To Excuse or Not to Excuse: Effect of Explanation Type and Provision on Reactions to a Workplace Behavioral Transgression

People often offer an excuse or an apology after they do something wrong. In this paper, we examine how giving an excuse, an apology, or no explanation after arriving late to a meeting influences the attitudes and behavioral intentions others form toward the late arrival. Additionally, we examined h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business and psychology 2020-04, Vol.35 (2), p.187-201
Main Authors: Mroz, Joseph E., Allen, Joseph A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Apologies
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Business and Management
Community and Environmental Psychology
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Meetings
ORIGINAL PAPER
Personality and Social Psychology
Psychology
Social Sciences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:People often offer an excuse or an apology after they do something wrong. In this paper, we examine how giving an excuse, an apology, or no explanation after arriving late to a meeting influences the attitudes and behavioral intentions others form toward the late arrival. Additionally, we examined how a group-related factor (complaining) and the late arrival’s history with coming late affected participant judgments. Across two studies using complementary experimental and survey methods, we found that an excuse is better than no explanation, but that the difference between apology and no explanation and apology and excuse is not always clear. Furthermore, we found that common distinctions between explanation types used in the literature may not fully exist in non-laboratory social interactions. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.
ISSN:0889-3268
1573-353X
DOI:10.1007/s10869-019-09622-1