Loading…
A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic
Studies examining pretreatment dropout in outpatient substance abuse clinics have consistently demonstrated that fewer days between phone contact and scheduled intake appointment result in higher client show rates. To compare time to intake with two other interventions hypothesized to increase show...
Saved in:
Published in: | Addictive behaviors 1999-07, Vol.24 (4), p.579-582 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 582 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 579 |
container_title | Addictive behaviors |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | STASIEWICZ, P. R STALKER, R |
description | Studies examining pretreatment dropout in outpatient substance abuse clinics have consistently demonstrated that fewer days between phone contact and scheduled intake appointment result in higher client show rates. To compare time to intake with two other interventions hypothesized to increase show rates, individuals (N = 128) seeking treatment were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Individuals in Group 1 were scheduled within 48 hours of the telephone intake. Individuals in Groups 2, 3, and 4 were scheduled 48 hours or more after the telephone intake and received either a reminder call 24 hours prior to their appointment (Group 2), an appointment card and clinic brochure in the mail (Group 3), or no intervention (Group 4). The results show that Group 1 had a higher show rate as compared to the other three groups, and receiving a reminder call or an appointment card did not improve show rates beyond that of the no-contact control group. Implications for intake procedures are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00082-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218995442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>53091074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-43b8dc88125c254b85a4df5ef3d35975da265f8d5249081a7bcf017638c6f5f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0EtLxDAQAOAgiruu_gQliAc9VPNuelwWX7DgQT2XNE0wy7apeQj-eyOuehqY-WaGGQBOMbrGCIubZ0SRqJhA9LKRVwghSSq6B-ZY1rQSlNT7YP5HZuAoxg1CmNScHYIZRkwIydkcuCXUfphUcNGP0FuY3oIx0I3JhA8zJufHCEtlCiYFo9JQcrAPfvI5waCSicVCVVpzmlRy3-WYu5jUqA1UXY4G6q0bnT4GB1ZtoznZxQV4vbt9WT1U66f7x9VyXU1E0FQx2sleS4kJ14SzTnLFesuNpT3lTc17RQS3sueENUhiVXfaIlwLKrWw3CK6AOc_c6fg37OJqd34HMaysiVYNg1njBR0tkO5G0zfTsENKny2v48p4GIHVNRqa0O5x8V_1yBBsaBfW5hz0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218995442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>STASIEWICZ, P. R ; STALKER, R</creator><creatorcontrib>STASIEWICZ, P. R ; STALKER, R</creatorcontrib><description>Studies examining pretreatment dropout in outpatient substance abuse clinics have consistently demonstrated that fewer days between phone contact and scheduled intake appointment result in higher client show rates. To compare time to intake with two other interventions hypothesized to increase show rates, individuals (N = 128) seeking treatment were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Individuals in Group 1 were scheduled within 48 hours of the telephone intake. Individuals in Groups 2, 3, and 4 were scheduled 48 hours or more after the telephone intake and received either a reminder call 24 hours prior to their appointment (Group 2), an appointment card and clinic brochure in the mail (Group 3), or no intervention (Group 4). The results show that Group 1 had a higher show rate as compared to the other three groups, and receiving a reminder call or an appointment card did not improve show rates beyond that of the no-contact control group. Implications for intake procedures are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00082-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10466854</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADBED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alcoholism - psychology ; Alcoholism - therapy ; Ambulatory Care ; Analysis of Variance ; Appointments and Schedules ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinics ; Compliance ; Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Patient Dropouts - statistics & numerical data ; Postal Service ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reminder Systems ; Substance abuse treatment ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Telephone ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Addictive behaviors, 1999-07, Vol.24 (4), p.579-582</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jul/Aug 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1906316$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10466854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STASIEWICZ, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STALKER, R</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic</title><title>Addictive behaviors</title><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><description>Studies examining pretreatment dropout in outpatient substance abuse clinics have consistently demonstrated that fewer days between phone contact and scheduled intake appointment result in higher client show rates. To compare time to intake with two other interventions hypothesized to increase show rates, individuals (N = 128) seeking treatment were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Individuals in Group 1 were scheduled within 48 hours of the telephone intake. Individuals in Groups 2, 3, and 4 were scheduled 48 hours or