Loading…

Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques

Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805
Main Authors: Sharifi, E., Saghafian, B., Steinacker, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973
container_end_page 805
container_issue 2
container_start_page 789
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 124
creator Sharifi, E.
Saghafian, B.
Steinacker, R.
description Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data. Key Points The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018JD028795
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2181004401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2181004401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhSdGEwmy8wGauAVtO3_tkgAiBH8CGN1N2s4dKNaZsS0hvITP7CDGuPJuzk3Ol3OSEwSXBF8TTPkNxYRNh5iylMcnQYuShPcY58np75--ngcd5za4OYbDKI5aweew2pVOCaPLFVoID8ZoD-jJgtK19sLrqkQj5_V74zn0ov0a3W-N17UBNNMlCIvmsLLgXEN2Ud96XWilhUEPsLXf4neVfXNdJMocLeqmCdCk9GDryhzzl6DWpf7YgrsIzgphHHR-tB08346Wg7ve7HE8GfRnPRUylvaKpJBUgcqZUiIlseR5mEBBSH7wRVzIhAEHkBBHaRJJhiNCJQEqZS45T8N2cHXMrW116PXZptrasqnMKGEE4yjCpKG6R0rZyjkLRVbbZgi7zwjODqNnf0dv8PCI77SB_b9sNh3Ph3FMcRp-AVkMhsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2181004401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data. Key Points The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Basins ; Cloud water ; Clouds ; Data ; downscaling ; Gauges ; Geophysics ; Hydrologic data ; IMERG‐GPM ; Interpolation ; Interpolation techniques ; MODIS ; multilinear regression ; Neural networks ; Optical properties ; Optical thickness ; Precipitation ; Precipitation data ; Precipitation estimation ; Rain gauges ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Satellite precipitation estimates ; Satellites ; Spatial resolution</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data. Key Points The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Cloud water</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>downscaling</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>IMERG‐GPM</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Interpolation techniques</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>multilinear regression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Optical thickness</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation data</subject><subject>Precipitation estimation</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Satellite precipitation estimates</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhSdGEwmy8wGauAVtO3_tkgAiBH8CGN1N2s4dKNaZsS0hvITP7CDGuPJuzk3Ol3OSEwSXBF8TTPkNxYRNh5iylMcnQYuShPcY58np75--ngcd5za4OYbDKI5aweew2pVOCaPLFVoID8ZoD-jJgtK19sLrqkQj5_V74zn0ov0a3W-N17UBNNMlCIvmsLLgXEN2Ud96XWilhUEPsLXf4neVfXNdJMocLeqmCdCk9GDryhzzl6DWpf7YgrsIzgphHHR-tB08346Wg7ve7HE8GfRnPRUylvaKpJBUgcqZUiIlseR5mEBBSH7wRVzIhAEHkBBHaRJJhiNCJQEqZS45T8N2cHXMrW116PXZptrasqnMKGEE4yjCpKG6R0rZyjkLRVbbZgi7zwjODqNnf0dv8PCI77SB_b9sNh3Ph3FMcRp-AVkMhsM</recordid><startdate>20190127</startdate><enddate>20190127</enddate><creator>Sharifi, E.</creator><creator>Saghafian, B.</creator><creator>Steinacker, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190127</creationdate><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><author>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Cloud water</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>downscaling</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>IMERG‐GPM</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Interpolation techniques</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>multilinear regression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Optical thickness</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation data</topic><topic>Precipitation estimation</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Satellite precipitation estimates</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharifi, E.</au><au>Saghafian, B.</au><au>Steinacker, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2019-01-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>789</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>789-805</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data. Key Points The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JD028795</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2181004401
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Atmospheric precipitations
Basins
Cloud water
Clouds
Data
downscaling
Gauges
Geophysics
Hydrologic data
IMERG‐GPM
Interpolation
Interpolation techniques
MODIS
multilinear regression
Neural networks
Optical properties
Optical thickness
Precipitation
Precipitation data
Precipitation estimation
Rain gauges
Regression
Regression analysis
Satellite precipitation estimates
Satellites
Spatial resolution
title Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T04%3A13%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Downscaling%20Satellite%20Precipitation%20Estimates%20With%20Multiple%20Linear%20Regression,%20Artificial%20Neural%20Networks,%20and%20Spline%20Interpolation%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Sharifi,%20E.&rft.date=2019-01-27&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=789&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=789-805&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JD028795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2181004401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2181004401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true