Loading…
The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL
Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This...
Saved in:
Published in: | Innovative higher education 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3 |
container_end_page | 202 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | Innovative higher education |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Hill, Lucas B. Savoy, Julia N. Austin, Ann E. Bantawa, Bipana |
description | Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2183929676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1216790</ericid><sourcerecordid>2183929676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8BzNJN1k401K1ZVWoV3PYT9mdWvbrUkW6b93y4p68TSH5513mIeQc-BXwLm-9sB1FDEOhpmRAqYPyAAiLRnoKD4kA65HgkVK6GNy4v2Scw4dGZAyfUOarLdZEWhT0Vm7CjVLNj7UoQ11s8lWdJFOZnSOVePW9AnDZ-PePW02dIbrHB39E_Y39JaOM490Edpyty8cJ_N0ekqOqmzl8ex7DsnL3SQdP7Dp830yvp2yQso4MOQ6l3kuYyUQslxhESnEzEQGVcVlDqMYRK4LXipTCpXHsgLgwKPYgNaqlENy2fduXfPRog922bSu-8FbAbE0wiituhT0qcI13jus7NbV68ztLHC7l2l7mbaTafcyre52LvoddHXxk588ggClDe-46Lnv2OYV3e_l_0u_ANJxfwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183929676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-5627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>College students ; Cooperative Programs ; Education ; Education policy ; Education reform ; Educational Benefits ; Educational Change ; Higher Education ; Learning ; Mathematics ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Professional development ; STEM Education ; Student attitudes ; Translation ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Innovative higher education, 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Innovative Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2183929676/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2183929676?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,62661,62662,62677,74068,74093,74269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1216790$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoy, Julia N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><title>Innovative higher education</title><addtitle>Innov High Educ</addtitle><description>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cooperative Programs</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0742-5627</issn><issn>1573-1758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8BzNJN1k401K1ZVWoV3PYT9mdWvbrUkW6b93y4p68TSH5513mIeQc-BXwLm-9sB1FDEOhpmRAqYPyAAiLRnoKD4kA65HgkVK6GNy4v2Scw4dGZAyfUOarLdZEWhT0Vm7CjVLNj7UoQ11s8lWdJFOZnSOVePW9AnDZ-PePW02dIbrHB39E_Y39JaOM490Edpyty8cJ_N0ekqOqmzl8ex7DsnL3SQdP7Dp830yvp2yQso4MOQ6l3kuYyUQslxhESnEzEQGVcVlDqMYRK4LXipTCpXHsgLgwKPYgNaqlENy2fduXfPRog922bSu-8FbAbE0wiituhT0qcI13jus7NbV68ztLHC7l2l7mbaTafcyre52LvoddHXxk588ggClDe-46Lnv2OYV3e_l_0u_ANJxfwI</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Hill, Lucas B.</creator><creator>Savoy, Julia N.</creator><creator>Austin, Ann E.</creator><creator>Bantawa, Bipana</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</title><author>Hill, Lucas B. ; Savoy, Julia N. ; Austin, Ann E. ; Bantawa, Bipana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cooperative Programs</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoy, Julia N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bantawa, Bipana</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, Lucas B.</au><au>Savoy, Julia N.</au><au>Austin, Ann E.</au><au>Bantawa, Bipana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1216790</ericid><atitle>The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL</atitle><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle><stitle>Innov High Educ</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>187-202</pages><issn>0742-5627</issn><eissn>1573-1758</eissn><abstract>Multi-institutional networks have become an increasingly common change mechanism in higher education, especially in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education reform. However, little is known about the impact of such networks on participating institutions. This study examined one network, the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), to understand the multi-level impact of network membership on participating campuses. Framed by CIRTL’s mission to prepare future STEM faculty, results showed that the Network provided four major benefits for member institutions, which were translated and used to expand and modify local teaching professional development programs, subsequently impacting program participants and campus perceptions of graduate student professional development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0742-5627 |
ispartof | Innovative higher education, 2019-06, Vol.44 (3), p.187-202 |
issn | 0742-5627 1573-1758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2183929676 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ProQuest One Literature; ERIC |
subjects | College students Cooperative Programs Education Education policy Education reform Educational Benefits Educational Change Higher Education Learning Mathematics Preservice Teacher Education Professional development STEM Education Student attitudes Translation Undergraduate Study |
title | The Impact of Multi-Institutional STEM Reform Networks on Member Institutions: A Case Study of CIRTL |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Multi-Institutional%20STEM%20Reform%20Networks%20on%20Member%20Institutions:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20CIRTL&rft.jtitle=Innovative%20higher%20education&rft.au=Hill,%20Lucas%20B.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=187-202&rft.issn=0742-5627&rft.eissn=1573-1758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183929676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e07b3bb3862e1ab6ec56eea959e6f03b14812b7c0d69d26b83f110105891776d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183929676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1216790&rfr_iscdi=true |