more after the telephone intake and received either a reminder call 24 hours prior to their appointment (Group 2), an appointment card and clinic brochure in the mail (Group 3), or no intervention (Group 4). The results show that Group 1 had a higher show rate as compared to the other three groups, and receiving a reminder call or an appointment card did not improve show rates beyond that of the no-contact control group. Implications for intake procedures are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcoholism - psychology</subject><subject>Alcoholism - therapy</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Appointments and Schedules</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Dropouts - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reminder Systems</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0306-4603</issn><issn>1873-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0EtLxDAQAOAgiruu_gQliAc9VPNuelwWX7DgQT2XNE0wy7apeQj-eyOuehqY-WaGGQBOMbrGCIubZ0SRqJhA9LKRVwghSSq6B-ZY1rQSlNT7YP5HZuAoxg1CmNScHYIZRkwIydkcuCXUfphUcNGP0FuY3oIx0I3JhA8zJufHCEtlCiYFo9JQcrAPfvI5waCSicVCVVpzmlRy3-WYu5jUqA1UXY4G6q0bnT4GB1ZtoznZxQV4vbt9WT1U66f7x9VyXU1E0FQx2sleS4kJ14SzTnLFesuNpT3lTc17RQS3sueENUhiVXfaIlwLKrWw3CK6AOc_c6fg37OJqd34HMaysiVYNg1njBR0tkO5G0zfTsENKny2v48p4GIHVNRqa0O5x8V_1yBBsaBfW5hz0A</recordid><startdate>19990701</startdate><enddate>19990701</enddate><creator>STASIEWICZ, P. R</creator><creator>STALKER, R</creator><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990701</creationdate><title>A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic</title><author>STASIEWICZ, P. R ; STALKER, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-43b8dc88125c254b85a4df5ef3d35975da265f8d5249081a7bcf017638c6f5f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcoholism - psychology</topic><topic>Alcoholism - therapy</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Appointments and Schedules</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Dropouts - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reminder Systems</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STASIEWICZ, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STALKER, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STASIEWICZ, P. R</au><au>STALKER, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic</atitle><jtitle>Addictive behaviors</jtitle><addtitle>Addict Behav</addtitle><date>1999-07-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>579</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>579-582</pages><issn>0306-4603</issn><eissn>1873-6327</eissn><coden>ADBED9</coden><abstract>Studies examining pretreatment dropout in outpatient substance abuse clinics have consistently demonstrated that fewer days between phone contact and scheduled intake appointment result in higher client show rates. To compare time to intake with two other interventions hypothesized to increase show rates, individuals (N = 128) seeking treatment were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Individuals in Group 1 were scheduled within 48 hours of the telephone intake. Individuals in Groups 2, 3, and 4 were scheduled 48 hours or more after the telephone intake and received either a reminder call 24 hours prior to their appointment (Group 2), an appointment card and clinic brochure in the mail (Group 3), or no intervention (Group 4). The results show that Group 1 had a higher show rate as compared to the other three groups, and receiving a reminder call or an appointment card did not improve show rates beyond that of the no-contact control group. Implications for intake procedures are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>10466854</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00082-3</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-4603 |
ispartof | Addictive behaviors, 1999-07, Vol.24 (4), p.579-582 |
issn | 0306-4603 1873-6327 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218995442 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Alcoholism - psychology Alcoholism - therapy Ambulatory Care Analysis of Variance Appointments and Schedules Biological and medical sciences Clinics Compliance Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal Female Humans Male Medical sciences Patient Dropouts - statistics & numerical data Postal Service Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reminder Systems Substance abuse treatment Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - statistics & numerical data Telephone Treatments |
title | A comparison of three interventions on pretreatment dropout rates in an outpatient substance abuse clinic |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A23%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20three%20interventions%20on%20pretreatment%20dropout%20rates%20in%20an%20outpatient%20substance%20abuse%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Addictive%20behaviors&rft.au=STASIEWICZ,%20P.%20R&rft.date=1999-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=579&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=579-582&rft.issn=0306-4603&rft.eissn=1873-6327&rft.coden=ADBED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00082-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E53091074%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-43b8dc88125c254b85a4df5ef3d35975da265f8d5249081a7bcf017638c6f5f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218995442&rft_id=info:pmid/10466854&rfr_iscdi=true |