; Speech Communication ; Spontaneous speech ; Syntax ; Undergraduate Students ; Vocabulary development ; Vocabulary Skills ; Word Frequency</subject><ispartof>TESOL quarterly, 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 TESOL International Association</rights><rights>2018 TESOL International Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45214910$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45214910$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1204985$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><title>TESOL quarterly</title><description>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Contrastive Linguistics</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Imageability</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Japanese</subject><subject>Japanese language</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Morphology (Languages)</subject><subject>Native Language</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Spontaneous speech</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><issn>0039-8322</issn><issn>1545-7249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1OGzEUBWCrolIDReoLVLKEkLoZ6t_YXiEEEwIaiVYJ6tIynjvppImd2JNC3p5BU0E3rLy4n869Pgh9oeSMEsK-d5C3Z2KsP6ARlUIWiglzgEaEcFNoztgndJjzkhCitBYjtJ1H_Ou363D51EHo8FWEjKsYFsUc0hpPYoJ2EXDlwmLnFoDLeudd18aAp7Da4Jv1JsW_gGeb-AcCnoGPoX7TFTy13q3wjxSb1rcQ_P78M_rYuFWG43_vEbqflPPLaVHdXd9cXlSFF0LqQkhZq4YJzhtdK9cY4ZUnvOYCHK-1ZFR7aph0wgihHrz3D0Y2khintWtqz4_QyZDbX7jdQe7sMu5S6FdaRtVYyjFTtFffBuVTzDlBYzepXbu0t5TYl0LtS6G2L7SnXwcKqfWvrLyljAijZT8vhvlju4L9uzl2Xs5-Dnmng1_mLqb_PeNEWdF_URhK-DOr84yo</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>SAITO, KAZUYA</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</title><author>SAITO, KAZUYA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Contrastive Linguistics</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Imageability</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Japanese</topic><topic>Japanese language</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Morphology (Languages)</topic><topic>Native Language</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Spontaneous speech</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAITO, KAZUYA</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>TESOL quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAITO, KAZUYA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1204985</ericid><atitle>To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?</atitle><jtitle>TESOL quarterly</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>82-107</pages><issn>0039-8322</issn><eissn>1545-7249</eissn><abstract>The current study examined lexical aspects of second language (L2) speech attainment in the foreign language (FL) classroom setting (i.e., several hours of target language input per week). A total of 72 second-year university students with 7 years of FL study and no experience abroad participated in the study. Their spontaneous speech was analyzed via a set of lexical measures and then compared to that of experienced, naturalistic Japanese L2 learners of English. According to the results, their lexical proficiency was factored into three dimensions—appropriateness (global, semantic, morphosyntactic accuracy), specificity (frequency, range), and abstractness (concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, hypernymy). Overall, extensive FL education led many participants' specificity performance to reach proficiency levels comparable to the baseline group. Approximately half of participants achieved such satisfactory proficiency in abstractness. The participants' lexical appropriateness demonstrated a great deal of individual variability and was linked to the extent to which they had recendy practiced the target language.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tesq.468</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-8322
ispartof TESOL quarterly, 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.82-107
issn 0039-8322
1545-7249
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2176556271
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Accuracy
College students
Contrastive Linguistics
Correlation
Educational research
English (Second Language)
English as a second language
English proficiency
Foreign language learning
Imageability
Individual Differences
Japanese
Japanese language
Language Proficiency
Learning outcomes
Linguistic Input
Morphology (Languages)
Native Language
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Semantics
Speech Communication
Spontaneous speech
Syntax
Undergraduate Students
Vocabulary development
Vocabulary Skills
Word Frequency
title To What Extent Does Long-Term Foreign Language Education Help Improve Spoken Second Language Lexical Proficiency?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20What%20Extent%20Does%20Long-Term%20Foreign%20Language%20Education%20Help%20Improve%20Spoken%20Second%20Language%20Lexical%20Proficiency?&rft.jtitle=TESOL%20quarterly&rft.au=SAITO,%20KAZUYA&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=82-107&rft.issn=0039-8322&rft.eissn=1545-7249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tesq.468&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45214910%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4458-455d7f2433f8d7af94c7c03d34ea3d85218c1925a49447bcccb95f509a88afdc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176556271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1204985&rft_jstor_id=45214910&rfr_iscdi=true