Loading…

ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ACCURACY OF BIOGRAPHICAL DATA: LONG-TERM RETEST AND OBSERVER RATINGS

Although the predictive validity of biographical information has been extensively documented in a variety of environments, the extent to which responses to a biodata questionnaire are accurate has not been adequately investigated. In particular, the accuracy of unverifi‐able biodata items has not be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personnel psychology 1986-12, Vol.39 (4), p.791-809
Main Authors: SHAFFER, GARNETT STOKES, SAUNDERS, VICKIE, OWENS, WILLIAM A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although the predictive validity of biographical information has been extensively documented in a variety of environments, the extent to which responses to a biodata questionnaire are accurate has not been adequately investigated. In particular, the accuracy of unverifi‐able biodata items has not been determined. Evidence of accuracy was obtained in the present study using a test‐retest design and informed external observers for verification. Responses were obtained from 237 study participants and 200 observers. Factor and item re‐test correlations were obtained for subject and observer data, and responses were compared using product‐moment correlations and t tests. Results provide evidence that many responses to a biodata questionnaire are accurate. Sources of inaccuracy were assessed, including the impact of social desirability, and applications of the findings to industrial uses of biodata were noted.
ISSN:0031-5826
1744-6570
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00595.x