Loading…

Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage

Summary Life cycle thinking plays an important role in sustainable development in the building sector. However, the complexity of data collection and scope definition limits life cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Even if the inventory data have already been collected, tabulated, and indexed, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of industrial ecology 2019-02, Vol.23 (1), p.268-279
Main Authors: Tecchio, Paolo, Gregory, Jeremy, Olivetti, Elsa, Ghattas, Randa, Kirchain, Randolph
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3
container_end_page 279
container_issue 1
container_start_page 268
container_title Journal of industrial ecology
container_volume 23
creator Tecchio, Paolo
Gregory, Jeremy
Olivetti, Elsa
Ghattas, Randa
Kirchain, Randolph
description Summary Life cycle thinking plays an important role in sustainable development in the building sector. However, the complexity of data collection and scope definition limits life cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Even if the inventory data have already been collected, tabulated, and indexed, the method is still time‐consuming, which may be discouraging for designers. This study demonstrates how the LCA of buildings can be robustly streamlined using structured underspecification of impact data combined with an effective and efficient triage of the data collection. Tests were conducted with a series of building typologies that were analyzed with a cradle‐to‐gate approach. The probabilistic triage approach was tested to identify selected activities requiring detailed specification because they contribute most to total impact, thereby reducing data gathering effort. Impacts such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and smog creation were assessed, and results showed that 40% to 46% of the bill of materials components represent 75% of total impacts of single‐family houses and multifamily buildings. By specifying only a prioritized subset of the bill of materials to the highest level of specificity, results proved to be reasonably accurate and obtainable with less effort.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jiec.12731
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2186637578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2186637578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4QsssUNK8SMPe1miAkWVQGq7thx7UlylSbAToez4BL6RLyElrJnNncW5M9IJgmuCZ2SYu70FPSM0ZeQkmJCY4VBQgU-HHXMeEsHxeXDh_R5jwhKKJ0Gzbh2oQ2krW-1Q-wZoZQtAWa9LQHPvwfsDVC2qC3Tf2dIMlEd5j4Zap9vOgUHbyoD7_vxaN6BtYbVqbV0hVRn06upc5ba0vrUabZxVO7gMzgpVerj6y2mwfVhssqdw9fK4zOarUDOWklBTbYjQPGU4pRxHRCQqzSORF4wbEum40DnkBoRWSlAVa2M0jbgoBCQ04YpNg5vxbuPq9w58K_d156rhpaSEJwlL45QP1O1IaVd776CQjbMH5XpJsDwalUej8tfoAJMR_rAl9P-Q8nm5yMbOD6rTe1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2186637578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tecchio, Paolo ; Gregory, Jeremy ; Olivetti, Elsa ; Ghattas, Randa ; Kirchain, Randolph</creator><creatorcontrib>Tecchio, Paolo ; Gregory, Jeremy ; Olivetti, Elsa ; Ghattas, Randa ; Kirchain, Randolph</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Life cycle thinking plays an important role in sustainable development in the building sector. However, the complexity of data collection and scope definition limits life cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Even if the inventory data have already been collected, tabulated, and indexed, the method is still time‐consuming, which may be discouraging for designers. This study demonstrates how the LCA of buildings can be robustly streamlined using structured underspecification of impact data combined with an effective and efficient triage of the data collection. Tests were conducted with a series of building typologies that were analyzed with a cradle‐to‐gate approach. The probabilistic triage approach was tested to identify selected activities requiring detailed specification because they contribute most to total impact, thereby reducing data gathering effort. Impacts such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and smog creation were assessed, and results showed that 40% to 46% of the bill of materials components represent 75% of total impacts of single‐family houses and multifamily buildings. By specifying only a prioritized subset of the bill of materials to the highest level of specificity, results proved to be reasonably accurate and obtainable with less effort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-1980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Haven: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Buildings ; Climate change ; Data collection ; Eutrophication ; Global warming ; Houses ; Housing ; hybrid models ; industrial ecology ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; probabilistic triage ; Residential areas ; Smog ; Specification ; Specifications ; streamlined life cycle assessment ; Streamlining ; Sustainable development ; Triage ; uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of industrial ecology, 2019-02, Vol.23 (1), p.268-279</ispartof><rights>2018 by Yale University</rights><rights>2019, Yale University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4304-0945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tecchio, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivetti, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghattas, Randa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchain, Randolph</creatorcontrib><title>Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage</title><title>Journal of industrial ecology</title><description>Summary Life cycle thinking plays an important role in sustainable development in the building sector. However, the complexity of data collection and scope definition limits life cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Even if the inventory data have already been collected, tabulated, and indexed, the method is still time‐consuming, which may be discouraging for designers. This study demonstrates how the LCA of buildings can be robustly streamlined using structured underspecification of impact data combined with an effective and efficient triage of the data collection. Tests were conducted with a series of building typologies that were analyzed with a cradle‐to‐gate approach. The probabilistic triage approach was tested to identify selected activities requiring detailed specification because they contribute most to total impact, thereby reducing data gathering effort. Impacts such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and smog creation were assessed, and results showed that 40% to 46% of the bill of materials components represent 75% of total impacts of single‐family houses and multifamily buildings. By specifying only a prioritized subset of the bill of materials to the highest level of specificity, results proved to be reasonably accurate and obtainable with less effort.