Loading…

Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics

The aim of this study was to assay the type of allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics and to assess the usefulness of the composition of allergens included in a standard series for the diagnosis of occupational contact allergy used to date. The frequency of contact allergy to the standard s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medycyna pracy 2006, Vol.57 (3), p.245
Main Authors: Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta, Krecisz, Beata, Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 245
container_title Medycyna pracy
container_volume 57
creator Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta
Krecisz, Beata
Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika
description The aim of this study was to assay the type of allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics and to assess the usefulness of the composition of allergens included in a standard series for the diagnosis of occupational contact allergy used to date. The frequency of contact allergy to the standard series of preservatives (thimerosal, Euxyl K 400, formaldehyde, Kathon CG, Quaternium 15, parabens) was assayed in a group of 1937 subsequent patients referred to the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in L6di and examined in the years 2000-2005. The frequency and type of allergy to preservatives of a cosmetic series in a group of 113 patients with poor tolerance of cosmetics were also investigated. Allergy to thimerosal was found in 11.8% of patients tested with a standard series; to formaldehyde in 4.9%; and to Euxyl K 400 in 3.7%. Quaternium and parabens were less allergenic (0.8 and 0.3%, respectively). In the group of 113 patients subjected to patch test with a cosmetic series, allergy, i.e. at least one positive patch test, was observed in 49 (43.4%) patients. Of the 27 preservatives contained in cosmetics, 16 induced positive reaction to chemical compounds. Euxyl K 400 proved to be the basic allergenic preservative of this series, and induced allergy in 21 (18.6%) patients, whereas 17.7% of patients reacted to thimerosal. Only allergy to thimerosal applied to 8 persons, and 7 of them showed inflammatory lesions only on the face. Less allergic biocides were cocamidopropyl betaine (7.1%), Kathon CG (7.1%), Bronopol (5.3%), Germall II (4.4%), triethanolamine (3.5%), Germall 115 (2.6%), DMDM hydantoin (2.6%), Grotan BK (1.8%), sodium-2-pyridinethiol-1-oxide (1.8%), clioquinol (0.9%), Quaternium 15 (0.9%), and dimethylaminopropylamine (0.9%). The results of our study confirmed observations of other authors that allergy to preservatives present in numerous industrial products, especially Euxyl K 400, is still a growing problem. Like many other researchers, we are of the opinion that this allergen should be included in a standard series for the diagnosis of all patients with suspected allergic dermatitis, including that of occupational origin.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220395029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1200217191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p810-73577059606e382a6eeb2e0fbddd06146c154c9bf72fa85655d3141c92df84243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j1tLxDAUhIMo7rr6F6T4XjjJSdLmUYo3WPBl30uanEqX3kzShf33VlyfZgY-ZpgrthWoMOeI5pptQWqVq9Lght3FeARQgMLcsg0vuFg9bFlRTWOyLmW27yl8nbM0ZXOgSOFkU3eimLlfoBvJZ924hjhQ6ly8Zzet7SM9XHTHDq8vh-o933--fVTP-3wuOeQFqqIAZTRowlJYTdQIgrbx3oPmUjuupDNNW4jWlkor5ZFL7ozwbSmFxB17-qudw_S9UEz1cVrCuC7WQgAaBcKs0OMFWpqBfD2HbrDhXP-_xB-cpk2f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220395029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta ; Krecisz, Beata ; Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</creator><creatorcontrib>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta ; Krecisz, Beata ; Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assay the type of allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics and to assess the usefulness of the composition of allergens included in a standard series for the diagnosis of occupational contact allergy used to date. The frequency of contact allergy to the standard series of preservatives (thimerosal, Euxyl K 400, formaldehyde, Kathon CG, Quaternium 15, parabens) was assayed in a group of 1937 subsequent patients referred to the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in L6di and examined in the years 2000-2005. The frequency and type of allergy to preservatives of a cosmetic series in a group of 113 patients with poor tolerance of cosmetics were also investigated. Allergy to thimerosal was found in 11.8% of patients tested with a standard series; to formaldehyde in 4.9%; and to Euxyl K 400 in 3.7%. Quaternium and parabens were less allergenic (0.8 and 