Loading…

How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice

Transitional justice is an area of inquiry, a set of practices, a form of politics, a career, and/or a source of hope and disappointment, to name a few of its facets. Centered on the idea that in the aftermath of mass violence or periods of repression, societies need to undergo processes to address...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Berkeley journal of international law 2018-01, Vol.36 (2), p.190
Main Authors: Fletcher, Laurel E, Weinstein, Harvey M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Berkeley journal of international law
container_volume 36
creator Fletcher, Laurel E
Weinstein, Harvey M
description Transitional justice is an area of inquiry, a set of practices, a form of politics, a career, and/or a source of hope and disappointment, to name a few of its facets. Centered on the idea that in the aftermath of mass violence or periods of repression, societies need to undergo processes to address past harm to ensure a peaceful future, transitional justice unabashedly offers itself as a moral project, a ritual cleanse. A community of interested actors advocates, funders, policy makers, practitioners, scholars, and victims is invested in its success. Although how success is defined varies with how the actor interprets the events that trigger a transitional justice response. While stakeholders are essentially in agreement around fundamental questions of goals and tactics, the community is not static. Critiques of transitional justice abound within the community, generally focused on shortcomings in theory and practice. An important part of the critique has been that transitional justice as now conceived is top-down, formulaic, overly focused on international criminal prosecutions, limited to civil and political rights, and, in the worst case, nothing but a shill for global capitalist expansion. In response, there have been calls for a transitional justice that is bottom-up; transformative; economic, social, and cultural rights-focused; and responsive to corporate complicity and to structural inequities. In turn, critics who think transitional justice continues to overpromise and overreach question this expansive agenda. Concerns are raised about a move away from an accountability-focused agenda toward interventions that are development-focused or even nation-building.
doi_str_mv 10.15779/Z38QN5ZB61
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2199228654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2199228654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21992286543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy7sOgjAYQOEOmnidfIE_OKstWCirV3AwGp1YTENqKMEWe4nx7XXwAZzO8h2EJgTPCU2SdFFE7HykxSomHdQnmNEZTQjroYG1NcZ4SSnuozzTLzjplzCweSv-kKWFXN0bL1QpwFUCgqM2rrpo76oA9rwFqeBquLLSSa14AwdvnSzFCHXvvLFi_OsQTXfb6zqbtUY_vbDuVmtvvoO9hSRNw5DFdBn9pz48_D-e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199228654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Fletcher, Laurel E ; Weinstein, Harvey M</creator><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Laurel E ; Weinstein, Harvey M</creatorcontrib><description>Transitional justice is an area of inquiry, a set of practices, a form of politics, a career, and/or a source of hope and disappointment, to name a few of its facets. Centered on the idea that in the aftermath of mass violence or periods of repression, societies need to undergo processes to address past harm to ensure a peaceful future, transitional justice unabashedly offers itself as a moral project, a ritual cleanse. A community of interested actors advocates, funders, policy makers, practitioners, scholars, and victims is invested in its success. Although how success is defined varies with how the actor interprets the events that trigger a transitional justice response. While stakeholders are essentially in agreement around fundamental questions of goals and tactics, the community is not static. Critiques of transitional justice abound within the community, generally focused on shortcomings in theory and practice. An important part of the critique has been that transitional justice as now conceived is top-down, formulaic, overly focused on international criminal prosecutions, limited to civil and political rights, and, in the worst case, nothing but a shill for global capitalist expansion. In response, there have been calls for a transitional justice that is bottom-up; transformative; economic, social, and cultural rights-focused; and responsive to corporate complicity and to structural inequities. In turn, critics who think transitional justice continues to overpromise and overreach question this expansive agenda. Concerns are raised about a move away from an accountability-focused agenda toward interventions that are development-focused or even nation-building.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-5718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15779/Z38QN5ZB61</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: University of California Press Books Division</publisher><subject>Criminal justice ; Environmental justice ; Politics ; Social justice ; Studies ; Transitional justice</subject><ispartof>Berkeley journal of international law, 2018-01, Vol.36 (2), p.190</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of California Press Books Division 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Laurel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Harvey M</creatorcontrib><title>How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice</title><title>Berkeley journal of international law</title><description>Transitional justice is an area of inquiry, a set of practices, a form of politics, a career, and/or a source of hope and disappointment, to