Loading…

Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space

While researchers in social psychology often explore space and time in isolation, the relations between these dimensions are rarely considered. To address this gap, we explore a model of Time–Space Distanciation, the extent to space and time are abstracted from one another in the cultural coordinati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Time & society 2019-02, Vol.28 (1), p.297-332
Main Authors: Keefer, Lucas A, Stewart, Sheridan A, Palitsky, Roman, Sullivan, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443
container_end_page 332
container_issue 1
container_start_page 297
container_title Time & society
container_volume 28
creator Keefer, Lucas A
Stewart, Sheridan A
Palitsky, Roman
Sullivan, Daniel
description While researchers in social psychology often explore space and time in isolation, the relations between these dimensions are rarely considered. To address this gap, we explore a model of Time–Space Distanciation, the extent to space and time are abstracted from one another in the cultural coordination of activity. We introduce this construct with an emphasis on its interdisciplinary roots and its status as a feature of both group- and individual-level psychology. We then offer three studies providing initial evidence of the distinctiveness of this variable at both levels. We find that (1) state-level time–space distanciation is related to, but distinct from, collectivism and cultural tightness and (2) it has important implications for collective well-being. We further found that (3) individual-level time–space distanciation is associated with a wide range of trait differences. We conclude by describing the implications of this research for the study of time, space, and their connection.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0961463X17716736
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2188566851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0961463X17716736</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2188566851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgMM7eZcB1NekjbdwNgzrCgJsR3JU0vZmJtk1NUrU7_8E_9EvMOIIguLqvc-7hHIROKTmnNM8vCGc0ZclD6CnLE3aAJmGmUR6Wh2iyO0e7-zGaOacrQtI455xmE_S21i18vn-4XkjAtXZedFILr013iecdhrbXVkvRNCN2Q98b66HGuvOwsQH1AlhZ0cKrsU9YGYv9FrAcGj9Y0eDejXJrGrMZsVHYByUsuhp_a52gIyUaB7OfOkX311frxTJa3d3cLuarSCaE-yitiiop4gJqpQiDimRUslgKLlKeihzSJIurpGYsWOeC1pLnMVMhhLqQwWaaTNHZ_m9vzfMAzpePZrBdkCxjWhQZY0VGA4rsUdIa5yyosre6FXYsKSl3EZd_Iw6UaE9xYgO_T__FfwF_un5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188566851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Keefer, Lucas A ; Stewart, Sheridan A ; Palitsky, Roman ; Sullivan, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Keefer, Lucas A ; Stewart, Sheridan A ; Palitsky, Roman ; Sullivan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>While researchers in social psychology often explore space and time in isolation, the relations between these dimensions are rarely considered. To address this gap, we explore a model of Time–Space Distanciation, the extent to space and time are abstracted from one another in the cultural coordination of activity. We introduce this construct with an emphasis on its interdisciplinary roots and its status as a feature of both group- and individual-level psychology. We then offer three studies providing initial evidence of the distinctiveness of this variable at both levels. We find that (1) state-level time–space distanciation is related to, but distinct from, collectivism and cultural tightness and (2) it has important implications for collective well-being. We further found that (3) individual-level time–space distanciation is associated with a wide range of trait differences. We conclude by describing the implications of this research for the study of time, space, and their connection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-463X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0961463X17716736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Collectivism ; Coordination ; Cross-cultural psychology ; Distinctiveness ; Individual differences ; Individual psychology ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Social isolation ; Social psychology ; Time use ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Time &amp; society, 2019-02, Vol.28 (1), p.297-332</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773,79235</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keefer, Lucas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Sheridan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palitsky, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space</title><title>Time &amp; society</title><description>While researchers in social psychology often explore space and time in isolation, the relations between these dimensions are rarely considered. To address this gap, we explore a model of Time–Space Distanciation, the extent to space and time are abstracted from one another in the cultural coordination of activity. We introduce this construct with an emphasis on its interdisciplinary roots and its status as a feature of both group- and individual-level psychology. We then offer three studies providing initial evidence of the distinctiveness of this variable at both levels. We find that (1) state-level time–space distanciation is related to, but distinct from, collectivism and cultural tightness and (2) it has important implications for collective well-being. We further found that (3) individual-level time–space distanciation is associated with a wide range of trait differences. We conclude by describing the implications of this research for the study of time, space, and their connection.