0.3%, respectively). In the group of 113 patients subjected to patch test with a cosmetic series, allergy, i.e. at least one positive patch test, was observed in 49 (43.4%) patients. Of the 27 preservatives contained in cosmetics, 16 induced positive reaction to chemical compounds. Euxyl K 400 proved to be the basic allergenic preservative of this series, and induced allergy in 21 (18.6%) patients, whereas 17.7% of patients reacted to thimerosal. Only allergy to thimerosal applied to 8 persons, and 7 of them showed inflammatory lesions only on the face. Less allergic biocides were cocamidopropyl betaine (7.1%), Kathon CG (7.1%), Bronopol (5.3%), Germall II (4.4%), triethanolamine (3.5%), Germall 115 (2.6%), DMDM hydantoin (2.6%), Grotan BK (1.8%), sodium-2-pyridinethiol-1-oxide (1.8%), clioquinol (0.9%), Quaternium 15 (0.9%), and dimethylaminopropylamine (0.9%). The results of our study confirmed observations of other authors that allergy to preservatives present in numerous industrial products, especially Euxyl K 400, is still a growing problem. Like many other researchers, we are of the opinion that this allergen should be included in a standard series for the diagnosis of all patients with suspected allergic dermatitis, including that of occupational origin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0465-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2353-1339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17125030</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Poland: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergens - analysis ; Cosmetics - analysis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Patch Tests ; Poland - epidemiology ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Medycyna pracy, 2006, Vol.57 (3), p.245</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,36993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17125030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krecisz, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</creatorcontrib><title>Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics</title><title>Medycyna pracy</title><addtitle>Med Pr</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assay the type of allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics and to assess the usefulness of the composition of allergens included in a standard series for the diagnosis of occupational contact allergy used to date. The frequency of contact allergy to the standard series of preservatives (thimerosal, Euxyl K 400, formaldehyde, Kathon CG, Quaternium 15, parabens) was assayed in a group of 1937 subsequent patients referred to the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in L6di and examined in the years 2000-2005. The frequency and type of allergy to preservatives of a cosmetic series in a group of 113 patients with poor tolerance of cosmetics were also investigated. Allergy to thimerosal was found in 11.8% of patients tested with a standard series; to formaldehyde in 4.9%; and to Euxyl K 400 in 3.7%. Quaternium and parabens were less allergenic (0.8 and 0.3%, respectively). In the group of 113 patients subjected to patch test with a cosmetic series, allergy, i.e. at least one positive patch test, was observed in 49 (43.4%) patients. Of the 27 preservatives contained in cosmetics, 16 induced positive reaction to chemical compounds. Euxyl K 400 proved to be the basic allergenic preservative of this series, and induced allergy in 21 (18.6%) patients, whereas 17.7% of patients reacted to thimerosal. Only allergy to thimerosal applied to 8 persons, and 7 of them showed inflammatory lesions only on the face. Less allergic biocides were cocamidopropyl betaine (7.1%), Kathon CG (7.1%), Bronopol (5.3%), Germall II (4.4%), triethanolamine (3.5%), Germall 115 (2.6%), DMDM hydantoin (2.6%), Grotan BK (1.8%), sodium-2-pyridinethiol-1-oxide (1.8%), clioquinol (0.9%), Quaternium 15 (0.9%), and dimethylaminopropylamine (0.9%). The results of our study confirmed observations of other authors that allergy to preservatives present in numerous industrial products, especially Euxyl K 400, is still a growing problem. Like many other researchers, we are of the opinion that this allergen should be included in a standard series for the diagnosis of all patients with suspected allergic dermatitis, including that of occupational origin.