Loading…

Leaving Public Education Behind

The scheme uses achievement gaps to label schools as "failures," without providing the resources or support needed to eliminate them and includes an unfunded mandate that, by 2014, 100 percent of all students, including special education students and English-language learners, must be prof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radical teacher (Cambridge) 2004-03 (68), p.32
Main Author: Karp, Stanley
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 68
container_start_page 32
container_title Radical teacher (Cambridge)
container_volume
creator Karp, Stanley
description The scheme uses achievement gaps to label schools as "failures," without providing the resources or support needed to eliminate them and includes an unfunded mandate that, by 2014, 100 percent of all students, including special education students and English-language learners, must be proficient on state tests. Assessing the effectiveness of a particular school or education program requires multiple measures of academic performance including classroom observations and dialogue with real teachers and students, as well as a range of indicators from attendance and drop-out rates to graduation rates and post-graduation success, measures of teacher preparation and quality, surveys of parent participation and satisfaction and similar evaluations. [...]if the goal is a political one--to posture about "getting tough," to drive multicultural curriculum reforms, equity concerns, and more pluralistic, bottom-up approaches to school reform out of the system, or to create a widespread general perception of school failure that can be used to justify "breaking up the public school monopoly"--then over-reliance on standardized testing may do just fine. [...]while inequality in test scores is one indicator of school performance, test scores also reflect other inequalities that persist in the larger society and in schools themselves. [...]combining rhetorical concern for the victims of inequality with policies that perpetuate it may be an operative definition of "compassionate conservatism."
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218830027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>915334891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2188300273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DWwMDZiYeA0MLQ01DWxMDHnYOAqLs4yMDCwsLCw5GSQ90lNLMvMS1cIKE3KyUxWcE0pTU4syczPU3BKzcjMS-FhYE1LzClO5YXS3AxKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjQwsLYwMDI3NjohQBABOSLTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218830027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leaving Public Education Behind</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>ProQuest - social science premium collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Education Collection</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Karp, Stanley</creator><creatorcontrib>Karp, Stanley</creatorcontrib><description>The scheme uses achievement gaps to label schools as "failures," without providing the resources or support needed to eliminate them and includes an unfunded mandate that, by 2014, 100 percent of all students, including special education students and English-language learners, must be proficient on state tests. Assessing the effectiveness of a particular school or education program requires multiple measures of academic performance including classroom observations and dialogue with real teachers and students, as well as a range of indicators from attendance and drop-out rates to graduation rates and post-graduation success, measures of teacher preparation and quality, surveys of parent participation and satisfaction and similar evaluations. [...]if the goal is a political one--to posture about "getting tough," to drive multicultural curriculum reforms, equity concerns, and more pluralistic, bottom-up approaches to school reform out of the system, or to create a widespread general perception of school failure that can be used to justify "breaking up the public school monopoly"--then over-reliance on standardized testing may do just fine. [...]while inequality in test scores is one indicator of school performance, test scores also reflect other inequalities that persist in the larger society and in schools themselves. [...]combining rhetorical concern for the victims of inequality with policies that perpetuate it may be an operative definition of "compassionate conservatism."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-4847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn: Center for Critical Education of NY</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Achievement tests ; Charter schools ; Education ; Educational Change ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Educational Quality ; Educational Strategies ; English as a second language learning ; Federal government ; Government ; Multicultural Education ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Nontraditional Education ; Parent Participation ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Politics ; Public schools ; School systems ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Society ; Special education ; Standardized Tests ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Radical teacher (Cambridge), 2004-03 (68), p.32</ispartof><rights>Copyright Radical Teacher Mar 31, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/218830027?