On theory in operations management

The field of operations management has been criticized for the inadequacy of its theory. We suggest that this criticism may be too harsh, and further, that many building blocks of theory are prevalent in the body of existing research. This paper has two goals. The first is to suggest that careful or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of operations management 1998-12, Vol.17 (1), p.97-113
Main Authors: Schmenner, Roger W, Swink, Morgan L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Management theory
Operations management
Operations research
Operations strategy
Productivity
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The field of operations management has been criticized for the inadequacy of its theory. We suggest that this criticism may be too harsh, and further, that many building blocks of theory are prevalent in the body of existing research. This paper has two goals. The first is to suggest that careful organization of our thinking can lead to useful, productive theories in operations management that demonstrate all the hallmarks of the familiar theories of natural science. We discuss the nature of scientific inquiry in general terms, and examine the implications for what should be expected from theory in operations management. Our second goal is to illustrate through examples how such theories and their related laws might be developed. Two theories are proposed: the Theory of Swift, Even Flow, and the Theory of Performance Frontiers. The Theory of Swift, Even Flow addresses the phenomenon of cross-factory productivity differences. The Theory of Performance Frontiers addresses the multiple dimensions of factory performance and seeks to unify prior statements regarding cumulative capabilities and trade-offs. Implications drawn from the theories are discussed and concluding remarks suggest the advantages of future theory development and test.
ISSN:0272-6963
1873-1317
DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00028-X