Reference List Inaccuracies: A Four-Decade Comparison

Errors in the reference lists of journal articles have been reported in studies conducted on journals issued in the 1970s and 1980s. On the average, faults and errors were found to occur in about 40% of the entries. The Personnel and Guidance Journal and a journal related to information science were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of counseling and development 1987-12, Vol.66 (4), p.195-196
Main Author: WHITE, ARDEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Errors in the reference lists of journal articles have been reported in studies conducted on journals issued in the 1970s and 1980s. On the average, faults and errors were found to occur in about 40% of the entries. The Personnel and Guidance Journal and a journal related to information science were the data sources for a four‐decade study. Results indicated that error rates were lower in the mid‐1950s in this sample but were very similar in the last three decades and similar to rates found in other studies. One or more errors occurred in about 40 to 45 of any 100 entries sampled from reference lists. Implications are explored.
ISSN:0748-9633
1556-6676
DOI:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00846.x