Loading…
Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina
In super-intensive hedgerows, vegetative vigor must be controlled to allow access to harvesting machinery, particularly under Argentina conditions in which olive trees display excessive vigor. During shoot growth (spring–early summer), flowering and fruit set also take place and the potential yield...
Saved in:
Published in: | Irrigation science 2019-07, Vol.37 (4), p.533-546 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3 |
container_end_page | 546 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | Irrigation science |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Trentacoste, Eduardo R. Calderón, Facundo J. Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio Galarza, Walter Banco, Adriana P. Puertas, Carlos M. |
description | In super-intensive hedgerows, vegetative vigor must be controlled to allow access to harvesting machinery, particularly under Argentina conditions in which olive trees display excessive vigor. During shoot growth (spring–early summer), flowering and fruit set also take place and the potential yield (bud number) for the following season is defined. The effect of spring–early summer deficit irrigation was studied as a tool to reduce vegetative growth and its influence on inflorescence development, oil yield, and its components. During three seasons in an olive hedgerow (cv. Arbosana), we evaluated a control irrigated at 70% ETc over the season and two regulated deficit treatments irrigated at 50% (RDI-1) and 30% (RDI-2) ETc during the shoot growth period (from August to January) and then 70% ETc until harvest (May). Hedgerows were mechanically topped and pruned annually on alternate sides. We observed that RDI-1 and RDI-2 reduced hedgerow height and width increment after hedging by 15% and 20%, respectively, compared to control. Inflorescence structures were not affected by water deficit, but the control treatment showed on average 5.8 fruits per fruiting inflorescence, significantly higher than 2.4 fruits per fruiting inflorescence observed in RDI-2. After the third season, RDI-1 and RDI-2 were 174% and 146% more productive than control hedgerows, where the pruned sides showed excessive vigor with lower floral bud induction in the following seasons. Fruit size and oil accumulation were also higher in both RDI-1 and RDI-2 than in control, due to greater fruit exposure to irradiance in most deficit treatments. Compared with control, RDI-1 and RDI-2 allowed water savings of 17% and 35%, respectively, but RDI-1 was more productive and had lower alternate bearing than RDI-2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00271-019-00632-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211488602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211488602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRZuQQCZOfiCrgmwScNt69GuWxjgvDFkkWYtqqbpHRpY6knrCfKd_yBqPIbusqijuPVzqVtV7zi44Y_1lYkz0vGZ8WzPWSVEPL6oNb8rCJd--rDZMNqLu-TC8rt6kdMcY77uh2VQPN9NEOkOYINK8OsxkwNBktc1gY7QzZhs8mDVaP0PeEexpplyue4I5hr95BwtFGwwUWdqFkIFc8M8-9OVuHRwsOQM63C_Bk88JrIfgjowdmZkKJ8FHvb-AqziGhB4_wRJXX8Kg9ys6dzji0WWKvmSEZA09QX6ih-8r-vPinAvZenxbvZrQJXr3PM-q359vfl1_rW9_fPl2fXVba9nJXI9TMxjRi6bTEg3r26YzA2OIpm0J2RZ1Ux6Bums7MnI7ctHiKIRopJwE0ijPqg8n7hLDn5VSVndhLfFcUkJw3gxDx0RRiZNKx5BSpEkt0d5jPCjO1LE8dSpPlfLUU3lqKCZ5MqXl-HeK_9D_cT0CQsuiAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211488602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Trentacoste, Eduardo R. ; Calderón, Facundo J. ; Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio ; Galarza, Walter ; Banco, Adriana P. ; Puertas, Carlos M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trentacoste, Eduardo R. ; Calderón, Facundo J. ; Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio ; Galarza, Walter ; Banco, Adriana P. ; Puertas, Carlos M.</creatorcontrib><description>In super-intensive hedgerows, vegetative vigor must be controlled to allow access to harvesting machinery, particularly under Argentina conditions in which olive trees display excessive vigor. During shoot growth (spring–early summer), flowering and fruit set also take place and the potential yield (bud number) for the following season is defined. The effect of spring–early summer deficit irrigation was studied as a tool to reduce vegetative growth and its influence on inflorescence development, oil yield, and its components. During three seasons in an olive hedgerow (cv. Arbosana), we evaluated a control irrigated at 70% ETc over the season and two regulated deficit treatments irrigated at 50% (RDI-1) and 30% (RDI-2) ETc during the shoot growth period (from August to January) and then 70% ETc until harvest (May). Hedgerows were mechanically topped and pruned annually on alternate sides. We observed that RDI-1 and RDI-2 reduced hedgerow height and width increment after hedging by 15% and 20%, respectively, compared to control. Inflorescence structures were not affected by water deficit, but the control treatment showed on average 5.8 fruits per fruiting inflorescence, significantly