Loading…

Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and wet distillers grain plus solubles (WDGS) in dry-rolled and high-moisture corn-based finishing diets for beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 250 steers (BW = 343 ± 13.5 kg) were fed 5 treatments consisting of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2010-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1061-1072
Main Authors: Loza, P. L., Buckner, C. D., Vander Pol, K. J., Erickson, G. E., Klopfenstein, T. J., Stock, R. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53
container_end_page 1072
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1061
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 88
creator Loza, P. L.
Buckner, C. D.
Vander Pol, K. J.
Erickson, G. E.
Klopfenstein, T. J.
Stock, R. A.
description Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and wet distillers grain plus solubles (WDGS) in dry-rolled and high-moisture corn-based finishing diets for beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 250 steers (BW = 343 ± 13.5 kg) were fed 5 treatments consisting of a corn-based, control diet with 0% coproducts, and diets including 30% WCGF, 30% WDGS, 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS, or 30% WCGF plus 30% WDGS. No associative effects resulted from feeding 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS; DMI, ADG, and G:F were intermediate between steers fed WCGF or WDGS at 30% of diet DM. Feeding coproducts in combinations at 30 and 60% of diet DM increased ADG, G:F, and final BW (P < 0.05) compared with the corn-based diet. In Exp. 2, 280 yearling steers (BW 370 ± 0.45 kg) were used to evaluate feeding 0, 25, 50, or 75% coproducts as a combination of 50% WCGF:50% WDGS (DM basis). Additional diets were fed containing decreased alfalfa hay at 5, 2.5, and 0% (DM basis) as coproduct blend inclusions increased at 25, 50, and 75% (DM basis), respectively. No interactions were observed between alfalfa hay and coproduct blend levels, and no effects on ADG or G:F (P > 0.21) were observed due to alfalfa hay. Intake, ADG, and G:F responded quadratically (P < 0.05) across coproduct levels, with the greatest ADG and G:F at 25 and 50% blend, and similar ADG and G:F for the 0 and 75% blend levels. In Exp. 3, 504 steers (BW = 376 + 16 kg) were fed to evaluate 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% (DM basis) WDGS in diets containing 30% WCGF (DM basis) as well as a control diet with no coproducts. The inclusion of 30% WCGF in the diets increased DMI, ADG. and G:F (P < 0.05) when compared with control. Response to inclusion level of WDGS tended to be quadratic for DMI (P = 0.12), quadratic for ADG (P 0.05), and no effect for G:F (P 0.96). Greatest ADG was achieved with 15 to 20% WDGS inclusion in diets containing 30% WCGF. The use of combinations of WCGF and WDGS in finishing diets resulted in similar or improved steer performance compared with corn, suggesting replacement of corn with coproduct combinations up to 75% diet DM is possible if a roughage source is fed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas.2009-2190
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218144807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992505271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtH74v3rZlk0yRHKdUKBS96DtlkUrZsNzVJEf-9u62nB_M93sBHyCPQBRNMPu9tXjBKdc1A0ysyA8FEzWHJr8mMUga1UsBuyV3Oe0qBCS1mxK1DQFeqGKqA6LthV7l4aLvBli4Oebr_YKl8l0vX95hytUu2G4Ed_Jm4mIZq158KDueFqsRz9nFktpQe4Z7cBNtnfPjPOfl6XX-uNvX24-199bKtHVAta0DpvfAtSCVa7l1o2VLrIAXw1qPy3qvQcHQeuGga2zC3FBaklhpbZVHwOXm67B5T_D5hLmYfT2kYXxoGCppGUTmW6kvJpZhzwmCOqTvY9GuAmkmjGTWaSaOZNPI_OHZmpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218144807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Loza, P. L. ; Buckner, C. D. ; Vander Pol, K. J. ; Erickson, G. E. ; Klopfenstein, T. J. ; Stock, R. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loza, P. L. ; Buckner, C. D. ; Vander Pol, K. J. ; Erickson, G. E. ; Klopfenstein, T. J. ; Stock, R. