Loading…

COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS TASK ORDER BID PROTEST JURISDICTION AND EXPECTATION DAMAGES: THE 2009 MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE "GILBERT A. CUNEO" GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION

Before the Court is a unique, consolidated case. Plaintiff, Austen Technologies Inc, has initiated a bid protest challenging the award of task order. The Court is accustomed to hearing protests of garden-variety government contract awards. Yet this Court has not previously encountered a protest agai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public contract law journal 2009-06, Vol.38 (4), p.975-1057
Main Authors: Chow, Matthew, Ward, Tara L., Bryan, Amy, Richard, Theodore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Before the Court is a unique, consolidated case. Plaintiff, Austen Technologies Inc, has initiated a bid protest challenging the award of task order. The Court is accustomed to hearing protests of garden-variety government contract awards. Yet this Court has not previously encountered a protest against a task order awarded under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ or umbrella) contract when the scope, period, or maximum value of the ID/IQ contract was not at issue. Adding to the uniqueness of the case is Austen's breach-of-contract claim. For the reason set in this article, the court denies Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, grants Plaintiff's Motion for a Permanent Injunction, and grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In this article, a memorandum is designed to supply you with the relevant information considered in drafting the competition problem, as well as to introduce the major arguments that competitors are likely to make.
ISSN:0033-3441
2162-8181