higher than 2.4 fruits per fruiting inflorescence observed in RDI-2. After the third season, RDI-1 and RDI-2 were 174% and 146% more productive than control hedgerows, where the pruned sides showed excessive vigor with lower floral bud induction in the following seasons. Fruit size and oil accumulation were also higher in both RDI-1 and RDI-2 than in control, due to greater fruit exposure to irradiance in most deficit treatments. Compared with control, RDI-1 and RDI-2 allowed water savings of 17% and 35%, respectively, but RDI-1 was more productive and had lower alternate bearing than RDI-2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00271-019-00632-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Access control ; Agriculture ; Aquatic Pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate Change ; Components ; Control ; Elongation ; Environment ; Flowering ; Fruit set ; Fruit trees ; Fruits ; Growth ; Harvesting ; Hedgerows ; Irradiance ; Irrigation ; Life Sciences ; Maximum sustainable yield ; Oil ; Olive oil ; Original Paper ; Seasons ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Summer ; Sustainable Development ; Vigor ; Waste Water Technology ; Water deficit ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Irrigation science, 2019-07, Vol.37 (4), p.533-546</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Irrigation Science is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trentacoste, Eduardo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderón, Facundo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galarza, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banco, Adriana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puertas, Carlos M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina</title><title>Irrigation science</title><addtitle>Irrig Sci</addtitle><description>In super-intensive hedgerows, vegetative vigor must be controlled to allow access to harvesting machinery, particularly under Argentina conditions in which olive trees display excessive vigor. During shoot growth (spring–early summer), flowering and fruit set also take place and the potential yield (bud number) for the following season is defined. The effect of spring–early summer deficit irrigation was studied as a tool to reduce vegetative growth and its influence on inflorescence development, oil yield, and its components. During three seasons in an olive hedgerow (cv. Arbosana), we evaluated a control irrigated at 70% ETc over the season and two regulated deficit treatments irrigated at 50% (RDI-1) and 30% (RDI-2) ETc during the shoot growth period (from August to January) and then 70% ETc until harvest (May). Hedgerows were mechanically topped and pruned annually on alternate sides. We observed that RDI-1 and RDI-2 reduced hedgerow height and width increment after hedging by 15% and 20%, respectively, compared to control. Inflorescence structures were not affected by water deficit, but the control treatment showed on average 5.8 fruits per fruiting inflorescence, significantly higher than 2.4 fruits per fruiting inflorescence observed in RDI-2. After the third season, RDI-1 and RDI-2 were 174% and 146% more productive than control hedgerows, where the pruned sides showed excessive vigor with lower floral bud induction in the following seasons. Fruit size and oil accumulation were also higher in both RDI-1 and RDI-2 than in control, due to greater fruit exposure to irradiance in most deficit treatments. Compared with control, RDI-1 and RDI-2 allowed water savings of 17% and 35%, respectively, but RDI-1 was more productive and had lower alternate bearing than RDI-2.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Fruit set</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Hedgerows</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Maximum sustainable yield</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Olive oil</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Vigor</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water deficit</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0342-7188</issn><issn>1432-1319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRZuQQCZOfiCrgmwScNt69GuWxjgvDFkkWYtqqbpHRpY6knrCfKd_yBqPIbusqijuPVzqVtV7zi44Y_1lYkz0vGZ8WzPWSVEPL6oNb8rCJd--rDZMNqLu-TC8rt6kdMcY77uh2VQPN9NEOkOYINK8OsxkwNBktc1gY7QzZhs8mDVaP0PeEexpplyue4I5hr95BwtFGwwUWdqFkIFc8M8-9OVuHRwsOQM63C_Bk88JrIfgjowdmZkKJ8FHvb-AqziGhB4_wRJXX8Kg9ys6dzji0WWKvmSEZA09QX6ih-8r-vPinAvZenxbvZrQJXr3PM-q359vfl1_rW9_fPl2fXVba9nJXI9TMxjRi6bTEg3r26YzA2OIpm0J2RZ1Ux6Bums7MnI7ctHiKIRopJwE0ijPqg8n7hLDn5VSVndhLfFcUkJw3gxDx0RRiZNKx5BSpEkt0d5jPCjO1LE8dSpPlfLUU3lqKCZ5MqXl-HeK_9D_cT0CQsuiAw</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Trentacoste, Eduardo R.</creator><creator>Calderón, Facundo J.</creator><creator>Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio</creator><creator>Galarza, Walter</creator><creator>Banco, Adriana P.