The Fates of Third-Wave Democracies

This article offers the first comprehensive analysis of the outcomes of third-wave democratic transitions. It charts where democracy broke down, stagnated, advanced, and eroded, and it investigates the initial starting conditions associated with democratic deepening and breakdown. The findings are s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of democracy 2019, Vol.30 (1), p.99-113
Main Authors: Mainwaring, Scott, Bizzarro, Fernando
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Autocracy
Democracy
Democratization
Economic growth
GDP
Graphs
Gross Domestic Product
Liberal democracy
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article offers the first comprehensive analysis of the outcomes of third-wave democratic transitions. It charts where democracy broke down, stagnated, advanced, and eroded, and it investigates the initial starting conditions associated with democratic deepening and breakdown. The findings are sobering: Among the 91 new democracies that (by our count) emerged from 1974 to 2012, 34 experienced breakdowns, often in short order. In 28 cases, democracy stagnated after transition, usually at a fairly low level, and in two more it eroded. Democracy advanced relative to the starting point in only 23 cases. Few countries have succeeded in creating robust liberal democracies. Regimes that started off with a higher level of liberal democracy, that were geographically surrounded by democracies, and that experienced better rates of economic growth were less likely to break down. Regimes that started off with a lower per capita GDP and those that experienced lower economic growth, as well as regimes that started off with a higher level of liberal democracy, were less likely to deepen democracy.
ISSN:1045-5736
1086-3214
1086-3214
DOI:10.1353/jod.2019.0008