Loading…
Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation
At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistica...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Canadian journal of human sexuality 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | The Canadian journal of human sexuality |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | McKay, Alexander |
description | At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220823430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A74293322</galeid><sourcerecordid>A74293322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_AiCq6P7xAFwYOFJM226VHEF4gK6rlM02mbJZuseYj46e2yHlZYckiY-TFD_nvZjPOa5RUti_1sxpiUuZiz6jA7CmFBKWWlkLNs8epCXDmr7UACficwRNuIXrnkAxJYuqmRfAuWLJLVzpNRDyMJanTOkBBThzYGkhMgHmznlvoHO6Kcjd4ZMz3xC0yCqJ09yQ56MAFP_-7j7OPu9v3mIX96uX-8uX7KB1Yzmou6nvf9XFSlRNFVVEHFWCuR1r1qayUKIVUvaQnAa16KElrFZYlQ9S2jBVPFcXa-mbvy7jNhiM1i-oydVjacU8kLUdAJXW3QAAYbbXsXPagBLXowzmKvp_J1JXhdFJxP_GwHVyv92WyZfIeZTodLrXbNvPzn16HhdxwghdA8vj3_oxdbdEQwcQzOpHWsYcv9AlTQmmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220823430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>McKay, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1188-4517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2291-7063</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJHSEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Assertiveness ; Contraception ; Control Groups ; Females ; Grade 7 ; Grade 8 ; High School Students ; Influence ; Junior high school students ; Males ; Peer Influence ; Pregnancy ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Self Efficacy ; Sex education ; Sexual abstinence ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual behavior surveys ; Sexuality ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases ; Study and teaching ; Teenagers ; Youth</subject><ispartof>The Canadian journal of human sexuality, 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</rights><rights>Copyright Sex Information and Education Council of Canada Summer 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220823430?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,21395,33611,33877,34530,43733,43880,44115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><title>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</title><description>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assertiveness</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Junior high school students</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Peer Influence</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Sex education</subject><subject>Sexual abstinence</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual behavior surveys</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1188-4517</issn><issn>2291-7063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_AiCq6P7xAFwYOFJM226VHEF4gK6rlM02mbJZuseYj46e2yHlZYckiY-TFD_nvZjPOa5RUti_1sxpiUuZiz6jA7CmFBKWWlkLNs8epCXDmr7UACficwRNuIXrnkAxJYuqmRfAuWLJLVzpNRDyMJanTOkBBThzYGkhMgHmznlvoHO6Kcjd4ZMz3xC0yCqJ09yQ56MAFP_-7j7OPu9v3mIX96uX-8uX7KB1Yzmou6nvf9XFSlRNFVVEHFWCuR1r1qayUKIVUvaQnAa16KElrFZYlQ9S2jBVPFcXa-mbvy7jNhiM1i-oydVjacU8kLUdAJXW3QAAYbbXsXPagBLXowzmKvp_J1JXhdFJxP_GwHVyv92WyZfIeZTodLrXbNvPzn16HhdxwghdA8vj3_oxdbdEQwcQzOpHWsYcv9AlTQmmQ</recordid><startdate>20000622</startdate><enddate>20000622</enddate><creator>McKay, Alexander</creator><general>SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</general><general>Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</general><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000622</creationdate><title>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</title><author>McKay, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assertiveness</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Junior high school students</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Peer Influence</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Sex education</topic><topic>Sexual abstinence</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual behavior surveys</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKay, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKay, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Canadian journal of human sexuality</jtitle><date>2000-06-22</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><pages>121-</pages><issn>1188-4517</issn><eissn>2291-7063</eissn><coden>CJHSEA</coden><abstract>At baseline, most female students (81%) but less than half of male students (44%) reported that they had never had intercourse. At all three follow-ups, girls in the intervention group were less likely to experience first intercourse than girls in the control group and this difference was statistically significant at the first and the final (15 month) follow-ups. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in intercourse experience among males at any of the follow-ups. For sexually active students at all three follow-ups, intervention group females were more likely to use birth control at last intercourse than control group females. However, for sexually active males, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups for use of birth control at last intercourse at the three follow-ups. Although, at all three follow-ups, intervention females were more likely than their control group counterparts to report that they "definitely" would not have sex in the next six months, the difference between the two groups was significant only at the first follow-up. Similarly, intervention females were more likely to report that they could refuse sex with their boyfriend if they did not feel ready but the difference was again only significant at the first follow-up.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>SIECCAN, The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada</pub><tpages>121</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1188-4517 |
ispartof | The Canadian journal of human sexuality, 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.121 |
issn | 1188-4517 2291-7063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220823430 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Analysis Assertiveness Contraception Control Groups Females Grade 7 Grade 8 High School Students Influence Junior high school students Males Peer Influence Pregnancy Randomized Controlled Trials Self Efficacy Sex education Sexual abstinence Sexual behavior Sexual behavior surveys Sexuality Sexually Transmitted Diseases Study and teaching Teenagers Youth |
title | Postponing sexual intercourse among urban junior high school students - a randomized controlled evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postponing%20sexual%20intercourse%20among%20urban%20junior%20high%20school%20students%20-%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Canadian%20journal%20of%20human%20sexuality&rft.au=McKay,%20Alexander&rft.date=2000-06-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.pages=121-&rft.issn=1188-4517&rft.eissn=2291-7063&rft.coden=CJHSEA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA74293322%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1910-4995ff54768e4d70ca711b8e09fcb9c4348cf806aa292646abc286ea7fb1031c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220823430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A74293322&rfr_iscdi=true |