Loading…

Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames

[Display omitted] •The ‘Modified Fish-Bone’ model is adapted for RC moment frames.•A ‘Substitute Frame’ model is proposed to represent RC moment frames.•Both models are evaluated through 4 RC building models and 62 earthquake records.•The evaluation results declare the robustness of both simplified...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering structures 2019-04, Vol.185, p.68-89
Main Authors: Soleimani, Reza, Khosravi, Horr, Hamidi, Hamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3
container_end_page 89
container_issue
container_start_page 68
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 185
creator Soleimani, Reza
Khosravi, Horr
Hamidi, Hamed
description [Display omitted] •The ‘Modified Fish-Bone’ model is adapted for RC moment frames.•A ‘Substitute Frame’ model is proposed to represent RC moment frames.•Both models are evaluated through 4 RC building models and 62 earthquake records.•The evaluation results declare the robustness of both simplified models. This paper aims to develop simplified frame models applicable for Reinforced Concrete (RC) moment frames. For this purpose, the existing Modified Fish-Bone (MFB) model, which is usually used for steel moment frames, is adapted for RC moment frames using modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler springs with deteriorating peak-oriented behavior. Pre-analysis demonstrates that the MFB model requires some modifications for RC moment frames to (a) eliminate the imposed redundant compressive forces to the single column which was caused by the unbalanced shear forces between two half-beams at each story, and (b) simulate the migration of contraflexure point in the beams of original RC frames. The challenges stem from (a) the different negative and positive moment capacities in RC beams, and (b) the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of rotational springs representing beam plastic hinges. More detailed investigation indicates that eliminating the redundant compressive force is the most effective modification, but the migration of contraflexure point due to different negative and positive moment capacities and even the single curvature bending condition of original beams is not crucial. The reason is investigated using step-by-step incremental nonlinear analysis and illustrated that the contraflexure point is usually located in the mid-span at each step, except for a transient phase in the reverse loading. This minor effect is fundamentally based upon the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of RC beams. Hence, two simplified models branch from the Modified Fish-Bone model: (i) the Adapted Fish-Bone (Adapted MFB) model in which the first crucial modification is applied, and (ii) the Substitute Frame in which both modifications are reflected and seems to be more compatible for RC moment frames. In the end, the accuracy of the proposed models is evaluated using two sets of far-fault and one set of near-fault ground motions. The comprehensive nonlinear dynamic analysis demonstrates that the two proposed models can estimate engineering demand parameters with high accuracy, while they greatly simplify the modeling process, computational effort and visualization of results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195247945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029618333571</els_id><sourcerecordid>2195247945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9vFDEMxSMEEkvhMxCJ8wx2JjOZ4VZWLFSqhETbc5RNnJLVzh-STKt--2a1FdeeLNm_92w_xj4j1AjYfT3UNN2nHFebawE41IA1CvWGbbBXTaUa0bxlG0CJFYihe88-pHQAANH3sGHLzbpPOeQ1E99FMxI3k-PGmSWT47uQ_lbf54n4ODs6fuO3jzNPYVyOwYcy9ydF4pGWSImmbHJ4ID57_mdbFGPplFkKZcF0_wJ_ZO-8OSb69FIv2N3ux-32V3X9--fV9vK6shKGXGHjwJBoWmpMZweUdq-6llrwuJfKkpMtWYWDc51q_eB7sFJ6gQb6QlrTXLAvZ98lzv9WSlkf5jVOZaUWOLRCqkG2hVJnysY5pUheLzGMJj5pBH2KVx_0_3j1KV4NqEu8RXl5VlJ54iFQ1MkGmsplIVJh3Rxe9XgGWfiKGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195247945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Soleimani, Reza ; Khosravi, Horr ; Hamidi, Hamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Soleimani, Reza ; Khosravi, Horr ; Hamidi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •The ‘Modified Fish-Bone’ model is adapted for RC moment frames.•A ‘Substitute Frame’ model is proposed to represent RC moment frames.•Both models are evaluated through 4 RC building models and 62 earthquake records.•The evaluation results declare the robustness of both simplified models. This paper aims to develop simplified frame models applicable for Reinforced Concrete (RC) moment frames. For this purpose, the existing Modified Fish-Bone (MFB) model, which is usually used for steel moment frames, is adapted for RC moment frames using modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler springs with deteriorating peak-oriented behavior. Pre-analysis demonstrates that the MFB model requires some modifications for RC moment frames to (a) eliminate the imposed redundant compressive forces to the single column which was caused by the unbalanced shear forces between two half-beams at each story, and (b) simulate the migration of contraflexure point in the beams of original RC frames. The challenges stem from (a) the different negative and positive moment capacities in RC beams, and (b) the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of rotational springs representing beam plastic hinges. More detailed investigation indicates that eliminating the redundant compressive force is the most effective modification, but the migration of contraflexure point due to different negative and positive moment capacities and even the single curvature bending condition of original beams is not crucial. The reason is investigated using step-by-step incremental nonlinear analysis and illustrated that the contraflexure point is usually located in the mid-span at each step, except for a transient phase in the reverse loading. This minor effect is fundamentally based upon the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of RC beams. Hence, two simplified models branch from the Modified Fish-Bone model: (i) the Adapted Fish-Bone (Adapted MFB) model in which the first crucial modification is applied, and (ii) the Substitute Frame in which both modifications are reflected and seems to be more compatible for RC moment frames. In the end, the accuracy of the proposed models is evaluated using two sets of far-fault and one set of near-fault ground motions. The comprehensive nonlinear dynamic analysis demonstrates that the two proposed models can estimate engineering demand parameters with high accuracy, while they greatly simplify the modeling process, computational effort and visualization of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beams (structural) ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Curvature ; Deterioration ; Engineering demand parameters ; Equivalent MDOF Models ; Ground motion ; Hysteresis ; Mechanical loading ; Migration ; Model accuracy ; Modified Fish-Bone Model ; Near-fault records ; Nonlinear analysis ; Nonlinear dynamic analysis ; Nonlinear dynamics ; Parameter estimation ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; RC MRF ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Reverse loading ; Rotational behavior ; Shear forces ; Simplified MDOF Models ; Steel frames ; Steel structures ; Substitutes</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2019-04, Vol.185, p.68-89</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 15, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8972-4894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soleimani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosravi, Horr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><title>Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>[Display omitted] •The ‘Modified Fish-Bone’ model is adapted for RC moment frames.•A ‘Substitute Frame’ model is proposed to represent RC moment frames.•Both models are evaluated through 4 RC building models and 62 earthquake records.•The evaluation results declare the robustness of both simplified models. This paper aims to develop simplified frame models applicable for Reinforced Concrete (RC) moment frames. For this purpose, the existing Modified Fish-Bone (MFB) model, which is usually used for steel moment frames, is adapted for RC moment frames using modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler springs with deteriorating peak-oriented behavior. Pre-analysis demonstrates that the MFB model requires some modifications for RC moment frames to (a) eliminate the imposed redundant compressive forces to the single column which was caused by the unbalanced shear forces between two half-beams at each story, and (b) simulate the migration of contraflexure point in the beams of original RC frames. The challenges stem from (a) the different negative and positive moment capacities in RC beams, and (b) the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of rotational springs representing beam plastic hinges. More detailed investigation indicates that eliminating the redundant compressive force is the most effective modification, but the migration of contraflexure point due to different negative and positive moment capacities and even the single curvature bending condition of original beams is not crucial. The reason is investigated using step-by-step incremental nonlinear analysis and illustrated that the contraflexure point is usually located in the mid-span at each step, except for a transient phase in the reverse loading. This minor effect is fundamentally based upon the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of RC beams. Hence, two simplified models branch from the Modified Fish-Bone model: (i) the Adapted Fish-Bone (Adapted MFB) model in which the first crucial modification is applied, and (ii) the Substitute Frame in which both modifications are reflected and seems to be more compatible for RC moment frames. In the end, the accuracy of the proposed models is evaluated using two sets of far-fault and one set of near-fault ground motions. The comprehensive nonlinear dynamic analysis demonstrates that the two proposed models can estimate engineering demand parameters with high accuracy, while they greatly simplify the modeling process, computational effort and visualization of results.</description><subject>Beams (structural)</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>Deterioration</subject><subject>Engineering demand parameters</subject><subject>Equivalent MDOF Models</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hysteresis</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modified Fish-Bone Model</subject><subject>Near-fault records</subject><subject>Nonlinear analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamic analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamics</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>RC MRF</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Reverse loading</subject><subject>Rotational behavior</subject><subject>Shear forces</subject><subject>Simplified MDOF Models</subject><subject>Steel frames</subject><subject>Steel structures</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9vFDEMxSMEEkvhMxCJ8wx2JjOZ4VZWLFSqhETbc5RNnJLVzh-STKt--2a1FdeeLNm_92w_xj4j1AjYfT3UNN2nHFebawE41IA1CvWGbbBXTaUa0bxlG0CJFYihe88-pHQAANH3sGHLzbpPOeQ1E99FMxI3k-PGmSWT47uQ_lbf54n4ODs6fuO3jzNPYVyOwYcy9ydF4pGWSImmbHJ4ID57_mdbFGPplFkKZcF0_wJ_ZO-8OSb69FIv2N3ux-32V3X9--fV9vK6shKGXGHjwJBoWmpMZweUdq-6llrwuJfKkpMtWYWDc51q_eB7sFJ6gQb6QlrTXLAvZ98lzv9WSlkf5jVOZaUWOLRCqkG2hVJnysY5pUheLzGMJj5pBH2KVx_0_3j1KV4NqEu8RXl5VlJ54iFQ1MkGmsplIVJh3Rxe9XgGWfiKGA</recordid><startdate>20190415</startdate><enddate>20190415</enddate><creator>Soleimani, Reza</creator><creator>Khosravi, Horr</creator><creator>Hamidi, Hamed</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-4894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190415</creationdate><title>Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames</title><author>Soleimani, Reza ; Khosravi, Horr ; Hamidi, Hamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Beams (structural)</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>Deterioration</topic><topic>Engineering demand parameters</topic><topic>Equivalent MDOF Models</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hysteresis</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modified Fish-Bone Model</topic><topic>Near-fault records</topic><topic>Nonlinear analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamic analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamics</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>RC MRF</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Reverse loading</topic><topic>Rotational behavior</topic><topic>Shear forces</topic><topic>Simplified MDOF Models</topic><topic>Steel frames</topic><topic>Steel structures</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soleimani, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosravi, Horr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soleimani, Reza</au><au>Khosravi, Horr</au><au>Hamidi, Hamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2019-04-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>185</volume><spage>68</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>68-89</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •The ‘Modified Fish-Bone’ model is adapted for RC moment frames.•A ‘Substitute Frame’ model is proposed to represent RC moment frames.•Both models are evaluated through 4 RC building models and 62 earthquake records.•The evaluation results declare the robustness of both simplified models. This paper aims to develop simplified frame models applicable for Reinforced Concrete (RC) moment frames. For this purpose, the existing Modified Fish-Bone (MFB) model, which is usually used for steel moment frames, is adapted for RC moment frames using modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler springs with deteriorating peak-oriented behavior. Pre-analysis demonstrates that the MFB model requires some modifications for RC moment frames to (a) eliminate the imposed redundant compressive forces to the single column which was caused by the unbalanced shear forces between two half-beams at each story, and (b) simulate the migration of contraflexure point in the beams of original RC frames. The challenges stem from (a) the different negative and positive moment capacities in RC beams, and (b) the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of rotational springs representing beam plastic hinges. More detailed investigation indicates that eliminating the redundant compressive force is the most effective modification, but the migration of contraflexure point due to different negative and positive moment capacities and even the single curvature bending condition of original beams is not crucial. The reason is investigated using step-by-step incremental nonlinear analysis and illustrated that the contraflexure point is usually located in the mid-span at each step, except for a transient phase in the reverse loading. This minor effect is fundamentally based upon the peak-oriented hysteretic behavior of RC beams. Hence, two simplified models branch from the Modified Fish-Bone model: (i) the Adapted Fish-Bone (Adapted MFB) model in which the first crucial modification is applied, and (ii) the Substitute Frame in which both modifications are reflected and seems to be more compatible for RC moment frames. In the end, the accuracy of the proposed models is evaluated using two sets of far-fault and one set of near-fault ground motions. The comprehensive nonlinear dynamic analysis demonstrates that the two proposed models can estimate engineering demand parameters with high accuracy, while they greatly simplify the modeling process, computational effort and visualization of results.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-4894</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2019-04, Vol.185, p.68-89
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2195247945
source Elsevier
subjects Beams (structural)
Computer applications
Computer simulation
Curvature
Deterioration
Engineering demand parameters
Equivalent MDOF Models
Ground motion
Hysteresis
Mechanical loading
Migration
Model accuracy
Modified Fish-Bone Model
Near-fault records
Nonlinear analysis
Nonlinear dynamic analysis
Nonlinear dynamics
Parameter estimation
Plastic properties
Plasticity
RC MRF
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcing steels
Reverse loading
Rotational behavior
Shear forces
Simplified MDOF Models
Steel frames
Steel structures
Substitutes
title Substitute Frame and adapted Fish-Bone model: Two simplified frames representative of RC moment resisting frames
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A31%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substitute%20Frame%20and%20adapted%20Fish-Bone%20model:%20Two%20simplified%20frames%20representative%20of%20RC%20moment%20resisting%20frames&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Soleimani,%20Reza&rft.date=2019-04-15&rft.volume=185&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=68-89&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2195247945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-13d0ae235e3a6c914cb765e50f1b47ced45ec719dd675f9f80c44f21a08cb7ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195247945&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true