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and wet distillers grain plus solubles (WDGS) in dry-rolled and high-moisture corn-based finishing diets for beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 250 steers (BW = 343 ± 13.5 kg) were fed 5 treatments consisting of a corn-based, control diet with 0% coproducts, and diets including 30% WCGF, 30% WDGS, 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS, or 30% WCGF plus 30% WDGS. No associative effects resulted from feeding 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS; DMI, ADG, and G:F were intermediate between steers fed WCGF or WDGS at 30% of diet DM. Feeding coproducts in combinations at 30 and 60% of diet DM increased ADG, G:F, and final BW (P &lt; 0.05) compared with the corn-based diet. In Exp. 2, 280 yearling steers (BW 370 ± 0.45 kg) were used to evaluate feeding 0, 25, 50, or 75% coproducts as a combination of 50% WCGF:50% WDGS (DM basis). Additional diets were fed containing decreased alfalfa hay at 5, 2.5, and 0% (DM basis) as coproduct blend inclusions increased at 25, 50, and 75% (DM basis), respectively. No interactions were observed between alfalfa hay and coproduct blend levels, and no effects on ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.21) were observed due to alfalfa hay. Intake, ADG, and G:F responded quadratically (P &lt; 0.05) across coproduct levels, with the greatest ADG and G:F at 25 and 50% blend, and similar ADG and G:F for the 0 and 75% blend levels. In Exp. 3, 504 steers (BW = 376 + 16 kg) were fed to evaluate 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% (DM basis) WDGS in diets containing 30% WCGF (DM basis) as well as a control diet with no coproducts. The inclusion of 30% WCGF in the diets increased DMI, ADG. and G:F (P &lt; 0.05) when compared with control. Response to inclusion level of WDGS tended to be quadratic for DMI (P = 0.12), quadratic for ADG (P 0.05), and no effect for G:F (P 0.96). Greatest ADG was achieved with 15 to 20% WDGS inclusion in diets containing 30% WCGF. The use of combinations of WCGF and WDGS in finishing diets resulted in similar or improved steer performance compared with corn, suggesting replacement of corn with coproduct combinations up to 75% diet DM is possible if a roughage source is fed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal sciences ; Cattle ; Corn ; Feeds</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2010-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1061-1072</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loza, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckner, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Pol, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopfenstein, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, R. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and wet distillers grain plus solubles (WDGS) in dry-rolled and high-moisture corn-based finishing diets for beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 250 steers (BW = 343 ± 13.5 kg) were fed 5 treatments consisting of a corn-based, control diet with 0% coproducts, and diets including 30% WCGF, 30% WDGS, 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS, or 30% WCGF plus 30% WDGS. No associative effects resulted from feeding 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS; DMI, ADG, and G:F were intermediate between steers fed WCGF or WDGS at 30% of diet DM. Feeding coproducts in combinations at 30 and 60% of diet DM increased ADG, G:F, and final BW (P &lt; 0.05) compared with the corn-based diet. In Exp. 2, 280 yearling steers (BW 370 ± 0.45 kg) were used to evaluate feeding 0, 25, 50, or 75% coproducts as a combination of 50% WCGF:50% WDGS (DM basis). Additional diets were fed containing decreased alfalfa hay at 5, 2.5, and 0% (DM basis) as coproduct blend inclusions increased at 25, 50, and 75% (DM basis), respectively. No interactions were observed between alfalfa hay and coproduct blend levels, and no effects on ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.21) were observed due to alfalfa hay. Intake, ADG, and G:F responded quadratically (P &lt; 0.05) across coproduct levels, with the greatest ADG and G:F at 25 and 50% blend, and similar ADG and G:F for the 0 and 75% blend levels. In Exp. 3, 504 steers (BW = 376 + 16 kg) were fed to evaluate 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% (DM basis) WDGS in diets containing 30% WCGF (DM basis) as well as a control diet with no coproducts. The inclusion of 30% WCGF in the diets increased DMI, ADG. and G:F (P &lt; 0.05) when compared with control. Response to inclusion level of WDGS tended to be quadratic for DMI (P = 0.12), quadratic for ADG (P 0.05), and no effect for G:F (P 0.96). Greatest ADG was achieved with 15 to 20% WDGS inclusion in diets containing 30% WCGF. The use of combinations of WCGF and WDGS in finishing diets resulted in similar or improved steer performance compared with corn, suggesting replacement of corn with coproduct combinations up to 75% diet DM is possible if a roughage source is fed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtH74v3rZlk0yRHKdUKBS96DtlkUrZsNzVJEf-9u62nB_M93sBHyCPQBRNMPu9tXjBKdc1A0ysyA8FEzWHJr8mMUga1UsBuyV3Oe0qBCS1mxK1DQFeqGKqA6LthV7l4aLvBli4Oebr_YKl8l0vX95hytUu2G4Ed_Jm4mIZq158KDueFqsRz9nFktpQe4Z7cBNtnfPjPOfl6XX-uNvX24-199bKtHVAta0DpvfAtSCVa7l1o2VLrIAXw1qPy3qvQcHQeuGga2zC3FBaklhpbZVHwOXm67B5T_D5hLmYfT2kYXxoGCppGUTmW6kvJpZhzwmCOqTvY9GuAmkmjGTWaSaOZNPI_OHZmpQ</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Loza, P. L.</creator><creator>Buckner, C. D.</creator><creator>Vander Pol, K. J.</creator><creator>Erickson, G. E.</creator><creator>Klopfenstein, T. J.</creator><creator>Stock, R. A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1</title><author>Loza, P. L. ; Buckner, C. D. ; Vander Pol, K. J. ; Erickson, G. E. ; Klopfenstein, T. J. ; Stock, R. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loza, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckner, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Pol, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopfenstein, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, R. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career and Technical Education</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loza, P. L.</au><au>Buckner, C. D.</au><au>Vander Pol, K. J.</au><au>Erickson, G. E.</au><au>Klopfenstein, T. J.</au><au>Stock, R. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1072</epage><pages>1061-1072</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of combinations of wet corn gluten feed (WCGF) and wet distillers grain plus solubles (WDGS) in dry-rolled and high-moisture corn-based finishing diets for beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 250 steers (BW = 343 ± 13.5 kg) were fed 5 treatments consisting of a corn-based, control diet with 0% coproducts, and diets including 30% WCGF, 30% WDGS, 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS, or 30% WCGF plus 30% WDGS. No associative effects resulted from feeding 15% WCGF plus 15% WDGS; DMI, ADG, and G:F were intermediate between steers fed WCGF or WDGS at 30% of diet DM. Feeding coproducts in combinations at 30 and 60% of diet DM increased ADG, G:F, and final BW (P &lt; 0.05) compared with the corn-based diet. In Exp. 2, 280 yearling steers (BW 370 ± 0.45 kg) were used to evaluate feeding 0, 25, 50, or 75% coproducts as a combination of 50% WCGF:50% WDGS (DM basis). Additional diets were fed containing decreased alfalfa hay at 5, 2.5, and 0% (DM basis) as coproduct blend inclusions increased at 25, 50, and 75% (DM basis), respectively. No interactions were observed between alfalfa hay and coproduct blend levels, and no effects on ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.21) were observed due to alfalfa hay. Intake, ADG, and G:F responded quadratically (P &lt; 0.05) across coproduct levels, with the greatest ADG and G:F at 25 and 50% blend, and similar ADG and G:F for the 0 and 75% blend levels. In Exp. 3, 504 steers (BW = 376 + 16 kg) were fed to evaluate 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% (DM basis) WDGS in diets containing 30% WCGF (DM basis) as well as a control diet with no coproducts. The inclusion of 30% WCGF in the diets increased DMI, ADG. and G:F (P &lt; 0.05) when compared with control. Response to inclusion level of WDGS tended to be quadratic for DMI (P = 0.12), quadratic for ADG (P 0.05), and no effect for G:F (P 0.96). Greatest ADG was achieved with 15 to 20% WDGS inclusion in diets containing 30% WCGF. The use of combinations of WCGF and WDGS in finishing diets resulted in similar or improved steer performance compared with corn, suggesting replacement of corn with coproduct combinations up to 75% diet DM is possible if a roughage source is fed. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas.2009-2190</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2010-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1061-1072
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218144807
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal sciences
Cattle
Corn
Feeds
title Effect of feeding combinations of wet distillers grains and wet corn gluten feed to feedlot cattle1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20feeding%20combinations%20of%20wet%20distillers%20grains%20and%20wet%20corn%20gluten%20feed%20to%20feedlot%20cattle1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Loza,%20P.%20L.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1072&rft.pages=1061-1072&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2009-2190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992505271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1097-1e7dd5db1785b3dcfb2699f7513bde8ddd8f43ecd13544a42c65a17979eb8ae53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218144807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true