Loading…

Comparison of cefoxitin and moxalactam 30 µg disc diffusion methods for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci

Objectives To compare cefoxitin and/or moxalactam 30 µg disc diffusion (DD) methods to detect methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) using both high- and low-density (HD/LD) inoculum techniques. Methods A challenge set of 192 CoNS was tested. DD test results were compared...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2007-04, Vol.59 (4), p.763-766
Main Authors: Join-Lambert, Olivier F., Clauser, Sylvain, Guillet, Christelle, Jais, Jean-Philippe, Abachin, Eric, Quesnes, Gilles, Carbonnelle, Etienne, Le Monnier, Alban, Zahar, Jean-Ralph, Kayal, Samer, Berche, Patrick, Ferroni, Agnès
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To compare cefoxitin and/or moxalactam 30 µg disc diffusion (DD) methods to detect methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) using both high- and low-density (HD/LD) inoculum techniques. Methods A challenge set of 192 CoNS was tested. DD test results were compared with PBP2a detection. Results With the LD inoculum, the sensitivity/specificity of cefoxitin and moxalactam were 94.4%/100% and 100%/92.4%, respectively, using the DD breakpoints of the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. With the HD inoculum, the sensitivity/specificity of cefoxitin and moxalactam were 93.7%/100% and 100%/96.9%, using the cefoxitin DD breakpoints of the CLSI and a resistant/susceptible breakpoint of < 20 mm/≥20 mm for moxalactam. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic AUCs did not show significant difference between studied assays, but the overlapping zone where both PBP2a-positive and PBP2a-negative isolates were observed concerned a lower number of strains with moxalactam than with cefoxitin (P < 0.001). Combination of cefoxitin and moxalactam DD methods demonstrated that all isolates with a concordant cefoxitin/moxalactam phenotype were correctly classified. Interestingly, all isolates misclassified by each DD method used alone were cefoxitin-susceptible and moxalactam-resistant. Conclusions Although all DD methods studied here performed well for detecting methicillin resistance in CoNS, moxalactam had a higher accuracy than cefoxitin to differentiate heteroresistant isolates from PBP2a-negative strains. Identification of isolates that should be submitted to a confirmatory test to conclude on methicillin resistance can be easily obtained by combining cefoxitin and moxalactam DD methods.
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkl548