Loading…

Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1

Genetic diversity in the U.S. Hereford population was characterized by examining the level and rate of inbreeding and effective population size. Pedigree records for 20,624,418 animals were obtained from the American Hereford Association, of which 96.1% had both parents identified. Inbreeding coeffi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2005-05, Vol.83 (5), p.992-1001
Main Authors: Cleveland, M. A., Blackburn, H. D., Enns, R. M., Garrick, D. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3
container_end_page 1001
container_issue 5
container_start_page 992
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 83
creator Cleveland, M. A.
Blackburn, H. D.
Enns, R. M.
Garrick, D. J.
description Genetic diversity in the U.S. Hereford population was characterized by examining the level and rate of inbreeding and effective population size. Pedigree records for 20,624,418 animals were obtained from the American Hereford Association, of which 96.1% had both parents identified. Inbreeding coefficients were computed and mean inbreeding (F^sub x^) calculated by year from 1900 to 2001. Inbreeding increased rapidly between 1900 and 1945. From 1946, inbreeding increased linearly to a maximum of 11.5% in 1966. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, mean inbreeding decreased to mid-century levels. Several alternatives were investigated to explain this decline. The average relationship between prominent sires fell from 20 to 12% during the time that the level of inbreeding decreased, which reflects an increase in the popularity of certain less fashionable sire lines that would have temporarily decreased inbreeding. Pedigrees were constructed for animals born after 1990. This subsample of animals with no missing ancestors in at least 12 generations did not exhibit a decrease in inbreeding. Missing ancestral information therefore contributed to the apparent decline. One cause of missing ancestry results from outcrossing to imported animals. The effect of missing ancestry was investigated by simulating the missing ancestors. In 2001, F^sub x^ was 9.8%, and approximately 95% of individuals were inbred. The maximal inbreeding coefficient was 76%. The annual change in mean inbreeding (ΔF^sub x^) was estimated for Herefords born during five time periods from 1946 to 2001, where inbreeding was changing at different linear rates. The ΔF^sub x^ for the most recent generation (1990 to 2001) was 0.12%/yr. Assuming a generation interval of 4.88 yr, the estimated effective population size was 85. This study provides a benchmark of current genetic diversity in the Hereford population. Results indicate that inbreeding is accumulating linearly and below critical levels. Increases in the adoption of reproductive technologies could decrease genetic diversity, and in the future, we may need to consider strategies to minimize inbreeding. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2005.835992x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218133467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>874919951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtLw0AQhRdRMFbf_AGLzybu7HZvj1KqFQo-WJ-XvaVN0aTuJmj_vQktHJgD5zAzfAjdA6kop_KJEsIrxbjW9O8CFcApLxkIdokKQiiUSgG9Rjc57wkByjUv0HKxs-02Zty0o1yKMTTtFnc1_qw-KryKKdZdChmHIU1Bv4u4_41t38R-h_1ohnSEW3RV268c785zhjYvy81iVa7fX98Wz-vSA5GyVJzYQDhoC4IK6cFaDtLxORPOieC0VypEFnQAaaN3Ljhez6XXSnhRBzZDD6e1h9T9DDH3Zt8NqR0vGgoKGJsLOZYeTyWfupzH980hNd82HQ0QM2EyEyZzxsT-AQJvWaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218133467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Cleveland, M. A. ; Blackburn, H. D. ; Enns, R. M. ; Garrick, D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M. A. ; Blackburn, H. D. ; Enns, R. M. ; Garrick, D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Genetic diversity in the U.S. Hereford population was characterized by examining the level and rate of inbreeding and effective population size. Pedigree records for 20,624,418 animals were obtained from the American Hereford Association, of which 96.1% had both parents identified. Inbreeding coefficients were computed and mean inbreeding (F^sub x^) calculated by year from 1900 to 2001. Inbreeding increased rapidly between 1900 and 1945. From 1946, inbreeding increased linearly to a maximum of 11.5% in 1966. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, mean inbreeding decreased to mid-century levels. Several alternatives were investigated to explain this decline. The average relationship between prominent sires fell from 20 to 12% during the time that the level of inbreeding decreased, which reflects an increase in the popularity of certain less fashionable sire lines that would have temporarily decreased inbreeding. Pedigrees were constructed for animals born after 1990. This subsample of animals with no missing ancestors in at least 12 generations did not exhibit a decrease in inbreeding. Missing ancestral information therefore contributed to the apparent decline. One cause of missing ancestry results from outcrossing to imported animals. The effect of missing ancestry was investigated by simulating the missing ancestors. In 2001, F^sub x^ was 9.8%, and approximately 95% of individuals were inbred. The maximal inbreeding coefficient was 76%. The annual change in mean inbreeding (ΔF^sub x^) was estimated for Herefords born during five time periods from 1946 to 2001, where inbreeding was changing at different linear rates. The ΔF^sub x^ for the most recent generation (1990 to 2001) was 0.12%/yr. Assuming a generation interval of 4.88 yr, the estimated effective population size was 85. This study provides a benchmark of current genetic diversity in the Hereford population. Results indicate that inbreeding is accumulating linearly and below critical levels. Increases in the adoption of reproductive technologies could decrease genetic diversity, and in the future, we may need to consider strategies to minimize inbreeding. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2005.835992x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Cattle ; Genetic diversity ; Inbreeding ; Population density ; Reproductive technologies</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2005-05, Vol.83 (5), p.992-1001</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, H. