Loading…

Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation

At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Canadian journal of human sexuality 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121
Main Author: McKay, Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
container_title The Canadian journal of human sexuality
container_volume 9
creator McKay, Alexander
description At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220823430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A74293322</galeid><sourcerecordid>A74293322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_AiCq6P7xAFwYOFJM226VHEF4gK6rlM02mbJZuseYj46e2yHlZYckiY-TFD_nvZjPOa5RUti_1sxpiUuZiz6jA7CmFBKWWlkLNs8epCXDmr7UACficwRNuIXrnkAxJYuqmRfAuWLJLVzpNRDyMJanTOkBBThzYGkhMgHmznlvoHO6Kcjd4ZMz3xC0yCqJ09yQ56MAFP_-7j7OPu9v3mIX96uX-8uX7KB1Yzmou6nvf9XFSlRNFVVEHFWCuR1r1qayUKIVUvaQnAa16KElrFZYlQ9S2jBVPFcXa-mbvy7jNhiM1i-oydVjacU8kLUdAJXW3QAAYbbXsXPagBLXowzmKvp_J1JXhdFJxP_GwHVyv92WyZfIeZTodLrXbNvPzn16HhdxwghdA8vj3_oxdbdEQwcQzOpHWsYcv9AlTQmmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220823430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>McKay, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1188-4517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2291-7063</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJHSEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Assertiveness ; Contraception ; Control Groups ; Females ; Grade 7 ; Grade 8 ; High School Students ; Influence ; Junior high school students ; Males ; Peer Influence ; Pregnancy ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Self Efficacy ; Sex education ; Sexual abstinence ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual behavior surveys ; Sexuality ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases ; Study and teaching ; Teenagers ; Youth</subject><ispartof>The Canadian journal of human sexuality, 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</rights><rights>Copyright Sex Information and Education Council of Canada Summer 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220823430?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,21395,33611,33877,34530,43733,43880,44115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><title>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</title><description>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assertiveness</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Junior high school students</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Peer Influence</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Sex education</subject><subject>Sexual abstinence</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual behavior surveys</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1188-4517</issn><issn>2291-7063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_AiCq6P7xAFwYOFJM226VHEF4gK6rlM02mbJZuseYj46e2yHlZYckiY-TFD_nvZjPOa5RUti_1sxpiUuZiz6jA7CmFBKWWlkLNs8epCXDmr7UACficwRNuIXrnkAxJYuqmRfAuWLJLVzpNRDyMJanTOkBBThzYGkhMgHmznlvoHO6Kcjd4ZMz3xC0yCqJ09yQ56MAFP_-7j7OPu9v3mIX96uX-8uX7KB1Yzmou6nvf9XFSlRNFVVEHFWCuR1r1qayUKIVUvaQnAa16KElrFZYlQ9S2jBVPFcXa-mbvy7jNhiM1i-oydVjacU8kLUdAJXW3QAAYbbXsXPagBLXowzmKvp_J1JXhdFJxP_GwHVyv92WyZfIeZTodLrXbNvPzn16HhdxwghdA8vj3_oxdbdEQwcQzOpHWsYcv9AlTQmmQ</recordid><startdate>20000622</startdate><enddate>20000622</enddate><creator>McKay, Alexander</creator><general>SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</general><general>Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</general><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000622</creationdate><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><author>McKay, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assertiveness</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Junior high school students</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Peer Influence</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Sex education</topic><topic>Sexual abstinence</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual behavior surveys</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKay, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</jtitle><date>2000-06-22</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><pages>121-</pages><issn>1188-4517</issn><eissn>2291-7063</eissn><coden>CJHSEA</coden><abstract>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</pub><tpages>121</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1188-4517
ispartof The Canadian journal of human sexuality, 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121
issn 1188-4517
2291-7063
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220823430
source Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Education Collection
subjects Analysis
Assertiveness
Contraception
Control Groups
Females
Grade 7
Grade 8
High School Students
Influence
Junior high school students
Males
Peer Influence
Pregnancy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Self Efficacy
Sex education
Sexual abstinence
Sexual behavior
Sexual behavior surveys
Sexuality
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Study and teaching
Teenagers
Youth
title Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postponing%20sexual%20intercourse%20among%20urban%20junior%20high%20school%20students%20-%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Canadian%20journal%20of%20human%20sexuality&rft.au=McKay,%20Alexander&rft.date=2000-06-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.pages=121-&rft.issn=1188-4517&rft.eissn=2291-7063&rft.coden=CJHSEA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA74293322%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220823430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A74293322&rfr_iscdi=true