Revisiting the Rule of Optimism

The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British journal of social work 2017-09, Vol.47 (6), p.1624-1640
Main Authors: Kettle, Martin, Jackson, Sharon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Child welfare
Deployment
Focused attention
Money
Morality
Optimism
Protection
Social workers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3
container_end_page 1640
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1624
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 47
creator Kettle, Martin
Jackson, Sharon
description The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsw/bcx090
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2196662314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26612872</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/bjsw/bcx090</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26612872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLw0AUBeBBFIzVlWsxILiR2HvnlclSii8oFIqCuyGZzmhC24kziY9_b0rErat7Fx_nwCHkFOEaoWDTqomf08p8QQF7JEEuVUYle9knCQAXGUOgh-QoxgYAcgGYkPOl_ahj3dXb17R7s-myX9vUu3TRdvWmjptjcuDKdbQnv3dCnu9un2YP2Xxx_zi7mWeGIe8yx5BZDoXhTKnhYeCssKIUlBqBypTMSpevnCvBWqmcWCF3BliRo-KGVmxCLsbcNvj33sZON74P26FSUyyklHToGdTVqEzwMQbrdBvqTRm-NYLeLaB3C-hxgUFfjtr37T_wbIRN7Hz4o1RKpCqn7Ae1PmSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2196662314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Rule of Optimism</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kettle, Martin ; Jackson, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kettle, Martin ; Jackson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Child welfare ; Deployment ; Focused attention ; Money ; Morality ; Optimism ; Protection ; Social workers</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2017-09, Vol.47 (6), p.1624-1640</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017</rights><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved. 2017</rights><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26612872$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26612872$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kettle, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Rule of Optimism</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.</description><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Focused attention</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Optimism</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLw0AUBeBBFIzVlWsxILiR2HvnlclSii8oFIqCuyGZzmhC24kziY9_b0rErat7Fx_nwCHkFOEaoWDTqomf08p8QQF7JEEuVUYle9knCQAXGUOgh-QoxgYAcgGYkPOl_ahj3dXb17R7s-myX9vUu3TRdvWmjptjcuDKdbQnv3dCnu9un2YP2Xxx_zi7mWeGIe8yx5BZDoXhTKnhYeCssKIUlBqBypTMSpevnCvBWqmcWCF3BliRo-KGVmxCLsbcNvj33sZON74P26FSUyyklHToGdTVqEzwMQbrdBvqTRm-NYLeLaB3C-hxgUFfjtr37T_wbIRN7Hz4o1RKpCqn7Ae1PmSo</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Kettle, Martin</creator><creator>Jackson, Sharon</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Rule of Optimism</title><author>Kettle, Martin ; Jackson, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Focused attention</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Optimism</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kettle, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kettle, Martin</au><au>Jackson, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Rule of Optimism</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1624</spage><epage>1640</epage><pages>1624-1640</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><abstract>The ‘rule of optimism’ has been a key feature of child protection discourse in the UK since being introduced as a theoretical construct over thirty years ago. It has continuously been drawn upon to explain professional action and has been most notably utilised as a powerful explanatory device within Serious Case Reviews (SCRs). Yet, despite its longevity, the deployment of the construct has been subject to very little critique. This paper seeks to redress that balance and will explore how ‘the rule’ as an explanatory device has become rearticulated and repositioned as an individualising psychological construct which has almost invariably focused attention on the practices of individual social workers at the expense of an analysis of the structural conditions which frame these practices. In doing so, this paper traces the origins of the rule and explores the integrity and thrust of contemporary applications. Evidence from recent SCRs will be drawn upon to suggest that ‘the rule’, albeit in its psychologically distilled form, retains currency. Drawing on the work of Berlant, ‘the rule of optimism’ will be reconsidered alongside an exploration of the ‘role of optimism’.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcx090</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 2017-09, Vol.47 (6), p.1624-1640
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2196662314
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Child welfare
Deployment
Focused attention
Money
Morality
Optimism
Protection
Social workers
title Revisiting the Rule of Optimism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Rule%20of%20Optimism&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Kettle,%20Martin&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1624&rft.epage=1640&rft.pages=1624-1640&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcx090&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26612872%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f313e409c4388e4030fe5e5a522c518ca3e6f7dffa0ee68f5d14fc0397184c2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2196662314&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26612872&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjsw/bcx090&rfr_iscdi=true