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergens - analysis</subject><subject>Cosmetics - analysis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Patch Tests</subject><subject>Poland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - toxicity</subject><issn>0465-5893</issn><issn>2353-1339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j1tLxDAUhIMo7rr6F6T4XjjJSdLmUYo3WPBl30uanEqX3kzShf33VlyfZgY-ZpgrthWoMOeI5pptQWqVq9Lght3FeARQgMLcsg0vuFg9bFlRTWOyLmW27yl8nbM0ZXOgSOFkU3eimLlfoBvJZ924hjhQ6ly8Zzet7SM9XHTHDq8vh-o933--fVTP-3wuOeQFqqIAZTRowlJYTdQIgrbx3oPmUjuupDNNW4jWlkor5ZFL7ozwbSmFxB17-qudw_S9UEz1cVrCuC7WQgAaBcKs0OMFWpqBfD2HbrDhXP-_xB-cpk2f</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta</creator><creator>Krecisz, Beata</creator><creator>Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</creator><general>Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics</title><author>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta ; Krecisz, Beata ; Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p810-73577059606e382a6eeb2e0fbddd06146c154c9bf72fa85655d3141c92df84243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergens - analysis</topic><topic>Cosmetics - analysis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Patch Tests</topic><topic>Poland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krecisz, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Medycyna pracy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kieć-Swierczyńska, Marta</au><au>Krecisz, Beata</au><au>Swierczyńska-Machura, Dominika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics</atitle><jtitle>Medycyna pracy</jtitle><addtitle>Med Pr</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><pages>245-</pages><issn>0465-5893</issn><eissn>2353-1339</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assay the type of allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics and to assess the usefulness of the composition of allergens included in a standard series for the diagnosis of occupational contact allergy used to date. The frequency of contact allergy to the standard series of preservatives (thimerosal, Euxyl K 400, formaldehyde, Kathon CG, Quaternium 15, parabens) was assayed in a group of 1937 subsequent patients referred to the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in L6di and examined in the years 2000-2005. The frequency and type of allergy to preservatives of a cosmetic series in a group of 113 patients with poor tolerance of cosmetics were also investigated. Allergy to thimerosal was found in 11.8% of patients tested with a standard series; to formaldehyde in 4.9%; and to Euxyl K 400 in 3.7%. Quaternium and parabens were less allergenic (0.8 and 0.3%, respectively). In the group of 113 patients subjected to patch test with a cosmetic series, allergy, i.e. at least one positive patch test, was observed in 49 (43.4%) patients. Of the 27 preservatives contained in cosmetics, 16 induced positive reaction to chemical compounds. Euxyl K 400 proved to be the basic allergenic preservative of this series, and induced allergy in 21 (18.6%) patients, whereas 17.7% of patients reacted to thimerosal. Only allergy to thimerosal applied to 8 persons, and 7 of them showed inflammatory lesions only on the face. Less allergic biocides were cocamidopropyl betaine (7.1%), Kathon CG (7.1%), Bronopol (5.3%), Germall II (4.4%), triethanolamine (3.5%), Germall 115 (2.6%), DMDM hydantoin (2.6%), Grotan BK (1.8%), sodium-2-pyridinethiol-1-oxide (1.8%), clioquinol (0.9%), Quaternium 15 (0.9%), and dimethylaminopropylamine (0.9%). The results of our study confirmed observations of other authors that allergy to preservatives present in numerous industrial products, especially Euxyl K 400, is still a growing problem. Like many other researchers, we are of the opinion that this allergen should be included in a standard series for the diagnosis of all patients with suspected allergic dermatitis, including that of occupational origin.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine</pub><pmid>17125030</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0465-5893
ispartof Medycyna pracy, 2006, Vol.57 (3), p.245
issn 0465-5893
2353-1339
language pol
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220395029
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Adult
Allergens - analysis
Cosmetics - analysis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology
Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis
Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology
Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Exposure - analysis
Patch Tests
Poland - epidemiology
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - toxicity
title Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contact%20allergy%20to%20preservatives%20contained%20in%20cosmetics&rft.jtitle=Medycyna%20pracy&rft.au=Kie%C4%87-Swierczy%C5%84ska,%20Marta&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.pages=245-&rft.issn=0465-5893&rft.eissn=2353-1339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1200217191%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p810-73577059606e382a6eeb2e0fbddd06146c154c9bf72fa85655d3141c92df84243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220395029&rft_id=info:pmid/17125030&rfr_iscdi=true