Loading…

Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies

IT governance arrangements refers to the patterns of authority for key IT activities in business firms, including IT infrastructure, IT use, and project management. During the last 20 years, three primary modes of IT governance have become prevalent: centralized, decentralized, and the federal mode....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MIS quarterly 1999-06, Vol.23 (2), p.261-290
Main Authors: Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, Robert W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-5583c6bb40596230f46e9f10a9ef8abcfe024977a8ea09a4291e19745c661fe53
cites
container_end_page 290
container_issue 2
container_start_page 261
container_title MIS quarterly
container_volume 23
creator Sambamurthy, V.
Zmud, Robert W.
description IT governance arrangements refers to the patterns of authority for key IT activities in business firms, including IT infrastructure, IT use, and project management. During the last 20 years, three primary modes of IT governance have become prevalent: centralized, decentralized, and the federal mode. These modes vary in the extent to which corporate IS, divisional IS, and line management are vested with authority for the key IT activities. While a significant volume of research has examined the influence of contingency factors on the choice of a specific mode of IT governance, most of this research has examined the singular effects of the contingency factors. The assumption underlying these studies is as though the organizational contingencies act in isolation in influencing the mode of IT governance. However, in reality, business firms are subject to the pulls and pressures of multiple, rather than singular, contingency forces. Therefore, to acknowledge this reality, this study applies the theory of multiple contingencies to examine how contingency forces influence the mode of IT governance. The theory argues that contingency forces interact with each other by either amplifying, dampening, or overriding their mutual influences on the IT governance mode. Three scenarios of multiple, interacting contingencies are identified: reinforcing, conflicting, and dominating. Each of these scenarios of multiple contingencies is hypothesized to influence a particular mode of IT governance. Utilizing rich data from case studies of eight firms, empirical evidence is presented to support these hypotheses. Implications of the multiple contingencies theory for research and for practice are presented.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/249754
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218128140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>249754</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>249754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-5583c6bb40596230f46e9f10a9ef8abcfe024977a8ea09a4291e19745c661fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKv-hqDgbfUlm0023krRWqh4qV6XNLy0W7ZJTVKh_94t69XLzOVjmBlCbhk88hLUExdaVeKMjDiTvNCqhHMyAq5koVRdXpKrlLYAwBRTI_I1idH4Ne7Q50RdiHTue92Z3AZPl2g3PnRhfaSz8IPRG2_xmU7ocoMhHmlw9P3Q5XbfIZ0Gn9s-ydsW0zW5cKZLePPnY_L5-rKcvhWLj9l8OlkUthQ8F1VVl1auVgIqLfvyTkjUjoHR6Gqzsg7htEaZGg1oI7hmyLQSlZWSOazKMbkbcvcxfB8w5WYbDn3NLjWc1YzXTEAPPQyQjSGliK7Zx3Zn4rFh0Jwua4bLevB-ALcph_gf9Qv0N2g9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218128140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Sambamurthy, V. ; Zmud, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sambamurthy, V. ; Zmud, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>IT governance arrangements refers to the patterns of authority for key IT activities in business firms, including IT infrastructure, IT use, and project management. During the last 20 years, three primary modes of IT governance have become prevalent: centralized, decentralized, and the federal mode. These modes vary in the extent to which corporate IS, divisional IS, and line management are vested with authority for the key IT activities. While a significant volume of research has examined the influence of contingency factors on the choice of a specific mode of IT governance, most of this research has examined the singular effects of the contingency factors. The assumption underlying these studies is as though the organizational contingencies act in isolation in influencing the mode of IT governance. However, in reality, business firms are subject to the pulls and pressures of multiple, rather than singular, contingency forces. Therefore, to acknowledge this reality, this study applies the theory of multiple contingencies to examine how contingency forces influence the mode of IT governance. The theory argues that contingency forces interact with each other by either amplifying, dampening, or overriding their mutual influences on the IT governance mode. Three scenarios of multiple, interacting contingencies are identified: reinforcing, conflicting, and dominating. Each of these scenarios of multiple contingencies is hypothesized to influence a particular mode of IT governance. Utilizing rich data from case studies of eight firms, empirical evidence is presented to support these hypotheses. Implications of the multiple contingencies theory for research and for practice are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/249754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MISQDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota, and The Association for Information Systems</publisher><subject>Business structures ; Corporate governance ; Corporations ; Decentralization ; Design ; Economies of scope ; Effects ; Governance ; Hypotheses ; Influence ; Information systems ; Information technology ; Management decisions ; Managerial authority ; Organizational behavior ; Project management ; Qualitative research ; Saliency ; Studies ; Theory</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 1999-06, Vol.23 (2), p.261-290</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 SIM International and the Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC)</rights><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-5583c6bb40596230f46e9f10a9ef8abcfe024977a8ea09a4291e19745c661fe53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/218128140/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/218128140?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339,58213,58446,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sambamurthy, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmud, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>IT governance arrangements refers to the patterns of authority for key IT activities in business firms, including IT infrastructure, IT use, and project management. During the last 20 years, three primary modes of IT governance have become prevalent: centralized, decentralized, and the federal mode. These modes vary in the extent to which corporate IS, divisional IS, and line management are vested with authority for the key IT activities. While a significant volume of research has examined the influence of contingency factors on the choice of a specific mode of IT governance, most of this research has examined the singular effects of the contingency factors. The assumption underlying these studies is as though the organizational contingencies act in isolation in influencing the mode of IT governance. However, in reality, business firms are subject to the pulls and pressures of multiple, rather than singular, contingency forces. Therefore, to acknowledge this reality, this study applies the theory of multiple contingencies to examine how contingency forces influence the mode of IT governance. The theory argues that contingency forces interact with each other by either amplifying, dampening, or overriding their mutual influences on the IT governance mode. Three scenarios of multiple, interacting contingencies are identified: reinforcing, conflicting, and dominating. Each of these scenarios of multiple contingencies is hypothesized to influence a particular mode of IT governance. Utilizing rich data from case studies of eight firms, empirical evidence is presented to support these hypotheses. Implications of the multiple contingencies theory for research and for practice are presented.</description><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Economies of scope</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Managerial authority</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Saliency</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKv-hqDgbfUlm0023krRWqh4qV6XNLy0W7ZJTVKh_94t69XLzOVjmBlCbhk88hLUExdaVeKMjDiTvNCqhHMyAq5koVRdXpKrlLYAwBRTI_I1idH4Ne7Q50RdiHTue92Z3AZPl2g3PnRhfaSz8IPRG2_xmU7ocoMhHmlw9P3Q5XbfIZ0Gn9s-ydsW0zW5cKZLePPnY_L5-rKcvhWLj9l8OlkUthQ8F1VVl1auVgIqLfvyTkjUjoHR6Gqzsg7htEaZGg1oI7hmyLQSlZWSOazKMbkbcvcxfB8w5WYbDn3NLjWc1YzXTEAPPQyQjSGliK7Zx3Zn4rFh0Jwua4bLevB-ALcph_gf9Qv0N2g9</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Sambamurthy, V.</creator><creator>Zmud, Robert W.</creator><general>The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota, and The Association for Information Systems</general><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies</title><author>Sambamurthy, V. ; Zmud, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-5583c6bb40596230f46e9f10a9ef8abcfe024977a8ea09a4291e19745c661fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Economies of scope</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Managerial authority</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Saliency</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sambamurthy, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmud, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sambamurthy, V.</au><au>Zmud, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>261-290</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><coden>MISQDP</coden><abstract>IT governance arrangements refers to the patterns of authority for key IT activities in business firms, including IT infrastructure, IT use, and project management. During the last 20 years, three primary modes of IT governance have become prevalent: centralized, decentralized, and the federal mode. These modes vary in the extent to which corporate IS, divisional IS, and line management are vested with authority for the key IT activities. While a significant volume of research has examined the influence of contingency factors on the choice of a specific mode of IT governance, most of this research has examined the singular effects of the contingency factors. The assumption underlying these studies is as though the organizational contingencies act in isolation in influencing the mode of IT governance. However, in reality, business firms are subject to the pulls and pressures of multiple, rather than singular, contingency forces. Therefore, to acknowledge this reality, this study applies the theory of multiple contingencies to examine how contingency forces influence the mode of IT governance. The theory argues that contingency forces interact with each other by either amplifying, dampening, or overriding their mutual influences on the IT governance mode. Three scenarios of multiple, interacting contingencies are identified: reinforcing, conflicting, and dominating. Each of these scenarios of multiple contingencies is hypothesized to influence a particular mode of IT governance. Utilizing rich data from case studies of eight firms, empirical evidence is presented to support these hypotheses. Implications of the multiple contingencies theory for research and for practice are presented.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota, and The Association for Information Systems</pub><doi>10.2307/249754</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-7783
ispartof MIS quarterly, 1999-06, Vol.23 (2), p.261-290
issn 0276-7783
2162-9730
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218128140
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Business structures
Corporate governance
Corporations
Decentralization
Design
Economies of scope
Effects
Governance
Hypotheses
Influence
Information systems
Information technology
Management decisions
Managerial authority
Organizational behavior
Project management
Qualitative research
Saliency
Studies
Theory
title Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A07%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arrangements%20for%20Information%20Technology%20Governance:%20A%20Theory%20of%20Multiple%20Contingencies&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Sambamurthy,%20V.&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=261-290&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft.coden=MISQDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/249754&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E249754%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-5583c6bb40596230f46e9f10a9ef8abcfe024977a8ea09a4291e19745c661fe53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218128140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=249754&rfr_iscdi=true