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12842,21359,21375,33592,33858,34756,43714,43861,44181,62640,62641,62656</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karp, Stanley</creatorcontrib><title>Leaving Public Education Behind</title><title>Radical teacher (Cambridge)</title><description>The scheme uses achievement gaps to label schools as "failures," without providing the resources or support needed to eliminate them and includes an unfunded mandate that, by 2014, 100 percent of all students, including special education students and English-language learners, must be proficient on state tests. Assessing the effectiveness of a particular school or education program requires multiple measures of academic performance including classroom observations and dialogue with real teachers and students, as well as a range of indicators from attendance and drop-out rates to graduation rates and post-graduation success, measures of teacher preparation and quality, surveys of parent participation and satisfaction and similar evaluations. [...]if the goal is a political one--to posture about "getting tough," to drive multicultural curriculum reforms, equity concerns, and more pluralistic, bottom-up approaches to school reform out of the system, or to create a widespread general perception of school failure that can be used to justify "breaking up the public school monopoly"--then over-reliance on standardized testing may do just fine. [...]while inequality in test scores is one indicator of school performance, test scores also reflect other inequalities that persist in the larger society and in schools themselves. [...]combining rhetorical concern for the victims of inequality with policies that perpetuate it may be an operative definition of "compassionate conservatism."</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Achievement tests</subject><subject>Charter schools</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Multicultural Education</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Nontraditional Education</subject><subject>Parent Participation</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>School systems</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0191-4847</issn><issn>1941-0832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DWwMDZiYeA0MLQ01DWxMDHnYOAqLs4yMDCwsLCw5GSQ90lNLMvMS1cIKE3KyUxWcE0pTU4syczPU3BKzcjMS-FhYE1LzClO5YXS3AxKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRXlAqXgjQwsLYwMDI3NjohQBABOSLTo</recordid><startdate>20040331</startdate><enddate>20040331</enddate><creator>Karp, Stanley</creator><general>Center for Critical Education of NY</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040331</creationdate><title>Leaving Public Education Behind</title><author>Karp, Stanley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2188300273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Achievement tests</topic><topic>Charter schools</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Multicultural Education</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Nontraditional Education</topic><topic>Parent Participation</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>School systems</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karp, Stanley</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest - social science premium collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Alt PressWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Radical teacher (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karp, Stanley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leaving Public Education Behind</atitle><jtitle>Radical teacher (Cambridge)</jtitle><date>2004-03-31</date><risdate>2004</risdate><issue>68</issue><spage>32</spage><pages>32-</pages><issn>0191-4847</issn><eissn>1941-0832</eissn><abstract>The scheme uses achievement gaps to label schools as "failures," without providing the resources or support needed to eliminate them and includes an unfunded mandate that, by 2014, 100 percent of all students, including special education students and English-language learners, must be proficient on state tests. Assessing the effectiveness of a particular school or education program requires multiple measures of academic performance including classroom observations and dialogue with real teachers and students, as well as a range of indicators from attendance and drop-out rates to graduation rates and post-graduation success, measures of teacher preparation and quality, surveys of parent participation and satisfaction and similar evaluations. [...]if the goal is a political one--to posture about "getting tough," to drive multicultural curriculum reforms, equity concerns, and more pluralistic, bottom-up approaches to school reform out of the system, or to create a widespread general perception of school failure that can be used to justify "breaking up the public school monopoly"--then over-reliance on standardized testing may do just fine. [...]while inequality in test scores is one indicator of school performance, test scores also reflect other inequalities that persist in the larger society and in schools themselves. [...]combining rhetorical concern for the victims of inequality with policies that perpetuate it may be an operative definition of "compassionate conservatism."</abstract><cop>Brooklyn</cop><pub>Center for Critical Education of NY</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-4847
ispartof Radical teacher (Cambridge), 2004-03 (68), p.32
issn 0191-4847
1941-0832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218830027
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; ProQuest - social science premium collection; ProQuest One Literature; JSTOR; Education Collection; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Academic achievement
Achievement tests
Charter schools
Education
Educational Change
Educational Facilities Improvement
Educational Quality
Educational Strategies
English as a second language learning
Federal government
Government
Multicultural Education
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Nontraditional Education
Parent Participation
Parents & parenting
Politics
Public schools
School systems
Social conditions & trends
Society
Special education
Standardized Tests
Teachers
title Leaving Public Education Behind
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A02%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leaving%20Public%20Education%20Behind&rft.jtitle=Radical%20teacher%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=Karp,%20Stanley&rft.date=2004-03-31&rft.issue=68&rft.spage=32&rft.pages=32-&rft.issn=0191-4847&rft.eissn=1941-0832&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E915334891%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2188300273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218830027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true