Loading…

The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL

Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Innovative higher education 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202
Main Authors: Hill, Lucas B., Savoy, Julia N., Austin, Ann E., Bantawa, Bipana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3
container_end_page 202
container_issue 3
container_start_page 187
container_title Innovative higher education
container_volume 44
creator Hill, Lucas B.
Savoy, Julia N.
Austin, Ann E.
Bantawa, Bipana
description Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2183929676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1216790</ericid><sourcerecordid>2183929676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8BzNJN1k401K1ZVWoV3PYT9mdWvbrUkW6b93y4p68TSH5513mIeQc-BXwLm-9sB1FDEOhpmRAqYPyAAiLRnoKD4kA65HgkVK6GNy4v2Scw4dGZAyfUOarLdZEWhT0Vm7CjVLNj7UoQ11s8lWdJFOZnSOVePW9AnDZ-PePW02dIbrHB39E_Y39JaOM490Edpyty8cJ_N0ekqOqmzl8ex7DsnL3SQdP7Dp830yvp2yQso4MOQ6l3kuYyUQslxhESnEzEQGVcVlDqMYRK4LXipTCpXHsgLgwKPYgNaqlENy2fduXfPRog922bSu-8FbAbE0wiituhT0qcI13jus7NbV68ztLHC7l2l7mbaTafcyre52LvoddHXxk588ggClDe-46Lnv2OYV3e_l_0u_ANJxfwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183929676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-5627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>College students ; Cooperative Programs ; Education ; Education policy ; Education reform ; Educational Benefits ; Educational Change ; Higher Education ; Learning ; Mathematics ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Professional development ; STEM Education ; Student attitudes ; Translation ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Innovative higher education, 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Innovative Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2183929676/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2183929676?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,62661,62662,62677,74068,74093,74269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1216790$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoy, Julia N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><title>Innovative higher education</title><addtitle>Innov High Educ</addtitle><description>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cooperative Programs</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0742-5627</issn><issn>1573-1758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8BzNJN1k401K1ZVWoV3PYT9mdWvbrUkW6b93y4p68TSH5513mIeQc-BXwLm-9sB1FDEOhpmRAqYPyAAiLRnoKD4kA65HgkVK6GNy4v2Scw4dGZAyfUOarLdZEWhT0Vm7CjVLNj7UoQ11s8lWdJFOZnSOVePW9AnDZ-PePW02dIbrHB39E_Y39JaOM490Edpyty8cJ_N0ekqOqmzl8ex7DsnL3SQdP7Dp830yvp2yQso4MOQ6l3kuYyUQslxhESnEzEQGVcVlDqMYRK4LXipTCpXHsgLgwKPYgNaqlENy2fduXfPRog922bSu-8FbAbE0wiituhT0qcI13jus7NbV68ztLHC7l2l7mbaTafcyre52LvoddHXxk588ggClDe-46Lnv2OYV3e_l_0u_ANJxfwI</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Hill, Lucas B.</creator><creator>Savoy, Julia N.</creator><creator>Austin, Ann E.</creator><creator>Bantawa, Bipana</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><author>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cooperative Programs</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoy, Julia N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, Lucas B.</au><au>Savoy, Julia N.</au><au>Austin, Ann E.</au><au>Bantawa, Bipana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1216790</ericid><atitle>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</atitle><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle><stitle>Innov High Educ</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>187-202</pages><issn>0742-5627</issn><eissn>1573-1758</eissn><abstract>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-5627
ispartof Innovative higher education, 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202
issn 0742-5627
1573-1758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2183929676
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ProQuest One Literature; ERIC
subjects College students
Cooperative Programs
Education
Education policy
Education reform
Educational Benefits
Educational Change
Higher Education
Learning
Mathematics
Preservice Teacher Education
Professional development
STEM Education
Student attitudes
Translation
Undergraduate Study
title The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Multi-Institutional%20STEM%20Reform%20Networks%20on%20Member%20Institutions:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20CIRTL&rft.jtitle=Innovative%20higher%20education&rft.au=Hill,%20Lucas%20B.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=187-202&rft.issn=0742-5627&rft.eissn=1573-1758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183929676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183929676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1216790&rfr_iscdi=true