Loading…
International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?
Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 102 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Fukunaga, Yuka |
description | Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/amp.2019.61 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195187847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_amp_2019_61</cupid><jstor_id>26628107</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26628107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LwzAUgIMoOKcnz0LAo3bmpW3SeJFR_DEZeJiew2uT1o4tnUl28L-3c6IXT48HH997fIScA5sAA3mD682EM1ATAQdkxEGoBACKQzJiXPIkZ6k8JichLBkbqIKNSDlz0XqHsesdrujUV1303xtFZ-gzbtDd0kXE1qGL17TaRrroWhdo39DyHV1r707JUYOrYM9-5pi8Pdy_lk_J_OVxVk7nSQ0CIDFSISvAADeKC7Q5F1mFGaDgTDIrkGeW10phnsmKFY2qTZFJk2JquOKyScfkcu_d-P5ja0PUy347_L4KmoPKoZADP1BXe6r2fQjeNnrjuzX6Tw1M7yrpoZLeVdICBvpiTy9D7P0vyoXgBbCdLfmx4brynWnt39H_fF-tTnDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195187847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Fukunaga, Yuka</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><description>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-5037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-1118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/amp.2019.61</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abe, Shinzo ; Arbitration ; Attorneys ; Court decisions ; INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD ; International disputes ; Investors ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; Modernization ; Partnership agreements</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26628107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2195187847?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,11688,21376,21394,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33611,33769,36060,43733,43814,44363,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><title>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</title><addtitle>Proc. annu. meet</addtitle><description>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</description><subject>Abe, Shinzo</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD</subject><subject>International disputes</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Partnership agreements</subject><issn>0272-5037</issn><issn>2169-1118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9LwzAUgIMoOKcnz0LAo3bmpW3SeJFR_DEZeJiew2uT1o4tnUl28L-3c6IXT48HH997fIScA5sAA3mD682EM1ATAQdkxEGoBACKQzJiXPIkZ6k8JichLBkbqIKNSDlz0XqHsesdrujUV1303xtFZ-gzbtDd0kXE1qGL17TaRrroWhdo39DyHV1r707JUYOrYM9-5pi8Pdy_lk_J_OVxVk7nSQ0CIDFSISvAADeKC7Q5F1mFGaDgTDIrkGeW10phnsmKFY2qTZFJk2JquOKyScfkcu_d-P5ja0PUy347_L4KmoPKoZADP1BXe6r2fQjeNnrjuzX6Tw1M7yrpoZLeVdICBvpiTy9D7P0vyoXgBbCdLfmx4brynWnt39H_fF-tTnDQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Fukunaga, Yuka</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><author>Fukunaga, Yuka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abe, Shinzo</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD</topic><topic>International disputes</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Partnership agreements</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukunaga, Yuka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. annu. meet</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>100-102</pages><issn>0272-5037</issn><eissn>2169-1118</eissn><abstract>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/amp.2019.61</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-5037 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102 |
issn | 0272-5037 2169-1118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2195187847 |
source | Criminology Collection; Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Abe, Shinzo Arbitration Attorneys Court decisions INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD International disputes Investors Jurisdiction Litigation Modernization Partnership agreements |
title | International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T23%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Arbitration%20and%20Japan:%20Stagnant,%20but%20Signs%20of%20Change?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20ASIL%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Fukunaga,%20Yuka&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=100-102&rft.issn=0272-5037&rft.eissn=2169-1118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/amp.2019.61&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26628107%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195187847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_amp_2019_61&rft_jstor_id=26628107&rfr_iscdi=true |