Client Perceptions of the Impact of Genetic Counseling: An Exploratory Study

Twenty‐eight former genetic counseling clients seen at a major Midwestern university were recruited to be interviewed about their genetic counseling experiences, including most and least helpful aspects, what they learned, how this information impacted their decision‐making, and their perceptions of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of genetic counseling 1999-08, Vol.8 (4), p.191-216
Main Authors: Veach, Patricia McCarthy, Truesdell, Sarah E., LeRoy, Bonnie S., Bartels, Dianne M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitude
client perceptions
Counseling
Data Collection
Decision Making
Emotions
Genetic Counseling
Health Personnel
Humans
Mental Recall
Midwestern United States
Motivation
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Twenty‐eight former genetic counseling clients seen at a major Midwestern university were recruited to be interviewed about their genetic counseling experiences, including most and least helpful aspects, what they learned, how this information impacted their decision‐making, and their perceptions of their genetic counselors' behaviors. Responses were inductively analyzed, and several themes were identified, including: Clients sought genetic counseling to obtain genetic‐medical information; a majority accurately recalled this information; genetic counseling influenced decisions for about 50% of the sample; decision‐making was affected by several extra‐session factors; a majority experienced distress during the session; most perceived genetic counselor responses as nondirective and liked this approach; counselor behaviors regarded as directive involved discussion of pregnancy termination; participants disagreed about the need for and provision of genetic counselor support; most regarded the session as helpful and stated that they would seek genetic counseling again. Suggestions for addressing these issues in practice and research are given.
ISSN:1059-7700
1573-3599
DOI:10.1023/A:1022946431820