name a few of its facets. Centered on the idea that in the aftermath of mass violence or periods of repression, societies need to undergo processes to address past harm to ensure a peaceful future, transitional justice unabashedly offers itself as a moral project, a ritual cleanse. A community of interested actors advocates, funders, policy makers, practitioners, scholars, and victims is invested in its success. Although how success is defined varies with how the actor interprets the events that trigger a transitional justice response. While stakeholders are essentially in agreement around fundamental questions of goals and tactics, the community is not static. Critiques of transitional justice abound within the community, generally focused on shortcomings in theory and practice. An important part of the critique has been that transitional justice as now conceived is top-down, formulaic, overly focused on international criminal prosecutions, limited to civil and political rights, and, in the worst case, nothing but a shill for global capitalist expansion. In response, there have been calls for a transitional justice that is bottom-up; transformative; economic, social, and cultural rights-focused; and responsive to corporate complicity and to structural inequities. In turn, critics who think transitional justice continues to overpromise and overreach question this expansive agenda. Concerns are raised about a move away from an accountability-focused agenda toward interventions that are development-focused or even nation-building.</description><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transitional justice</subject><issn>1085-5718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNy7sOgjAYQOEOmnidfIE_OKstWCirV3AwGp1YTENqKMEWe4nx7XXwAZzO8h2EJgTPCU2SdFFE7HykxSomHdQnmNEZTQjroYG1NcZ4SSnuozzTLzjplzCweSv-kKWFXN0bL1QpwFUCgqM2rrpo76oA9rwFqeBquLLSSa14AwdvnSzFCHXvvLFi_OsQTXfb6zqbtUY_vbDuVmtvvoO9hSRNw5DFdBn9pz48_D-e</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Fletcher, Laurel E</creator><creator>Weinstein, Harvey M</creator><general>University of California Press Books Division</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice</title><author>Fletcher, Laurel E ; Weinstein, Harvey M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21992286543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transitional justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Laurel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Harvey M</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Berkeley journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fletcher, Laurel E</au><au>Weinstein, Harvey M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice</atitle><jtitle>Berkeley journal of international law</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><pages>190-</pages><issn>1085-5718</issn><abstract>Transitional justice is an area of inquiry, a set of practices, a form of politics, a career, and/or a source of hope and disappointment, to name a few of its facets. Centered on the idea that in the aftermath of mass violence or periods of repression, societies need to undergo processes to address past harm to ensure a peaceful future, transitional justice unabashedly offers itself as a moral project, a ritual cleanse. A community of interested actors advocates, funders, policy makers, practitioners, scholars, and victims is invested in its success. Although how success is defined varies with how the actor interprets the events that trigger a transitional justice response. While stakeholders are essentially in agreement around fundamental questions of goals and tactics, the community is not static. Critiques of transitional justice abound within the community, generally focused on shortcomings in theory and practice. An important part of the critique has been that transitional justice as now conceived is top-down, formulaic, overly focused on international criminal prosecutions, limited to civil and political rights, and, in the worst case, nothing but a shill for global capitalist expansion. In response, there have been calls for a transitional justice that is bottom-up; transformative; economic, social, and cultural rights-focused; and responsive to corporate complicity and to structural inequities. In turn, critics who think transitional justice continues to overpromise and overreach question this expansive agenda. Concerns are raised about a move away from an accountability-focused agenda toward interventions that are development-focused or even nation-building.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>University of California Press Books Division</pub><doi>10.15779/Z38QN5ZB61</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1085-5718
ispartof Berkeley journal of international law, 2018-01, Vol.36 (2), p.190
issn 1085-5718
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2199228654
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK
subjects Criminal justice
Environmental justice
Politics
Social justice
Studies
Transitional justice
title How Power Dynamics Influence the "NorthSouth" Gap in Transitional Justice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A10%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Power%20Dynamics%20Influence%20the%20%22NorthSouth%22%20Gap%20in%20Transitional%20Justice&rft.jtitle=Berkeley%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Fletcher,%20Laurel%20E&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.pages=190-&rft.issn=1085-5718&rft_id=info:doi/10.15779/Z38QN5ZB61&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2199228654%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21992286543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199228654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true