Loading…

Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations

The office is a key setting for intervening to reduce sitting, therefore office-specific activity measures are needed to evaluate interventions. We tested whether valid measures of office time and office-specific activities could be obtained using Bluetooth sensing with a variety of sampling interva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour 2019-03, Vol.2 (1), p.36-44
Main Authors: Clark, Bronwyn K., Hadgraft, Nyssa T., Sugiyama, Takemi, Winkler, Elisabeth A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133
container_end_page 44
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour
container_volume 2
creator Clark, Bronwyn K.
Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
Sugiyama, Takemi
Winkler, Elisabeth A.
description The office is a key setting for intervening to reduce sitting, therefore office-specific activity measures are needed to evaluate interventions. We tested whether valid measures of office time and office-specific activities could be obtained using Bluetooth sensing with a variety of sampling intervals, receiver wear positions, and beacon placements. Workers from one building (n = 29, 72% female, age 23–68 years) wore, for one workday, the activPAL3 on the thigh (measured sitting, standing and stepping) and the Bluetooth-enabled ActiGraph Link on the wrist and thigh. Location (office/not) was estimated by Bluetooth signal presence/absence at two beacons in the wearer’s office (desk, wall), with chest-worn video cameras as the criterion. Accuracy in location classification was assessed and compared across 60-s, 30-s, and 10-s sampling intervals. The validity of Bluetooth-derived measures of total time in the office and in office-specific activities was assessed. For both the wrist and thigh-worn Link, with various beacon placements, accurate classification of location (office/not) was obtained, with a significant (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1123/jmpb.2018-0046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2191951182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2191951182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWGqvngOet2aSzX5402JVqPRg601Ckk1synZTk-yh_727VDzNG-bNPOaH0C2QOQBl9_vDUc0pgSojJC8u0ITykmdFAezyXxN-jWYx7gkhFDgQUk7Q17uRsQ-u-8YbdzDYdTjtDF5b67TB2zgOntreJO_TDn-YLvoQH_By2HLKtS6dsOwa_Clb14zNwnfRNSbI5AZ1g66sbKOZ_dUp2i6fN4vXbLV-eVs8rjJN8yplKmdgGFGq1HU-_CBLqRttoKC8KHQJSmpdWZpzmVNT1Lwy1lJV2gpULRkwNkV357vH4H96E5PY-z50Q6SgUEPNASo6uOZnlw4-xmCsOAZ3kOEkgIiRohgpipGiGCmyX5KAZgE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2191951182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations</title><source>Human Kinetics Journals</source><creator>Clark, Bronwyn K. ; Hadgraft, Nyssa T. ; Sugiyama, Takemi ; Winkler, Elisabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bronwyn K. ; Hadgraft, Nyssa T. ; Sugiyama, Takemi ; Winkler, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>The office is a key setting for intervening to reduce sitting, therefore office-specific activity measures are needed to evaluate interventions. We tested whether valid measures of office time and office-specific activities could be obtained using Bluetooth sensing with a variety of sampling intervals, receiver wear positions, and beacon placements. Workers from one building (n = 29, 72% female, age 23–68 years) wore, for one workday, the activPAL3 on the thigh (measured sitting, standing and stepping) and the Bluetooth-enabled ActiGraph Link on the wrist and thigh. Location (office/not) was estimated by Bluetooth signal presence/absence at two beacons in the wearer’s office (desk, wall), with chest-worn video cameras as the criterion. Accuracy in location classification was assessed and compared across 60-s, 30-s, and 10-s sampling intervals. The validity of Bluetooth-derived measures of total time in the office and in office-specific activities was assessed. For both the wrist and thigh-worn Link, with various beacon placements, accurate classification of location (office/not) was obtained, with a significant (p &lt; .05) but trivial difference in accuracy across sampling interval options (F scores all ≈ .98). With the 60-s sampling interval, mean absolute percent error was very small for office time and office sitting time (&lt;5%), but higher for infrequent activities: standing (17%–23%), incidental stepping (30%–49%), and purposeful walking (57%–86%). The ActiGraph Link can be used to validly measure office time and office location of activity with a 60-s Bluetooth setting. Higher resolution improves accuracy but not to a meaningful degree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-6605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2575-6613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2018-0046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champagne: Human Kinetics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Control charts ; Movement ; Offices ; Wearable computers</subject><ispartof>Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2019-03, Vol.2 (1), p.36-44</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bronwyn K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadgraft, Nyssa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Takemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations</title><title>Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour</title><description>The office is a key setting for intervening to reduce sitting, therefore office-specific activity measures are needed to evaluate interventions. We tested whether valid measures of office time and office-specific activities could be obtained using Bluetooth sensing with a variety of sampling intervals, receiver wear positions, and beacon placements. Workers from one building (n = 29, 72% female, age 