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enns, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Genetic diversity in the U.S. Hereford population was characterized by examining the level and rate of inbreeding and effective population size. Pedigree records for 20,624,418 animals were obtained from the American Hereford Association, of which 96.1% had both parents identified. Inbreeding coefficients were computed and mean inbreeding (F^sub x^) calculated by year from 1900 to 2001. Inbreeding increased rapidly between 1900 and 1945. From 1946, inbreeding increased linearly to a maximum of 11.5% in 1966. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, mean inbreeding decreased to mid-century levels. Several alternatives were investigated to explain this decline. The average relationship between prominent sires fell from 20 to 12% during the time that the level of inbreeding decreased, which reflects an increase in the popularity of certain less fashionable sire lines that would have temporarily decreased inbreeding. Pedigrees were constructed for animals born after 1990. This subsample of animals with no missing ancestors in at least 12 generations did not exhibit a decrease in inbreeding. Missing ancestral information therefore contributed to the apparent decline. One cause of missing ancestry results from outcrossing to imported animals. The effect of missing ancestry was investigated by simulating the missing ancestors. In 2001, F^sub x^ was 9.8%, and approximately 95% of individuals were inbred. The maximal inbreeding coefficient was 76%. The annual change in mean inbreeding (ΔF^sub x^) was estimated for Herefords born during five time periods from 1946 to 2001, where inbreeding was changing at different linear rates. The ΔF^sub x^ for the most recent generation (1990 to 2001) was 0.12%/yr. Assuming a generation interval of 4.88 yr, the estimated effective population size was 85. This study provides a benchmark of current genetic diversity in the Hereford population. Results indicate that inbreeding is accumulating linearly and below critical levels. Increases in the adoption of reproductive technologies could decrease genetic diversity, and in the future, we may need to consider strategies to minimize inbreeding. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkFtLw0AQhRdRMFbf_AGLzybu7HZvj1KqFQo-WJ-XvaVN0aTuJmj_vQktHJgD5zAzfAjdA6kop_KJEsIrxbjW9O8CFcApLxkIdokKQiiUSgG9Rjc57wkByjUv0HKxs-02Zty0o1yKMTTtFnc1_qw-KryKKdZdChmHIU1Bv4u4_41t38R-h_1ohnSEW3RV268c785zhjYvy81iVa7fX98Wz-vSA5GyVJzYQDhoC4IK6cFaDtLxORPOieC0VypEFnQAaaN3Ljhez6XXSnhRBzZDD6e1h9T9DDH3Zt8NqR0vGgoKGJsLOZYeTyWfupzH980hNd82HQ0QM2EyEyZzxsT-AQJvWaI</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Cleveland, M. A.</creator><creator>Blackburn, H. D.</creator><creator>Enns, R. M.</creator><creator>Garrick, D. J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1</title><author>Cleveland, M. A. ; Blackburn, H. D. ; Enns, R. M. ; Garrick, D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, H. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enns, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleveland, M. A.</au><au>Blackburn, H. D.</au><au>Enns, R. M.</au><au>Garrick, D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>992-1001</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Genetic diversity in the U.S. Hereford population was characterized by examining the level and rate of inbreeding and effective population size. Pedigree records for 20,624,418 animals were obtained from the American Hereford Association, of which 96.1% had both parents identified. Inbreeding coefficients were computed and mean inbreeding (F^sub x^) calculated by year from 1900 to 2001. Inbreeding increased rapidly between 1900 and 1945. From 1946, inbreeding increased linearly to a maximum of 11.5% in 1966. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, mean inbreeding decreased to mid-century levels. Several alternatives were investigated to explain this decline. The average relationship between prominent sires fell from 20 to 12% during the time that the level of inbreeding decreased, which reflects an increase in the popularity of certain less fashionable sire lines that would have temporarily decreased inbreeding. Pedigrees were constructed for animals born after 1990. This subsample of animals with no missing ancestors in at least 12 generations did not exhibit a decrease in inbreeding. Missing ancestral information therefore contributed to the apparent decline. One cause of missing ancestry results from outcrossing to imported animals. The effect of missing ancestry was investigated by simulating the missing ancestors. In 2001, F^sub x^ was 9.8%, and approximately 95% of individuals were inbred. The maximal inbreeding coefficient was 76%. The annual change in mean inbreeding (ΔF^sub x^) was estimated for Herefords born during five time periods from 1946 to 2001, where inbreeding was changing at different linear rates. The ΔF^sub x^ for the most recent generation (1990 to 2001) was 0.12%/yr. Assuming a generation interval of 4.88 yr, the estimated effective population size was 85. This study provides a benchmark of current genetic diversity in the Hereford population. Results indicate that inbreeding is accumulating linearly and below critical levels. Increases in the adoption of reproductive technologies could decrease genetic diversity, and in the future, we may need to consider strategies to minimize inbreeding. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/2005.835992x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2005-05, Vol.83 (5), p.992-1001
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218133467
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal populations
Cattle
Genetic diversity
Inbreeding
Population density
Reproductive technologies
title Changes in inbreeding of U.S. Herefords during the twentieth century1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20inbreeding%20of%20U.S.%20Herefords%20during%20the%20twentieth%20century1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Cleveland,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=992-1001&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2005.835992x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874919951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1077-850ad0519a16267c1aa517b5436bb6db9c88de3d9d17aecbbdb5f47c986c6fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218133467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true