An Improved multivariate generalised likelihood ratio control chart for the monitoring of point clouds from 3D laser scanners

Statistical quality control techniques are crucial for manufacturing companies with tight tolerances but high-volume data generated from laser scanners has pushed the limits of traditional control charts. In a previous work, multivariate generalised likelihood ratio control (MGLR) chart was used to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of production research 2019-04, Vol.57 (8), p.2344-2355
Main Authors: Stankus, Sue E., Castillo-Villar, Krystel K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
3D laser scanners
Control charts
Curvature
Defects
Fourier transforms
Likelihood ratio
Methodology
non-contact metrology systems
Quality control
Scanners
spatiotemporal monitoring
statistical design of experiments
Three dimensional models
Tolerances
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Statistical quality control techniques are crucial for manufacturing companies with tight tolerances but high-volume data generated from laser scanners has pushed the limits of traditional control charts. In a previous work, multivariate generalised likelihood ratio control (MGLR) chart was used to identify process shifts and locate defects on artefacts by converting 3D point cloud data to a 2D image. This paper presents a 3D MGLR control chart that retains the 3D nature of the point cloud data and uses a Fourier transform of the point errors. The average run length (ARL1) of the proposed 3D MGLR was tested using a designed experiment with ten replications and varying the number of past scans and number of Regions of Interest (ROIs). The designed experiment was repeated using three defects: incorrect surface curvature, surface scratch, and surface dent. The proposed methodology identified the dent while the prior methodology never identified it. In addition, the proposed methodology had a significantly shorter ARL1 than the prior methodology for the scratch and no significant difference in the ARL1 for the incorrect surface curvature. The proposed 3D MGLR control chart enabled the usage of 3D data without needing to convert it to a 2D image.
ISSN:0020-7543
1366-588X
DOI:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518600