Loading…

From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction

Since the 1940s Harold Garfinkel developed ethnomethodology as a distinctive sociological attitude. This sociological attitude turns the focus of the analysis of interaction to the actor's perspective. It suggests that interaction is ongoingly produced through actions that are organized in a re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human studies 2019-09, Vol.42 (2), p.305-326
Main Author: vom Lehn, Dirk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823
container_end_page 326
container_issue 2
container_start_page 305
container_title Human studies
container_volume 42
creator vom Lehn, Dirk
description Since the 1940s Harold Garfinkel developed ethnomethodology as a distinctive sociological attitude. This sociological attitude turns the focus of the analysis of interaction to the actor's perspective. It suggests that interaction is ongoingly produced through actions that are organized in a retrospective and prospective fashion. The ethnomethodological analysis of interaction therefore investigates how actors produce their actions in light of their analysis of immediately prior actions and in anticipation of possible next actions. Ethnomethodologists describe the relationship of actions emerging from this analysis as "sequential". This article discusses how Garfinkel's description of practical action as "experiment in miniature" can be seen as a precursor to the concept of "sequentially" that defines today's ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Having discussed the intellectual background to ethnomethodology the article briefly explores two fragments of interaction audio-/video-recorded in a museum and an optometric consultation to illustrate the key concerns of this kind of analysis. The article closes with a short reflection on current developments in ethnomethodology and their relationship to sociology.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10746-019-09496-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2186610956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45216662</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45216662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsIdQp4ItjJxmrqi2VilhAYsIyyaVNSe1iuxL99xiCBBPT3fC-d_ceIZfAboCx_NYDyzOZMCgTVmalTMQRGYDI06QQ8HxMBgwkj3tWnJIz7zeMsazkxYC8zJzd0rl2TWvesBt5Opp-7NC1WzTB09bQ-9a0OuwdjmiwNKyRTsPa2C2Gta1tZ1dtpTs6Nro7-NZT29CFCeh0FVprzslJozuPFz9zSJ5m08fJXbJ8mC8m42VS8ZKHpBQaoMxzDVkuQBZYS4EFSp43tZac1XWMggXgayYQaoacg8YGKhb1WKR8SK56352z73v0QW3s3sWfvEqhkBJYKWRUpb2qctZ7h43axaDaHRQw9dWj6ntUsUf13aMSEeI95KPYrND9Wv9LXffUxgfr_t5JeSQykYKUMuWfuP6BbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2186610956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>vom Lehn, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>vom Lehn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Since the 1940s Harold Garfinkel developed ethnomethodology as a distinctive sociological attitude. This sociological attitude turns the focus of the analysis of interaction to the actor's perspective. It suggests that interaction is ongoingly produced through actions that are organized in a retrospective and prospective fashion. The ethnomethodological analysis of interaction therefore investigates how actors produce their actions in light of their analysis of immediately prior actions and in anticipation of possible next actions. Ethnomethodologists describe the relationship of actions emerging from this analysis as "sequential". This article discusses how Garfinkel's description of practical action as "experiment in miniature" can be seen as a precursor to the concept of "sequentially" that defines today's ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Having discussed the intellectual background to ethnomethodology the article briefly explores two fragments of interaction audio-/video-recorded in a museum and an optometric consultation to illustrate the key concerns of this kind of analysis. The article closes with a short reflection on current developments in ethnomethodology and their relationship to sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-8548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-851X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10746-019-09496-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Action ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Education ; EMPIRICAL STUDY/ANALYSIS ; Ethnomethodology ; Fragments ; Garfinkel, Harold (1917-2011) ; Modern Philosophy ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of the Social Sciences ; Political Philosophy ; Social interaction ; Sociolinguistics ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Human studies, 2019-09, Vol.42 (2), p.305-326</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Human Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6778-0000</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2186610956/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2186610956?