</creator><creator>Puertas, Carlos M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina</title><author>Trentacoste, Eduardo R. ; Calderón, Facundo J. ; Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio ; Galarza, Walter ; Banco, Adriana P. ; Puertas, Carlos M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Fruit set</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Hedgerows</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Maximum sustainable yield</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Olive oil</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Vigor</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water deficit</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trentacoste, Eduardo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderón, Facundo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galarza, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banco, Adriana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puertas, Carlos M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trentacoste, Eduardo R.</au><au>Calderón, Facundo J.</au><au>Contreras-Zanessi, Octavio</au><au>Galarza, Walter</au><au>Banco, Adriana P.</au><au>Puertas, Carlos M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle><stitle>Irrig Sci</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>533-546</pages><issn>0342-7188</issn><eissn>1432-1319</eissn><abstract>In super-intensive hedgerows, vegetative vigor must be controlled to allow access to harvesting machinery, particularly under Argentina conditions in which olive trees display excessive vigor. During shoot growth (spring–early summer), flowering and fruit set also take place and the potential yield (bud number) for the following season is defined. The effect of spring–early summer deficit irrigation was studied as a tool to reduce vegetative growth and its influence on inflorescence development, oil yield, and its components. During three seasons in an olive hedgerow (cv. Arbosana), we evaluated a control irrigated at 70% ETc over the season and two regulated deficit treatments irrigated at 50% (RDI-1) and 30% (RDI-2) ETc during the shoot growth period (from August to January) and then 70% ETc until harvest (May). Hedgerows were mechanically topped and pruned annually on alternate sides. We observed that RDI-1 and RDI-2 reduced hedgerow height and width increment after hedging by 15% and 20%, respectively, compared to control. Inflorescence structures were not affected by water deficit, but the control treatment showed on average 5.8 fruits per fruiting inflorescence, significantly higher than 2.4 fruits per fruiting inflorescence observed in RDI-2. After the third season, RDI-1 and RDI-2 were 174% and 146% more productive than control hedgerows, where the pruned sides showed excessive vigor with lower floral bud induction in the following seasons. Fruit size and oil accumulation were also higher in both RDI-1 and RDI-2 than in control, due to greater fruit exposure to irradiance in most deficit treatments. Compared with control, RDI-1 and RDI-2 allowed water savings of 17% and 35%, respectively, but RDI-1 was more productive and had lower alternate bearing than RDI-2.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00271-019-00632-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-7188 |
ispartof | Irrigation science, 2019-07, Vol.37 (4), p.533-546 |
issn | 0342-7188 1432-1319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2211488602 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Access control Agriculture Aquatic Pollution Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate Change Components Control Elongation Environment Flowering Fruit set Fruit trees Fruits Growth Harvesting Hedgerows Irradiance Irrigation Life Sciences Maximum sustainable yield Oil Olive oil Original Paper Seasons Spring Spring (season) Summer Sustainable Development Vigor Waste Water Technology Water deficit Water Industry/Water Technologies Water Management Water Pollution Control |
title | Effect of regulated deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth period on shoot elongation and oil yield components in olive hedgerows (cv. Arbosana) pruned annually on alternate sides in San Juan, Argentina |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A52%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20regulated%20deficit%20irrigation%20during%20the%20vegetative%20growth%20period%20on%20shoot%20elongation%20and%20oil%20yield%20components%20in%20olive%20hedgerows%20(cv.%20Arbosana)%20pruned%20annually%20on%20alternate%20sides%20in%20San%20Juan,%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20science&rft.au=Trentacoste,%20Eduardo%20R.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=533-546&rft.issn=0342-7188&rft.eissn=1432-1319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00271-019-00632-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211488602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-bf48d27246c3ad07546d800aad55ea09ac4defac656ed39b125ab222433f2aeb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211488602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |