Experimental study on macro- and microstress state, microstructural evolution of austenitic and ferritic steel processed by shot peening

• Published in: Surface & coatings technology 2019-02, Vol.359, p.511-519
• Main Authors: Chen, Ming, Jiang, Chuanhai, Xu, Zhou, Zhan, Ke, Ji, Vincent
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Austenite; Austenitic stainless steels; Compressive properties; Deformation mechanisms; Dislocation density; Duplex stainless steel; Duplex stainless steels; Ferritic stainless steels; Gamma phase; Microhardness; Microstrain; Microstress; Microstructural analysis; Microstructure; Plastic deformation; Residual stress; Shot peening; Surface layers; Thermal expansion; Thermal stress; Work hardening; X-ray diffraction
• ISSN: 0257-8972; 1879-3347
• DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.097

In this study, shot peening (SP) treatment was implemented on a duplex (austenite and ferrite) stainless steel. By using X-ray diffraction residual stress determination and line profile analysis, the residual stress (including macro- and microstress) and microstructure evolutions in the surface layer of the shot peened material were discussed. Results pointed out that the initial thermal stress state were compressive (−80 MPa) in α phase and tensile (90 MPa) in γ phase owing to the different thermal expansion coefficients of the two phases. After SP, the nonreversible plastic deformation of the surface layer and the interior of bulk was the main cause of the macrostresses. SP introduced more compressive residual stress into the γ phase, the maximum compressive stress in γ phase was ~1.3 times larger than that in α phase (−912 vs. −717 MPa) and occurred deeper in the sample interior (~75 vs. 10 μm). The inhomogeneous partitioning of the plastic strains, which was ascribed to the difference of the relative strength and deformation mechanism between the phases, was the contributing cause of microstresses. The average microstresses in surface layer of shot peened alloy were tensile in α phase and compressive in γ phase, the magnitude of which changed with depth since the phase-specific plastic deformation was also a function of depth. The quantitatively microstructural analysis indicated that more deformation was stored in the γ phase, the microstrain and dislocation density at the surface in γ phase were about four and 2.6 times larger than that in α phase (7.25 vs. 1.83 × 10−3, 3.9 vs. 1.5 × 1015 m−2), respectively. Microhardness measurements showed that SP-induced work hardening was more evident in austenite, the hardness of austenitic phase was found significantly higher than that of ferritic phase in near surface region. •Macro- and microstresses in austenitic and ferritic steel after shot peening were determined.•Initial thermal stress state were compressive (−80 MPa) in α phase and tensile (90 MPa) in γ phase.•More deformation was stored in the austenitic phase after shot peening.•Shot peening resulted in the formation of nanotwinned austenitic structure.