Loading…
COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS TASK ORDER BID PROTEST JURISDICTION AND EXPECTATION DAMAGES: THE 2009 MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE "GILBERT A. CUNEO" GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION
Before the Court is a unique, consolidated case. Plaintiff, Austen Technologies Inc, has initiated a bid protest challenging the award of task order. The Court is accustomed to hearing protests of garden-variety government contract awards. Yet this Court has not previously encountered a protest agai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public contract law journal 2009-06, Vol.38 (4), p.975-1057 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Before the Court is a unique, consolidated case. Plaintiff, Austen Technologies Inc, has initiated a bid protest challenging the award of task order. The Court is accustomed to hearing protests of garden-variety government contract awards. Yet this Court has not previously encountered a protest against a task order awarded under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ or umbrella) contract when the scope, period, or maximum value of the ID/IQ contract was not at issue. Adding to the uniqueness of the case is Austen's breach-of-contract claim. For the reason set in this article, the court denies Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, grants Plaintiff's Motion for a Permanent Injunction, and grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In this article, a memorandum is designed to supply you with the relevant information considered in drafting the competition problem, as well as to introduce the major arguments that competitors are likely to make. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-3441 2162-8181 |