Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector

The public sector has multiple, conflicting, and often intangible goals. It produces "public goods" for problems that should be solved (like crime and poverty), even though these problems may have no known feasible solutions; and it is heavily impacted by politics and bureaucratic red tape...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MIS quarterly 1991-06, Vol.15 (2), p.171-188
Main Authors: Caudle, Sharon L., Gorr, Wilpen L., Newcomer, Kathryn E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Application
Attitude surveys
Comparative analysis
Computer technology
Government
Government agencies
Information management
Information resources
Information systems
Information technology
Mainframe computers
Management information systems
Private sector
Public sector
Studies
Systems management
Technology transfer
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The public sector has multiple, conflicting, and often intangible goals. It produces "public goods" for problems that should be solved (like crime and poverty), even though these problems may have no known feasible solutions; and it is heavily impacted by politics and bureaucratic red tape. These and other features of the public sector make it potentially a much different setting for IS management than the private sector. This article reports on the first national survey of public sector managers identifying their most important IS issues. The survey, covering respondents from federal, state, and local governments, drew upon prior survey research in the private sector and the literature on public/private sector differences. While most of the top public sector issues also appear on the top private sector issue lists, the rankings show a lag in public IS development as compared to the private sector. Perhaps the most interesting results of the survey, however, are from a deeper analysis. At the main effects-level, we have preliminary evidence that (1) middle-level (instead of top-level) public managers are critical for IS technology development; (2) small government agencies are more interested in IS technology transfer than large ones; (3) governments with a lot of red tape tend to have flexible IS; and (4) local government IS issues are driven by transaction processing while state and federal governments have IS more suitable for their oversight mission.
ISSN:0276-7783
2162-9730
DOI:10.2307/249378