Loading…

International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?

Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102
Main Author: Fukunaga, Yuka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 102
container_issue
container_start_page 100
container_title Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting
container_volume 112
creator Fukunaga, Yuka
description Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/amp.2019.61
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195187847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_amp_2019_61</cupid><jstor_id>26628107</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26628107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9LwzAUgIMoOKcnz0LAo3bmpW3SeJFR_DEZeJiew2uT1o4tnUl28L-3c6IXT48HH997fIScA5sAA3mD682EM1ATAQdkxEGoBACKQzJiXPIkZ6k8JichLBkbqIKNSDlz0XqHsesdrujUV1303xtFZ-gzbtDd0kXE1qGL17TaRrroWhdo39DyHV1r707JUYOrYM9-5pi8Pdy_lk_J_OVxVk7nSQ0CIDFSISvAADeKC7Q5F1mFGaDgTDIrkGeW10phnsmKFY2qTZFJk2JquOKyScfkcu_d-P5ja0PUy347_L4KmoPKoZADP1BXe6r2fQjeNnrjuzX6Tw1M7yrpoZLeVdICBvpiTy9D7P0vyoXgBbCdLfmx4brynWnt39H_fF-tTnDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195187847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Fukunaga, Yuka</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><description>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-5037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-1118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/amp.2019.61</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abe, Shinzo ; Arbitration ; Attorneys ; Court decisions ; INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD ; International disputes ; Investors ; Jurisdiction ; Litigation ; Modernization ; Partnership agreements</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26628107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2195187847?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,11688,21376,21394,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33611,33769,36060,43733,43814,44363,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><title>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</title><addtitle>Proc. annu. meet</addtitle><description>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</description><subject>Abe, Shinzo</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD</subject><subject>International disputes</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Partnership agreements</subject><issn>0272-5037</issn><issn>2169-1118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9LwzAUgIMoOKcnz0LAo3bmpW3SeJFR_DEZeJiew2uT1o4tnUl28L-3c6IXT48HH997fIScA5sAA3mD682EM1ATAQdkxEGoBACKQzJiXPIkZ6k8JichLBkbqIKNSDlz0XqHsesdrujUV1303xtFZ-gzbtDd0kXE1qGL17TaRrroWhdo39DyHV1r707JUYOrYM9-5pi8Pdy_lk_J_OVxVk7nSQ0CIDFSISvAADeKC7Q5F1mFGaDgTDIrkGeW10phnsmKFY2qTZFJk2JquOKyScfkcu_d-P5ja0PUy347_L4KmoPKoZADP1BXe6r2fQjeNnrjuzX6Tw1M7yrpoZLeVdICBvpiTy9D7P0vyoXgBbCdLfmx4brynWnt39H_fF-tTnDQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Fukunaga, Yuka</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</title><author>Fukunaga, Yuka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abe, Shinzo</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD</topic><topic>International disputes</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Partnership agreements</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukunaga, Yuka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukunaga, Yuka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. annu. meet</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>100-102</pages><issn>0272-5037</issn><eissn>2169-1118</eissn><abstract>Japan has been lagging far behind other jurisdictions in Asia such as Hong Kong and Singapore, which have been widely recognized as international arbitration hubs. However, efforts have been made to transform Japanese cities into new arbitration hubs.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/amp.2019.61</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-5037
ispartof Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 2018-01, Vol.112, p.100-102
issn 0272-5037
2169-1118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2195187847
source Criminology Collection; Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Abe, Shinzo
Arbitration
Attorneys
Court decisions
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF A DYNAMIC AND GROWING FIELD
International disputes
Investors
Jurisdiction
Litigation
Modernization
Partnership agreements
title International Arbitration and Japan: Stagnant, but Signs of Change?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T23%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Arbitration%20and%20Japan:%20Stagnant,%20but%20Signs%20of%20Change?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20ASIL%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Fukunaga,%20Yuka&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=100-102&rft.issn=0272-5037&rft.eissn=2169-1118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/amp.2019.61&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26628107%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1611-d79a081d12d926ae5264ba41a62070e6a24e2c99a547b08f9cd847d3a3d2927f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195187847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_amp_2019_61&rft_jstor_id=26628107&rfr_iscdi=true