RESPONSE: Re: Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)

McShane et al. appreciate Popat and Houlston's expression of support of the principles underpinning the REMARK guidelines, and they welcome further dialogue on the specific topic of public access to raw time-to-event data. They explain their reasons for not bundling data access issues with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005-12, Vol.97 (24), p.1855-1856
Main Authors: McShane, Lisa M., Altman, Douglas G., Sauerbrei, Willi, Taube, Sheila E., Gion, Massimo, Clark, Gary M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Guidelines
Meta-analysis
Tumors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:McShane et al. appreciate Popat and Houlston's expression of support of the principles underpinning the REMARK guidelines, and they welcome further dialogue on the specific topic of public access to raw time-to-event data. They explain their reasons for not bundling data access issues with the REMARK guidelines.
ISSN:0027-8874
1460-2105
DOI:10.1093/jnci/dji446