Loading…

Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers

•Numerical study on the seismic behaviour of masonry towers.•Critical insight into the results obtained.•Comparison between seismic risk of confined and unconfined structure. This study analyses the seismic risk of a confined historic masonry tower located in Italy (San Gimignano) critically discuss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering structures 2019-02, Vol.180, p.713-727
Main Authors: Bartoli, Gianni, Betti, Michele, Galano, Luciano, Zini, Giacomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3
container_end_page 727
container_issue
container_start_page 713
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 180
creator Bartoli, Gianni
Betti, Michele
Galano, Luciano
Zini, Giacomo
description •Numerical study on the seismic behaviour of masonry towers.•Critical insight into the results obtained.•Comparison between seismic risk of confined and unconfined structure. This study analyses the seismic risk of a confined historic masonry tower located in Italy (San Gimignano) critically discussing the multilevel assessment path proposed by the Italian “Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of the seismic risk of the cultural heritage”. Specifically, these guidelines identify a methodological path which aims to coordinate the phases of investigation and drive the grade of resolution of the structural assessment, depending on different possible objectives. The paper compares the results obtained with the three different levels of evaluation employed to estimate the seismic risk of the tower: level LV1 (analysis at territorial scale), level LV2 (local analysis) and level LV3 (global analysis). The main variables considered are the mechanical properties of the masonry walls and the degree of constraint generated by the buildings surrounding the tower with specific attention to the latter variable. Numerical insights on the seismic behaviour of the tower are presented and discussed through a comparative approach. The obtained results show significant differences between the numerical models of the confined and the isolated tower in terms of both capacity curves and damage pattern and point out the needs of additional studies regarding the numerical assessment of the effects of the interaction between a tower and its adjacent lower buildings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2181756319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029618302086</els_id><sourcerecordid>2181756319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwG4jEucVu0qY9ThNfEoILnKM2dbeUrRlJC9q_J9MQV06W_H5Yfhi7RkgRsLjtUxpWYfSTGdMMsIzbFABP2AxLJRIlMnHKZoASE8iq4pxdhNADQFaWMGOLl2lL3pp6w-0Q7Go9Bu4GPq6JB7Jhaw33Nnxw13Hjhs4O1PJtHdzg93x03-TDJTvr6k2gq985Z-_3d2_Lx-T59eFpuXhOjJBiTOqilqJqIDdNngss204VGai2qVqUUuZNl5muUQQFIUJXSAktVpJIGKOiLObs5ti78-5zojDq3k1-iCd1hiWqvBBYRZc6uox3IXjq9M7bbe33GkEfeOle__HSB14HIfKKycUxSfGJL0teB2NpMNRaT9HbOvtvxw8tfnhP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2181756319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Bartoli, Gianni ; Betti, Michele ; Galano, Luciano ; Zini, Giacomo</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartoli, Gianni ; Betti, Michele ; Galano, Luciano ; Zini, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><description>•Numerical study on the seismic behaviour of masonry towers.•Critical insight into the results obtained.•Comparison between seismic risk of confined and unconfined structure. This study analyses the seismic risk of a confined historic masonry tower located in Italy (San Gimignano) critically discussing the multilevel assessment path proposed by the Italian “Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of the seismic risk of the cultural heritage”. Specifically, these guidelines identify a methodological path which aims to coordinate the phases of investigation and drive the grade of resolution of the structural assessment, depending on different possible objectives. The paper compares the results obtained with the three different levels of evaluation employed to estimate the seismic risk of the tower: level LV1 (analysis at territorial scale), level LV2 (local analysis) and level LV3 (global analysis). The main variables considered are the mechanical properties of the masonry walls and the degree of constraint generated by the buildings surrounding the tower with specific attention to the latter variable. Numerical insights on the seismic behaviour of the tower are presented and discussed through a comparative approach. The obtained results show significant differences between the numerical models of the confined and the isolated tower in terms of both capacity curves and damage pattern and point out the needs of additional studies regarding the numerical assessment of the effects of the interaction between a tower and its adjacent lower buildings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Confined masonry towers ; Cracking pattern ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Damage patterns ; Earthquake damage ; Environmental risk ; Finite Element modelling ; Guidelines ; Historical buildings ; Historical structures ; Italian Guidelines ; Masonry ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical properties ; Mitigation ; Nonlinear static analyses ; Risk assessment ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic response ; Seismic risk assessment</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2019-02, Vol.180, p.713-727</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5536-3269 ; 0000-0002-8389-3355</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartoli, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betti, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galano, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zini, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•Numerical study on the seismic behaviour of masonry towers.•Critical insight into the results obtained.•Comparison between seismic risk of confined and unconfined structure. This study analyses the seismic risk of a confined historic masonry tower located in Italy (San Gimignano) critically discussing the multilevel assessment path proposed by the Italian “Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of the seismic risk of the cultural heritage”. Specifically, these guidelines identify a methodological path which aims to coordinate the phases of investigation and drive the grade of resolution of the structural assessment, depending on different possible objectives. The paper compares the results obtained with the three different levels of evaluation employed to estimate the seismic risk of the tower: level LV1 (analysis at territorial scale), level LV2 (local analysis) and level LV3 (global analysis). The main variables considered are the mechanical properties of the masonry walls and the degree of constraint generated by the buildings surrounding the tower with specific attention to the latter variable. Numerical insights on the seismic behaviour of the tower are presented and discussed through a comparative approach. The obtained results show significant differences between the numerical models of the confined and the isolated tower in terms of both capacity curves and damage pattern and point out the needs of additional studies regarding the numerical assessment of the effects of the interaction between a tower and its adjacent lower buildings.</description><subject>Confined masonry towers</subject><subject>Cracking pattern</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Damage patterns</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Finite Element modelling</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Historical buildings</subject><subject>Historical structures</subject><subject>Italian Guidelines</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Nonlinear static analyses</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic risk assessment</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwG4jEucVu0qY9ThNfEoILnKM2dbeUrRlJC9q_J9MQV06W_H5Yfhi7RkgRsLjtUxpWYfSTGdMMsIzbFABP2AxLJRIlMnHKZoASE8iq4pxdhNADQFaWMGOLl2lL3pp6w-0Q7Go9Bu4GPq6JB7Jhaw33Nnxw13Hjhs4O1PJtHdzg93x03-TDJTvr6k2gq985Z-_3d2_Lx-T59eFpuXhOjJBiTOqilqJqIDdNngss204VGai2qVqUUuZNl5muUQQFIUJXSAktVpJIGKOiLObs5ti78-5zojDq3k1-iCd1hiWqvBBYRZc6uox3IXjq9M7bbe33GkEfeOle__HSB14HIfKKycUxSfGJL0teB2NpMNRaT9HbOvtvxw8tfnhP</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Bartoli, Gianni</creator><creator>Betti, Michele</creator><creator>Galano, Luciano</creator><creator>Zini, Giacomo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5536-3269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8389-3355</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers</title><author>Bartoli, Gianni ; Betti, Michele ; Galano, Luciano ; Zini, Giacomo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Confined masonry towers</topic><topic>Cracking pattern</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Damage patterns</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Finite Element modelling</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Historical buildings</topic><topic>Historical structures</topic><topic>Italian Guidelines</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Nonlinear static analyses</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic risk assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartoli, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betti, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galano, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zini, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartoli, Gianni</au><au>Betti, Michele</au><au>Galano, Luciano</au><au>Zini, Giacomo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>180</volume><spage>713</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>713-727</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•Numerical study on the seismic behaviour of masonry towers.•Critical insight into the results obtained.•Comparison between seismic risk of confined and unconfined structure. This study analyses the seismic risk of a confined historic masonry tower located in Italy (San Gimignano) critically discussing the multilevel assessment path proposed by the Italian “Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of the seismic risk of the cultural heritage”. Specifically, these guidelines identify a methodological path which aims to coordinate the phases of investigation and drive the grade of resolution of the structural assessment, depending on different possible objectives. The paper compares the results obtained with the three different levels of evaluation employed to estimate the seismic risk of the tower: level LV1 (analysis at territorial scale), level LV2 (local analysis) and level LV3 (global analysis). The main variables considered are the mechanical properties of the masonry walls and the degree of constraint generated by the buildings surrounding the tower with specific attention to the latter variable. Numerical insights on the seismic behaviour of the tower are presented and discussed through a comparative approach. The obtained results show significant differences between the numerical models of the confined and the isolated tower in terms of both capacity curves and damage pattern and point out the needs of additional studies regarding the numerical assessment of the effects of the interaction between a tower and its adjacent lower buildings.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.001</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5536-3269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8389-3355</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2019-02, Vol.180, p.713-727
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2181756319
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Confined masonry towers
Cracking pattern
Cultural heritage
Cultural resources
Damage patterns
Earthquake damage
Environmental risk
Finite Element modelling
Guidelines
Historical buildings
Historical structures
Italian Guidelines
Masonry
Mathematical models
Mechanical properties
Mitigation
Nonlinear static analyses
Risk assessment
Seismic activity
Seismic engineering
Seismic hazard
Seismic response
Seismic risk assessment
title Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20insights%20on%20the%20seismic%20risk%20of%20confined%20masonry%20towers&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Bartoli,%20Gianni&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=180&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=713-727&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2181756319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-a6a439b05cb55318df76207db9d14445bf2cfb7e06e110f6440d194ee3cc745b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2181756319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true