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12828,12842,21375,21376,27325,27905,27906,33204,33592,33755,34511,34756,43714,44096,44181,58219,58452,62640,62641,62656,73945,73970,74388,74477</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>vom Lehn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction</title><title>Human studies</title><addtitle>Hum Stud</addtitle><description>Since the 1940s Harold Garfinkel developed ethnomethodology as a distinctive sociological attitude. This sociological attitude turns the focus of the analysis of interaction to the actor's perspective. It suggests that interaction is ongoingly produced through actions that are organized in a retrospective and prospective fashion. The ethnomethodological analysis of interaction therefore investigates how actors produce their actions in light of their analysis of immediately prior actions and in anticipation of possible next actions. Ethnomethodologists describe the relationship of actions emerging from this analysis as "sequential". This article discusses how Garfinkel's description of practical action as "experiment in miniature" can be seen as a precursor to the concept of "sequentially" that defines today's ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Having discussed the intellectual background to ethnomethodology the article briefly explores two fragments of interaction audio-/video-recorded in a museum and an optometric consultation to illustrate the key concerns of this kind of analysis. The article closes with a short reflection on current developments in ethnomethodology and their relationship to sociology.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>EMPIRICAL STUDY/ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Ethnomethodology</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Garfinkel, Harold (1917-2011)</subject><subject>Modern Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0163-8548</issn><issn>1572-851X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsIdQp4ItjJxmrqi2VilhAYsIyyaVNSe1iuxL99xiCBBPT3fC-d_ceIZfAboCx_NYDyzOZMCgTVmalTMQRGYDI06QQ8HxMBgwkj3tWnJIz7zeMsazkxYC8zJzd0rl2TWvesBt5Opp-7NC1WzTB09bQ-9a0OuwdjmiwNKyRTsPa2C2Gta1tZ1dtpTs6Nro7-NZT29CFCeh0FVprzslJozuPFz9zSJ5m08fJXbJ8mC8m42VS8ZKHpBQaoMxzDVkuQBZYS4EFSp43tZac1XWMggXgayYQaoacg8YGKhb1WKR8SK56352z73v0QW3s3sWfvEqhkBJYKWRUpb2qctZ7h43axaDaHRQw9dWj6ntUsUf13aMSEeI95KPYrND9Wv9LXffUxgfr_t5JeSQykYKUMuWfuP6BbQ</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>vom Lehn, Dirk</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-0000</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction</title><author>vom Lehn, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>EMPIRICAL STUDY/ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Ethnomethodology</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Garfinkel, Harold (1917-2011)</topic><topic>Modern Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>vom Lehn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>vom Lehn, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction</atitle><jtitle>Human studies</jtitle><stitle>Hum Stud</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>305-326</pages><issn>0163-8548</issn><eissn>1572-851X</eissn><abstract>Since the 1940s Harold Garfinkel developed ethnomethodology as a distinctive sociological attitude. This sociological attitude turns the focus of the analysis of interaction to the actor's perspective. It suggests that interaction is ongoingly produced through actions that are organized in a retrospective and prospective fashion. The ethnomethodological analysis of interaction therefore investigates how actors produce their actions in light of their analysis of immediately prior actions and in anticipation of possible next actions. Ethnomethodologists describe the relationship of actions emerging from this analysis as "sequential". This article discusses how Garfinkel's description of practical action as "experiment in miniature" can be seen as a precursor to the concept of "sequentially" that defines today's ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Having discussed the intellectual background to ethnomethodology the article briefly explores two fragments of interaction audio-/video-recorded in a museum and an optometric consultation to illustrate the key concerns of this kind of analysis. The article closes with a short reflection on current developments in ethnomethodology and their relationship to sociology.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10746-019-09496-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-0000</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-8548
ispartof Human studies, 2019-09, Vol.42 (2), p.305-326
issn 0163-8548
1572-851X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2186610956
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Sociology Collection; ProQuest One Literature; Sociological Abstracts; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Action
Analysis
Attitudes
Behavior
Education
EMPIRICAL STUDY/ANALYSIS
Ethnomethodology
Fragments
Garfinkel, Harold (1917-2011)
Modern Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Political Philosophy
Social interaction
Sociolinguistics
Sociology
title From Garfinkel's 'Experiments in Miniature' to the Ethnomethodological Analysis of Interaction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Garfinkel's%20'Experiments%20in%20Miniature'%20to%20the%20Ethnomethodological%20Analysis%20of%20Interaction&rft.jtitle=Human%20studies&rft.au=vom%20Lehn,%20Dirk&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=305-326&rft.issn=0163-8548&rft.eissn=1572-851X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10746-019-09496-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45216662%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-95a11977a1475168ed65e8e637fda630dd572e81eb45e1d0e331aef1c0475e823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186610956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45216662&rfr_iscdi=true