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>hybrid models</subject><subject>industrial ecology</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>probabilistic triage</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Smog</subject><subject>Specification</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>streamlined life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Streamlining</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><issn>1088-1980</issn><issn>1530-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4QsssUNK8SMPe1miAkWVQGq7thx7UlylSbAToez4BL6RLyElrJnNncW5M9IJgmuCZ2SYu70FPSM0ZeQkmJCY4VBQgU-HHXMeEsHxeXDh_R5jwhKKJ0Gzbh2oQ2krW-1Q-wZoZQtAWa9LQHPvwfsDVC2qC3Tf2dIMlEd5j4Zap9vOgUHbyoD7_vxaN6BtYbVqbV0hVRn06upc5ba0vrUabZxVO7gMzgpVerj6y2mwfVhssqdw9fK4zOarUDOWklBTbYjQPGU4pRxHRCQqzSORF4wbEum40DnkBoRWSlAVa2M0jbgoBCQ04YpNg5vxbuPq9w58K_d156rhpaSEJwlL45QP1O1IaVd776CQjbMH5XpJsDwalUej8tfoAJMR_rAl9P-Q8nm5yMbOD6rTe1g</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Tecchio, Paolo</creator><creator>Gregory, Jeremy</creator><creator>Olivetti, Elsa</creator><creator>Ghattas, Randa</creator><creator>Kirchain, Randolph</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-0945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage</title><author>Tecchio, Paolo ; Gregory, Jeremy ; Olivetti, Elsa ; Ghattas, Randa ; Kirchain, Randolph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>hybrid models</topic><topic>industrial ecology</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>probabilistic triage</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Smog</topic><topic>Specification</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>streamlined life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Streamlining</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tecchio, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivetti, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghattas, Randa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchain, Randolph</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tecchio, Paolo</au><au>Gregory, Jeremy</au><au>Olivetti, Elsa</au><au>Ghattas, Randa</au><au>Kirchain, Randolph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>268-279</pages><issn>1088-1980</issn><eissn>1530-9290</eissn><abstract>Summary Life cycle thinking plays an important role in sustainable development in the building sector. However, the complexity of data collection and scope definition limits life cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Even if the inventory data have already been collected, tabulated, and indexed, the method is still time‐consuming, which may be discouraging for designers. This study demonstrates how the LCA of buildings can be robustly streamlined using structured underspecification of impact data combined with an effective and efficient triage of the data collection. Tests were conducted with a series of building typologies that were analyzed with a cradle‐to‐gate approach. The probabilistic triage approach was tested to identify selected activities requiring detailed specification because they contribute most to total impact, thereby reducing data gathering effort. Impacts such as global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and smog creation were assessed, and results showed that 40% to 46% of the bill of materials components represent 75% of total impacts of single‐family houses and multifamily buildings. By specifying only a prioritized subset of the bill of materials to the highest level of specificity, results proved to be reasonably accurate and obtainable with less effort.</abstract><cop>New Haven</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jiec.12731</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-0945</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-1980
ispartof Journal of industrial ecology, 2019-02, Vol.23 (1), p.268-279
issn 1088-1980
1530-9290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2186637578
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Acidification
Buildings
Climate change
Data collection
Eutrophication
Global warming
Houses
Housing
hybrid models
industrial ecology
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycles
probabilistic triage
Residential areas
Smog
Specification
Specifications
streamlined life cycle assessment
Streamlining
Sustainable development
Triage
uncertainty
title Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Streamlining%20the%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment%20of%20Buildings%20by%20Structured%20Under%E2%80%90Specification%20and%20Probabilistic%20Triage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20industrial%20ecology&rft.au=Tecchio,%20Paolo&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=268-279&rft.issn=1088-1980&rft.eissn=1530-9290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jiec.12731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2186637578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3371-c2cd19c873072804196a7b49bf38d14c5fcbebde9caa92a5cddc2489f9e6268a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186637578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true