Loading…

Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics

Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Creativity and innovation management 2019-03, Vol.28 (1), p.30-41
Main Authors: Cai, Wenjing, Lysova, Evgenia I., Bossink, Bart A. G., Khapova, Svetlana N., Wang, Weidong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Creativity and innovation management
container_volume 28
creator Cai, Wenjing
Lysova, Evgenia I.
Bossink, Bart A. G.
Khapova, Svetlana N.
Wang, Weidong
description Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/caim.12277
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2182934371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2182934371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGleOL8sqsqfioVwaKsI8cet66SOthpUXY9AmfkJCSUNbN5o9E3bzSPkGtgE-jrTgpTTyAM0_SEjCBK0iBLcjglI5YnPIAkZ-fkwvsNYyziIYzI4c13cm0ruzJSVFSKxrS9iq2iHiv9ffhy2FjXoqJYN5XtEKl0KFqzN213T5drpLVV6PrJdkWdrZBaTf2uQbc33rqhHQx-LTe2pHItnJAtOuNbI_0lOdOi8nj1p2Py_viwnD0Hi9en-Wy6CGTE-zdiBmGuMNSoIFYs1ZwBxIlUqSgFk6UWZYnIM64EL1UOMZdKa5BZlmGelxEfk5ujb-Psxw59W2zszm37k0UIWZjziKfQU7dHSjrrvUNdNM7UwnUFsGJIuBgSLn4T7mE4wp-mwu4fsphN5y_HnR_j84MZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2182934371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</source><creator>Cai, Wenjing ; Lysova, Evgenia I. ; Bossink, Bart A. G. ; Khapova, Svetlana N. ; Wang, Weidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenjing ; Lysova, Evgenia I. ; Bossink, Bart A. G. ; Khapova, Svetlana N. ; Wang, Weidong</creatorcontrib><description>Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/caim.12277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Creativity ; Employee attitude ; Psychology ; Supervisors ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Creativity and innovation management, 2019-03, Vol.28 (1), p.30-41</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0000-5851</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34130</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysova, Evgenia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossink, Bart A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khapova, Svetlana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weidong</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics</title><title>Creativity and innovation management</title><description>Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.</description><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0963-1690</issn><issn>1467-8691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>F29</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGleOL8sqsqfioVwaKsI8cet66SOthpUXY9AmfkJCSUNbN5o9E3bzSPkGtgE-jrTgpTTyAM0_SEjCBK0iBLcjglI5YnPIAkZ-fkwvsNYyziIYzI4c13cm0ruzJSVFSKxrS9iq2iHiv9ffhy2FjXoqJYN5XtEKl0KFqzN213T5drpLVV6PrJdkWdrZBaTf2uQbc33rqhHQx-LTe2pHItnJAtOuNbI_0lOdOi8nj1p2Py_viwnD0Hi9en-Wy6CGTE-zdiBmGuMNSoIFYs1ZwBxIlUqSgFk6UWZYnIM64EL1UOMZdKa5BZlmGelxEfk5ujb-Psxw59W2zszm37k0UIWZjziKfQU7dHSjrrvUNdNM7UwnUFsGJIuBgSLn4T7mE4wp-mwu4fsphN5y_HnR_j84MZ</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Cai, Wenjing</creator><creator>Lysova, Evgenia I.</creator><creator>Bossink, Bart A. G.</creator><creator>Khapova, Svetlana N.</creator><creator>Wang, Weidong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-5851</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics</title><author>Cai, Wenjing ; Lysova, Evgenia I. ; Bossink, Bart A. G. ; Khapova, Svetlana N. ; Wang, Weidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysova, Evgenia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossink, Bart A. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khapova, Svetlana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weidong</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Wenjing</au><au>Lysova, Evgenia I.</au><au>Bossink, Bart A. G.</au><au>Khapova, Svetlana N.</au><au>Wang, Weidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>30-41</pages><issn>0963-1690</issn><eissn>1467-8691</eissn><abstract>Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/caim.12277</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-5851</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-1690
ispartof Creativity and innovation management, 2019-03, Vol.28 (1), p.30-41
issn 0963-1690
1467-8691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2182934371
source Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)
subjects Creativity
Employee attitude
Psychology
Supervisors
Work environment
title Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20capital%20and%20self%E2%80%90reported%20employee%20creativity:%20The%20moderating%20role%20of%20supervisor%20support%20and%20job%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20and%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Cai,%20Wenjing&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=30-41&rft.issn=0963-1690&rft.eissn=1467-8691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/caim.12277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2182934371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-50129de2fed15d07f301156cd7aba0cbfabbee383da3bd9153cdff1c888e99b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2182934371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true