Loading…
Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques
Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973 |
container_end_page | 805 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 789 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Sharifi, E. Saghafian, B. Steinacker, R. |
description | Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data.
Key Points
The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product
Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation
Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JD028795 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2181004401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2181004401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhSdGEwmy8wGauAVtO3_tkgAiBH8CGN1N2s4dKNaZsS0hvITP7CDGuPJuzk3Ol3OSEwSXBF8TTPkNxYRNh5iylMcnQYuShPcY58np75--ngcd5za4OYbDKI5aweew2pVOCaPLFVoID8ZoD-jJgtK19sLrqkQj5_V74zn0ov0a3W-N17UBNNMlCIvmsLLgXEN2Ud96XWilhUEPsLXf4neVfXNdJMocLeqmCdCk9GDryhzzl6DWpf7YgrsIzgphHHR-tB08346Wg7ve7HE8GfRnPRUylvaKpJBUgcqZUiIlseR5mEBBSH7wRVzIhAEHkBBHaRJJhiNCJQEqZS45T8N2cHXMrW116PXZptrasqnMKGEE4yjCpKG6R0rZyjkLRVbbZgi7zwjODqNnf0dv8PCI77SB_b9sNh3Ph3FMcRp-AVkMhsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2181004401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data.
Key Points
The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product
Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation
Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Basins ; Cloud water ; Clouds ; Data ; downscaling ; Gauges ; Geophysics ; Hydrologic data ; IMERG‐GPM ; Interpolation ; Interpolation techniques ; MODIS ; multilinear regression ; Neural networks ; Optical properties ; Optical thickness ; Precipitation ; Precipitation data ; Precipitation estimation ; Rain gauges ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Satellite precipitation estimates ; Satellites ; Spatial resolution</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data.
Key Points
The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product
Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation
Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Cloud water</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>downscaling</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>IMERG‐GPM</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Interpolation techniques</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>multilinear regression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Optical thickness</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation data</subject><subject>Precipitation estimation</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Satellite precipitation estimates</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhSdGEwmy8wGauAVtO3_tkgAiBH8CGN1N2s4dKNaZsS0hvITP7CDGuPJuzk3Ol3OSEwSXBF8TTPkNxYRNh5iylMcnQYuShPcY58np75--ngcd5za4OYbDKI5aweew2pVOCaPLFVoID8ZoD-jJgtK19sLrqkQj5_V74zn0ov0a3W-N17UBNNMlCIvmsLLgXEN2Ud96XWilhUEPsLXf4neVfXNdJMocLeqmCdCk9GDryhzzl6DWpf7YgrsIzgphHHR-tB08346Wg7ve7HE8GfRnPRUylvaKpJBUgcqZUiIlseR5mEBBSH7wRVzIhAEHkBBHaRJJhiNCJQEqZS45T8N2cHXMrW116PXZptrasqnMKGEE4yjCpKG6R0rZyjkLRVbbZgi7zwjODqNnf0dv8PCI77SB_b9sNh3Ph3FMcRp-AVkMhsM</recordid><startdate>20190127</startdate><enddate>20190127</enddate><creator>Sharifi, E.</creator><creator>Saghafian, B.</creator><creator>Steinacker, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190127</creationdate><title>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</title><author>Sharifi, E. ; Saghafian, B. ; Steinacker, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Cloud water</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>downscaling</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>IMERG‐GPM</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Interpolation techniques</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>multilinear regression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Optical thickness</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation data</topic><topic>Precipitation estimation</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Satellite precipitation estimates</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafian, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacker, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharifi, E.</au><au>Saghafian, B.</au><au>Steinacker, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2019-01-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>789</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>789-805</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Satellite precipitation estimates (SPEs) have been widely used in various applications. However, when applied to small basins and regions, the spatial resolution of SPEs is too coarse. In this study, we present three downscaling algorithms based upon the relationships between SPEs and cloud optical and microphysical properties in northeast Austria. Different downscaling techniques, namely, multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation, were adopted for the downscaling of Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) precipitation data. In this respect, linear and nonlinear relationship among IMERG data and different cloud variables, such as cloud effective radius, cloud optical thickness, and cloud water path, was evaluated. Downscaled SPEs, as well as the original IMERG product, were subsequently validated using 54 rain gauges at a daily timescale. According to the results, all downscaled products were more accurate than the original IMERG data. Furthermore, all downscaling techniques captured the spatial patterns of precipitation reasonably well with more detailed information when compared with the original IMERG precipitation. However, the spline interpolation slightly outperformed the other techniques, followed by multiple linear regression and artificial neural network, respectively. Moreover, the proposed methods, which consistently showed increased correlation (e.g., from 0.30 to 0.56 for spline interpolation) and reduced mean absolute error and root‐mean‐square error (e.g., from 10.14 to 6.55 mm and 13.5 to 8.76 mm, respectively) for average of all events, can more accurately produce downscaled precipitation data.
Key Points
The artificial neural networks, multiple linear regression, and spline interpolation downscaling techniques improved the accuracy compared with the original coarse resolution IMERG product
Residual correction algorithms significantly improved the accuracy of final downscaled satellite precipitation
Incorporation of MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products for daily precipitation downscaling purposes proved effective</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JD028795</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-8406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.789-805 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2181004401 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial neural networks Atmospheric precipitations Basins Cloud water Clouds Data downscaling Gauges Geophysics Hydrologic data IMERG‐GPM Interpolation Interpolation techniques MODIS multilinear regression Neural networks Optical properties Optical thickness Precipitation Precipitation data Precipitation estimation Rain gauges Regression Regression analysis Satellite precipitation estimates Satellites Spatial resolution |
title | Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Estimates With Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Spline Interpolation Techniques |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T04%3A13%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Downscaling%20Satellite%20Precipitation%20Estimates%20With%20Multiple%20Linear%20Regression,%20Artificial%20Neural%20Networks,%20and%20Spline%20Interpolation%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Sharifi,%20E.&rft.date=2019-01-27&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=789&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=789-805&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JD028795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2181004401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-f6fb2cecd8cca715b9d36ef11dc388a5fb68e9eebe54764b80412b1e2bbdb9973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2181004401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |