Loading…
School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy
The goal of school/university partnerships is the simultaneous renewal of colleges of education and of K-12 schools. In theory, this improvement comes about as university and K-12 faculty members work together to mentor preservice teachers in the best possible environment. Ideally, as they participa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Phi Delta Kappan 2004-05, Vol.85 (9), p.703-707 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-d5ac1fc372ddcd5944630c7345af3d5a6ec2b63f799564c4776c46d52d504273 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 707 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 703 |
container_title | Phi Delta Kappan |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Stephens, Diane Boldt, Gail |
description | The goal of school/university partnerships is the simultaneous renewal of colleges of education and of K-12 schools. In theory, this improvement comes about as university and K-12 faculty members work together to mentor preservice teachers in the best possible environment. Ideally, as they participate in these collaborations, the faculty groups do a better job together than either could accomplish alone, and both become better educators. However, achieving this goal is difficult. It is difficult because, until the collaboration has begun and problems arise, partners cannot know what particular challenges each partnership will face. This does not mean that partnerships are doomed. If all partners assume responsibility for the success of the partnership, the collaborations can succeed and teacher education can improve. The rhetoric of school/university partnerships is no doubt familiar to everyone. But the reality is another matter. And how to handle the intimate relationships between the people involved presents the hardest question to answer. The authors share their experiences, especially with this question. Most K-12 and university faculties want education to improve. What is needed need from administrators and ourselves is a commitment to moving beyond the rhetoric to the reality and the intimacy that are necessary for school/university partnerships to survive and to thrive. Establishing the conditions for long-term relationships will lead to a better future for our children and for our profession. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/003172170408500912 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218469899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A116362448</galeid><ericid>EJ703115</ericid><jstor_id>20189412</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_003172170408500912</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A116362448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-d5ac1fc372ddcd5944630c7345af3d5a6ec2b63f799564c4776c46d52d504273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2LEzEYhYMoWFf_gCgM3gk72ySTj4k3spa1Vooru-t1iJlMmzI76SapbP_9vmWkWiyy5CIh5zknhPcg9JrgM0KkHGNcEUmJxAzXHGNF6BM0IorhUrBaPkWjHVDuiOfoRUorjDEhmI3Qx2u7DKEb_-j9LxeTz9viu4m5h_PSr9OH4mrpcojenhZXznSgnxamb4pZn_2tsduX6FlruuRe_d5P0M3ni5vJl3J-OZ1Nzuel5UrlsuHGktZWkjaNbbhiTFTYyopx01YgCmfpT1G1UikumGVSCstEw2nDMaOyOkHvhth1DHcbl7JehU3s4UVNSc2EqpUCqByghemc9n0bcjR24eAzpgu9az1cnxMiKkEZq_-EHvB27e_039DZEQhW4269PZr6_sAATHb3eWE2KenZ9bfHs5-mj2br6fyQLY-xNnSdWzgNk5lcHvJ04G0MKUXX6nWE8catJljvCqb_LRiY3gwmB_XYGy6-SkAJB3k8yMnAk_tx_Tfw7eBYJajcPpFiUisG-gN14NsT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218469899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Stephens, Diane ; Boldt, Gail</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Diane ; Boldt, Gail</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of school/university partnerships is the simultaneous renewal of colleges of education and of K-12 schools. In theory, this improvement comes about as university and K-12 faculty members work together to mentor preservice teachers in the best possible environment. Ideally, as they participate in these collaborations, the faculty groups do a better job together than either could accomplish alone, and both become better educators. However, achieving this goal is difficult. It is difficult because, until the collaboration has begun and problems arise, partners cannot know what particular challenges each partnership will face. This does not mean that partnerships are doomed. If all partners assume responsibility for the success of the partnership, the collaborations can succeed and teacher education can improve. The rhetoric of school/university partnerships is no doubt familiar to everyone. But the reality is another matter. And how to handle the intimate relationships between the people involved presents the hardest question to answer. The authors share their experiences, especially with this question. Most K-12 and university faculties want education to improve. What is needed need from administrators and ourselves is a commitment to moving beyond the rhetoric to the reality and the intimacy that are necessary for school/university partnerships to survive and to thrive. Establishing the conditions for long-term relationships will lead to a better future for our children and for our profession.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/003172170408500912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Phi Delta Kappa Inc</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; College Faculty ; College School Cooperation ; Colleges & universities ; Collegiality ; Company joint venture ; Educational aspects ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Hawaii ; Higher Education ; Intimacy ; Joint ventures ; Learning ; Partnerships ; Partnerships in Education ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Preservice Teachers ; Professional relationships ; Rhetoric ; School age children ; School faculty ; School/University Partnerships ; Schools ; Schools of education ; Teacher Collaboration ; Teacher education ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher Role ; Teachers ; Teamwork ; United States ; Universities ; Universities and colleges</subject><ispartof>Phi Delta Kappan, 2004-05, Vol.85 (9), p.703-707</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Phi Delta Kappa International, Inc.</rights><rights>2004 Phi Delta Kappa</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Phi Delta Kappa May 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-d5ac1fc372ddcd5944630c7345af3d5a6ec2b63f799564c4776c46d52d504273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20189412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/218469899?