</description><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Cross-cultural psychology</subject><subject>Distinctiveness</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Individual psychology</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Social isolation</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Time use</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0961-463X</issn><issn>1461-7463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaLgMM7eZcB1NekjbdwNgzrCgJsR3JU0vZmJtk1NUrU7_8E_9EvMOIIguLqvc-7hHIROKTmnNM8vCGc0ZclD6CnLE3aAJmGmUR6Wh2iyO0e7-zGaOacrQtI455xmE_S21i18vn-4XkjAtXZedFILr013iecdhrbXVkvRNCN2Q98b66HGuvOwsQH1AlhZ0cKrsU9YGYv9FrAcGj9Y0eDejXJrGrMZsVHYByUsuhp_a52gIyUaB7OfOkX311frxTJa3d3cLuarSCaE-yitiiop4gJqpQiDimRUslgKLlKeihzSJIurpGYsWOeC1pLnMVMhhLqQwWaaTNHZ_m9vzfMAzpePZrBdkCxjWhQZY0VGA4rsUdIa5yyosre6FXYsKSl3EZd_Iw6UaE9xYgO_T__FfwF_un5g</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Keefer, Lucas A</creator><creator>Stewart, Sheridan A</creator><creator>Palitsky, Roman</creator><creator>Sullivan, Daniel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space</title><author>Keefer, Lucas A ; Stewart, Sheridan A ; Palitsky, Roman ; Sullivan, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Cross-cultural psychology</topic><topic>Distinctiveness</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Individual psychology</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Social isolation</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Time use</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keefer, Lucas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Sheridan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palitsky, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Time &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keefer, Lucas A</au><au>Stewart, Sheridan A</au><au>Palitsky, Roman</au><au>Sullivan, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space</atitle><jtitle>Time &amp; society</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>297-332</pages><issn>0961-463X</issn><eissn>1461-7463</eissn><abstract>While researchers in social psychology often explore space and time in isolation, the relations between these dimensions are rarely considered. To address this gap, we explore a model of Time–Space Distanciation, the extent to space and time are abstracted from one another in the cultural coordination of activity. We introduce this construct with an emphasis on its interdisciplinary roots and its status as a feature of both group- and individual-level psychology. We then offer three studies providing initial evidence of the distinctiveness of this variable at both levels. We find that (1) state-level time–space distanciation is related to, but distinct from, collectivism and cultural tightness and (2) it has important implications for collective well-being. We further found that (3) individual-level time–space distanciation is associated with a wide range of trait differences. We conclude by describing the implications of this research for the study of time, space, and their connection.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0961463X17716736</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-463X
ispartof Time & society, 2019-02, Vol.28 (1), p.297-332
issn 0961-463X
1461-7463
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2188566851
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Collectivism
Coordination
Cross-cultural psychology
Distinctiveness
Individual differences
Individual psychology
Interdisciplinary aspects
Social isolation
Social psychology
Time use
Well being
title Time–space distanciation: An empirically supported integrative framework for the cultural psychology of time and space
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A15%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%E2%80%93space%20distanciation:%20An%20empirically%20supported%20integrative%20framework%20for%20the%20cultural%20psychology%20of%20time%20and%20space&rft.jtitle=Time%20&%20society&rft.au=Keefer,%20Lucas%20A&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=297-332&rft.issn=0961-463X&rft.eissn=1461-7463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0961463X17716736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2188566851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4b8b3828edff06eb051c62ca9a494a7e4352b3d661779a1dc9726f167d8c00443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188566851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0961463X17716736&rfr_iscdi=true