23–68 years) wore, for one workday, the activPAL3 on the thigh (measured sitting, standing and stepping) and the Bluetooth-enabled ActiGraph Link on the wrist and thigh. Location (office/not) was estimated by Bluetooth signal presence/absence at two beacons in the wearer’s office (desk, wall), with chest-worn video cameras as the criterion. Accuracy in location classification was assessed and compared across 60-s, 30-s, and 10-s sampling intervals. The validity of Bluetooth-derived measures of total time in the office and in office-specific activities was assessed. For both the wrist and thigh-worn Link, with various beacon placements, accurate classification of location (office/not) was obtained, with a significant (p &lt; .05) but trivial difference in accuracy across sampling interval options (F scores all ≈ .98). With the 60-s sampling interval, mean absolute percent error was very small for office time and office sitting time (&lt;5%), but higher for infrequent activities: standing (17%–23%), incidental stepping (30%–49%), and purposeful walking (57%–86%). The ActiGraph Link can be used to validly measure office time and office location of activity with a 60-s Bluetooth setting. Higher resolution improves accuracy but not to a meaningful degree.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Control charts</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Offices</subject><subject>Wearable computers</subject><issn>2575-6605</issn><issn>2575-6613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWGqvngOet2aSzX5402JVqPRg601Ckk1synZTk-yh_727VDzNG-bNPOaH0C2QOQBl9_vDUc0pgSojJC8u0ITykmdFAezyXxN-jWYx7gkhFDgQUk7Q17uRsQ-u-8YbdzDYdTjtDF5b67TB2zgOntreJO_TDn-YLvoQH_By2HLKtS6dsOwa_Clb14zNwnfRNSbI5AZ1g66sbKOZ_dUp2i6fN4vXbLV-eVs8rjJN8yplKmdgGFGq1HU-_CBLqRttoKC8KHQJSmpdWZpzmVNT1Lwy1lJV2gpULRkwNkV357vH4H96E5PY-z50Q6SgUEPNASo6uOZnlw4-xmCsOAZ3kOEkgIiRohgpipGiGCmyX5KAZgE</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Clark, Bronwyn K.</creator><creator>Hadgraft, Nyssa T.</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Takemi</creator><creator>Winkler, Elisabeth A.</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations</title><author>Clark, Bronwyn K. ; Hadgraft, Nyssa T. ; Sugiyama, Takemi ; Winkler, Elisabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Control charts</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Offices</topic><topic>Wearable computers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bronwyn K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadgraft, Nyssa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Takemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Bronwyn K.</au><au>Hadgraft, Nyssa T.</au><au>Sugiyama, Takemi</au><au>Winkler, Elisabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>36-44</pages><issn>2575-6605</issn><eissn>2575-6613</eissn><abstract>The office is a key setting for intervening to reduce sitting, therefore office-specific activity measures are needed to evaluate interventions. We tested whether valid measures of office time and office-specific activities could be obtained using Bluetooth sensing with a variety of sampling intervals, receiver wear positions, and beacon placements. Workers from one building (n = 29, 72% female, age 23–68 years) wore, for one workday, the activPAL3 on the thigh (measured sitting, standing and stepping) and the Bluetooth-enabled ActiGraph Link on the wrist and thigh. Location (office/not) was estimated by Bluetooth signal presence/absence at two beacons in the wearer’s office (desk, wall), with chest-worn video cameras as the criterion. Accuracy in location classification was assessed and compared across 60-s, 30-s, and 10-s sampling intervals. The validity of Bluetooth-derived measures of total time in the office and in office-specific activities was assessed. For both the wrist and thigh-worn Link, with various beacon placements, accurate classification of location (office/not) was obtained, with a significant (p &lt; .05) but trivial difference in accuracy across sampling interval options (F scores all ≈ .98). With the 60-s sampling interval, mean absolute percent error was very small for office time and office sitting time (&lt;5%), but higher for infrequent activities: standing (17%–23%), incidental stepping (30%–49%), and purposeful walking (57%–86%). The ActiGraph Link can be used to validly measure office time and office location of activity with a 60-s Bluetooth setting. Higher resolution improves accuracy but not to a meaningful degree.</abstract><cop>Champagne</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><doi>10.1123/jmpb.2018-0046</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2575-6605
ispartof Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour, 2019-03, Vol.2 (1), p.36-44
issn 2575-6605
2575-6613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2191951182
source Human Kinetics Journals
subjects Accuracy
Control charts
Movement
Offices
Wearable computers
title Measuring Time in the Office Using Bluetooth Sensors: Feasibility and Validity Considerations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A12%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Time%20in%20the%20Office%20Using%20Bluetooth%20Sensors:%20Feasibility%20and%20Validity%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20physical%20behaviour&rft.au=Clark,%20Bronwyn%20K.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=36-44&rft.issn=2575-6605&rft.eissn=2575-6613&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/jmpb.2018-0046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2191951182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-b431e30bb7c94018a7acdce162566c71bacc8f245a42e6958eff2b7f81b9a3133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2191951182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true