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21369,21385,27915,27916,33602,33868,43724,43871,58229,58462,62650,62651,62666,79125</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ703115$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldt, Gail</creatorcontrib><title>School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy</title><title>Phi Delta Kappan</title><addtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</addtitle><description>The goal of school/university partnerships is the simultaneous renewal of colleges of education and of K-12 schools. In theory, this improvement comes about as university and K-12 faculty members work together to mentor preservice teachers in the best possible environment. Ideally, as they participate in these collaborations, the faculty groups do a better job together than either could accomplish alone, and both become better educators. However, achieving this goal is difficult. It is difficult because, until the collaboration has begun and problems arise, partners cannot know what particular challenges each partnership will face. This does not mean that partnerships are doomed. If all partners assume responsibility for the success of the partnership, the collaborations can succeed and teacher education can improve. The rhetoric of school/university partnerships is no doubt familiar to everyone. But the reality is another matter. And how to handle the intimate relationships between the people involved presents the hardest question to answer. The authors share their experiences, especially with this question. Most K-12 and university faculties want education to improve. What is needed need from administrators and ourselves is a commitment to moving beyond the rhetoric to the reality and the intimacy that are necessary for school/university partnerships to survive and to thrive. Establishing the conditions for long-term relationships will lead to a better future for our children and for our profession.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College School Cooperation</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Collegiality</subject><subject>Company joint venture</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Hawaii</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Joint ventures</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>School age children</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>School/University Partnerships</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Schools of education</subject><subject>Teacher Collaboration</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Universities and colleges</subject><issn>0031-7217</issn><issn>1940-6487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2LEzEYhYMoWFf_gCgM3gk72ySTj4k3spa1Vooru-t1iJlMmzI76SapbP_9vmWkWiyy5CIh5zknhPcg9JrgM0KkHGNcEUmJxAzXHGNF6BM0IorhUrBaPkWjHVDuiOfoRUorjDEhmI3Qx2u7DKEb_-j9LxeTz9viu4m5h_PSr9OH4mrpcojenhZXznSgnxamb4pZn_2tsduX6FlruuRe_d5P0M3ni5vJl3J-OZ1Nzuel5UrlsuHGktZWkjaNbbhiTFTYyopx01YgCmfpT1G1UikumGVSCstEw2nDMaOyOkHvhth1DHcbl7JehU3s4UVNSc2EqpUCqByghemc9n0bcjR24eAzpgu9az1cnxMiKkEZq_-EHvB27e_039DZEQhW4269PZr6_sAATHb3eWE2KenZ9bfHs5-mj2br6fyQLY-xNnSdWzgNk5lcHvJ04G0MKUXX6nWE8catJljvCqb_LRiY3gwmB_XYGy6-SkAJB3k8yMnAk_tx_Tfw7eBYJajcPpFiUisG-gN14NsT</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Stephens, Diane</creator><creator>Boldt, Gail</creator><general>Phi Delta Kappa Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa International, Inc</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>7XI</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy</title><author>Stephens, Diane ; Boldt, Gail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-d5ac1fc372ddcd5944630c7345af3d5a6ec2b63f799564c4776c46d52d504273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College School Cooperation</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Collegiality</topic><topic>Company joint venture</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Hawaii</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Joint ventures</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>School age children</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>School/University Partnerships</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Schools of education</topic><topic>Teacher Collaboration</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Universities and colleges</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldt, Gail</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Biography In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Teacher Journals</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephens, Diane</au><au>Boldt, Gail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ703115</ericid><atitle>School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy</atitle><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle><addtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>707</epage><pages>703-707</pages><issn>0031-7217</issn><eissn>1940-6487</eissn><abstract>The goal of school/university partnerships is the simultaneous renewal of colleges of education and of K-12 schools. In theory, this improvement comes about as university and K-12 faculty members work together to mentor preservice teachers in the best possible environment. Ideally, as they participate in these collaborations, the faculty groups do a better job together than either could accomplish alone, and both become better educators. However, achieving this goal is difficult. It is difficult because, until the collaboration has begun and problems arise, partners cannot know what particular challenges each partnership will face. This does not mean that partnerships are doomed. If all partners assume responsibility for the success of the partnership, the collaborations can succeed and teacher education can improve. The rhetoric of school/university partnerships is no doubt familiar to everyone. But the reality is another matter. And how to handle the intimate relationships between the people involved presents the hardest question to answer. The authors share their experiences, especially with this question. Most K-12 and university faculties want education to improve. What is needed need from administrators and ourselves is a commitment to moving beyond the rhetoric to the reality and the intimacy that are necessary for school/university partnerships to survive and to thrive. Establishing the conditions for long-term relationships will lead to a better future for our children and for our profession.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Phi Delta Kappa Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/003172170408500912</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-7217 |
ispartof | Phi Delta Kappan, 2004-05, Vol.85 (9), p.703-707 |
issn | 0031-7217 1940-6487 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218469899 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Sage Journals Online; Education Collection |
subjects | Collaboration College Faculty College School Cooperation Colleges & universities Collegiality Company joint venture Educational aspects Elementary School Teachers Elementary Secondary Education Hawaii Higher Education Intimacy Joint ventures Learning Partnerships Partnerships in Education Preservice Teacher Education Preservice Teachers Professional relationships Rhetoric School age children School faculty School/University Partnerships Schools Schools of education Teacher Collaboration Teacher education Teacher Educators Teacher Role Teachers Teamwork United States Universities Universities and colleges |
title | School/University Partnerships: Rhetoric, Reality, and Intimacy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School/University%20Partnerships:%20Rhetoric,%20Reality,%20and%20Intimacy&rft.jtitle=Phi%20Delta%20Kappan&rft.au=Stephens,%20Diane&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=707&rft.pages=703-707&rft.issn=0031-7217&rft.eissn=1940-6487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/003172170408500912&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA116362448%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-d5ac1fc372ddcd5944630c7345af3d5a6ec2b63f799564c4776c46d52d504273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218469899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A116362448&rft_ericid=EJ703115&rft_jstor_id=20189412&rft_sage_id=10.1177_003172170408500912&rfr_iscdi=true |